Can we lose the 'KDE is cool' blurb, please

Hi, I recently wondered what kooka was and entered 'apt-cache show kooka'. It tells me how cool KDE is, but only at the end do I see what kooka is. Same with all (most?) other KDE packages. Can we lose that 'KDE is cool' blurb in every package description, please (except in the kde metapacka

Playing Shoutcast?

Yo! On my system (KDE-wise mostly unstable, but the problem might well be some library mix-up between KDE 3.2 and 3.3), no application is registered as being able to handle audio/x-scpls. Is there really no KDE application? (And - OT - why doesn't xmms register itself?) Worse: when I manual

Re: Debian 3.0r2, KDE (translated)

On Tuesday 09 March 2004 22.34, Frans Pop wrote: > On Tuesday 09 March 2004 22:24, Ben Burton wrote: > > Quite convenient having a Turkish boyfriend. :) > > > > The question seems to be: > > > > "I downloaded 3.0r2 iso files, and wrote it to CDs. KDE doesn't work. > > When I checked MC and /usr/l

Re: I miss "Start new session" entry in KDE Menu

On Monday 08 March 2004 17.40, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > Before running KDE 3.2.1/3.2.0 from Debian unstable/experimental I used > 3.2cvs packages built by Christian Muehlhaeuser. > > In KDE Menu I got position "Start new session" which spawn KDM on next > console so I and my girlgfirend both can

Re: KMail Progress?

On Saturday 21 February 2004 20.04, Robert Tilley wrote: > Versions of KMail prior to version 1.5.4 would display a small progress > indicator in the lower right-hand corner of the main window. This would > indicate the status of the current mail download. > > It is not present in current versions

kmail - IMAP support regression

Howdy! I'm happily using kmail from the newest KDE 3.2 debs, especially with the 'ignore thread' functionality that allows me to again take Debian list reading from the newsreader to the MUA (and, hence, to IMAP). But kmail's IMAP performance is far worse than before - on folders with 1000 and

kwin (?) has trouble knowing the size of the screen...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Yo! apparently, kwin thinks that my screen only starts 32 pixel (or so) from the top of the screen. With magnetic borders, windows moved to the top of the screen don't snap to the edge but to the position 32pixels beneath the top, and when I switch th

Re: Sharing mail in KMail

On Wednesday 10 September 2003 19:00, Peter Clark wrote: > My wife and I have a 'joint' email account and we would like to both be > able to read it from KMail. What's the best way of setting it up? A Set up an IMAP server and read mail over imap. You can use dovecot, uw-imapd, courier-imap

Re: Konsole and Unicode

On Thursday 31 July 2003 17:10, Peter Clark wrote: > I'm trying to enable Unicode on my system, but ran into a little trouble > with konsole. I have a file that is UTF-8 encoded, but when I view it with > 'less' in konsole, I see the two-character representation, rather than a > single glyph,

Re: Konqueror, UTF-8

On Friday 25 July 2003 19:39, Craig Dickson wrote: > http://aletheuo.ath.cx You may want to put a screenshot online somewhere - konqueror 3.1.1-1 with lucida as default font seems to display the greek name just fine. Also, the greek debian.org homepage seems to display fine. Doesn't KDE us

Re: Threading in KMail

On Wednesday 23 July 2003 09:44, Antiphon wrote: > Is it just me or does the message threading in KMail in need of > improvement? It regularly breaks up threads--even ones with the same > subject line. One thing is that kmail does not do threading by Subject (for which I am grateful - half-broken

Re: kde 3.1.2 TODO for sarge

On Tuesday 15 July 2003 10:23, Riku Voipio wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 08:45:06AM +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: > > Is kmail cleared up? There were reports about kmail from kde 3.1.2 having > > problems with IMAP. I didn't test this mys

Re: kde 3.1.2 TODO for sarge

On Tuesday 15 July 2003 00:13, Riku Voipio wrote: > Hi, > > I thought I'd put some energy on collecting all into > one place, that needs to be fixed for kde3.1 to enter testing: Is kmail cleared up? There were reports about kmail from kde 3.1.2 having problems with IMAP. I didn't test this myself

Re: Using mutt + kmail

On Monday 30 June 2003 13:42, Alex wrote: > El Viernes, 27 de Junio de 2003 23:29, Bart Dorsey escribió: > > Also, the CVS version of KDE understand PGP/MIME, in fact, the kgpg > > integration in KDE 3.2 (cvs) rocks. > > > Does this means that works _without_ plugins? > No. > I've been trying t

kmail and threading (mail header fixup filter)

Hi, I notice that kmail has problems with In-Reply-To: headers that contain things like In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Christian Marillat's message of "Mon, 23 Jun 2003 11:20:09 +0200") (instead of rfc2822-compliant msg-id-only in-reply-to headers), and does not thread such messages proper

Re: Clarification on just what the kde metapackages are (was: kdeprint depends on efax)

On Friday 23 May 2003 11:22, David Goodenough wrote: > As an aside it is a shame that Debian does not have the concept of a > removal meta-package. [...] > The alternative would be an option on apt-get remove which said to go down > the tree and remove everything that this depends on that nothing

Re: Aegypten for sid's KMail?

On Thursday 22 May 2003 20:01, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > that starts the right one. But gpg-agent refuses to start! Or better is > acts as if it starts but when looking for it with "ps ax", it's not there > :( ... and gpg --server sh (or similar commands) segfault immediately. I had the same prob

Re: kmail cc and bcc not working

On Tuesday 08 April 2003 19:37, Marc Tinnemeyer wrote: > So my question is, has anybody here every experienced sth. like that, or > is there a way to check what kmail is doing with CC and BCC ? Works fine here. I guess it's probably some bad interaction between kmail and the outgoing mail trans

Re: kmail & cryptplug anyone?

On Tuesday 08 April 2003 10:34, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 10:13:00AM +0200, Mika Fischer wrote: > > On Tuesday 08 April 2003 09:37, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder > > > > wrote: > > > - > > > Message was signed by [E

Re: kmail & cryptplug anyone?

- Message was signed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Key ID: 0x50DF199327BB42F0). Warning: The signature is bad. - kmail on sid with Ralfs cryptplug... woody packages - so it might be a problem from there. Or is it a genuine problem with kmail? Or has the message been modified by my system? Or b

Re: Kmail (review and feature wishes)

On Friday 04 April 2003 19:09, David Bishop wrote: > On Friday 04 April 2003 08:17 am, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: > > Yo! > > > > Posted here since I guess some of the kde upstream folks read this list, > > too. Many of these probably c

Re: Kmail (review and feature wishes)

On Friday 04 April 2003 18:39, Ralf Nolden wrote: > On Friday 04 April 2003 17:17, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: > > Yo! > > > > Posted here since I guess some of the kde upstream folks read this list, > > too. Many of these probably covered somew

Kmail (review and feature wishes)

Yo! Posted here since I guess some of the kde upstream folks read this list, too. Many of these probably covered somewhere else, too, so please forgive me. Several things have made me switch from gnome to KDE, so I've installed various things and am now relatively happy. For one thing, konquero

Re: 178 days and counting

On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 20:01, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > BTW: I don't understand why most unstable packages are not in unstable > anymore. KDE3.x ist left out because of gcc3.2, although it does not make > much sense: if it breaks on transistion to gcc3.2- well, it's unstable. Same > with XFree4.2

Re: 178 days and counting

On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 19:58, scooter wrote: > what happens on a Debian system when you compile from source? I have run in > succession 3.0 alpha, 3.0beta, 3.1 alpha and now 3.1beta (or for you purests > 3.0.7) All built from tarballs on the dread RH. I have never had the > slightest difficulty

Re: ugle background when starting kdm

On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 22:04, Bastiaan Naber wrote: > > The reason it shows the dots for so long is b/c your computer is slow. The > > faster the computer, the less time to see ugliness. If you get a fast > > enough computer, you won't see it anymore. So spring the $300 for a new > > computer. Also,

Re: KDE3.1 beta, kmail: no imap?

On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 12:52, Karolina Lindqvist wrote: > måndagen den 2 september 2002 12.03 skrev Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von > Bidder: > > Yo! > > > > kmail can not start the kioslave? > > > > === > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] avbidder]$

KDE3.1 beta, kmail: no imap?

Yo! kmail can not start the kioslave? === [EMAIL PROTECTED] avbidder]$ kmail kmail: KMKernel::openReader called kio (KSycoca): WARNING: Found version 49, expecting version 59 or higher. kio (KSycoca): WARNING: Outdated database found === this may be related. Dunno. Later: == kmail:

Re: Fonts are a big concern for Debian, IMHO

On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 14:07, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > > Perhaps cyrillic > > and greek could be omitted at first, but it should be a goal. > > Perhaps latin and german could be omitted at first, but it should be a goal. Yo! I would not object if a free font starts out with greek or cyrilli

Re: Fonts are a big concern for Debian, IMHO

On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 10:35, Jarno Elonen wrote: > + has scandinavian and french characters, euro sign, mathematical >characters etc. MES-2 was mentioned. I think this would be a good goal. Perhaps cyrillic and greek could be omitted at first, but it should be a goal. http://www.cl.cam.ac.u

Re: kmail "no valid and trusted" error

On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 16:57, Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper wrote: > I'm using kmail from kde3 and gpg (GnuPG) 1.0.7 and am getting an error > saying "no valid and trusted" openpgp keys found whenever I try to > encrypt to someone who is on my keyring. > > When I try to send the e-mail, what I get is a

Re: KDE3.x and SID

On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 20:48, Wolfgang Ratzka wrote: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-kde/2002/debian-kde-200205/msg00186.html Great - just come on the list and find this... Some dependency still missing? I usually run gnome (no flames, plz), but as I heard kmail is quite good I wanted to g