On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 10:58:58 -0500 Mark Bucciarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
MB> On Monday 16 February 2004 10:44 am, Paul Johnson wrote: MB> > On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 10:34:14AM -0500, Robert Tilley wrote: MB> > > I have to comment on the seemingly logical contradiction of KDE MB> > > 3.2.0 existing in the "stable" distribution while missing from MB> > > the"unstable" or "testing" branches. MB> > MB> > Except it's not. http://packages.debian.org/stable/x11/kde shows MB> > stable has 4:2.2.25. http://packages.debian.org/testing/kde/kde MB> > shows testing has the same version. MB> > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/kde/kde shows sid has 4:3.1.2 MB> > MB> > So where are you getting the idea that stable has 3.2? MB> MB> There are 3.2 packages for stable on the KDE ftp site. Except that half the packages (more or less) are in the incoming directory rather than pool so that apt-get won't work. James -- +------------------------+-------------------------------+---------+ | James Tappin | School of Physics & Astronomy | O__ | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | University of Birmingham | -- \/` | | Ph: 0121-414-6462. Fax: 0121-414-3722 | | +--------------------------------------------------------+---------+
