On Tuesday 08 April 2003 10:34, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 10:13:00AM +0200, Mika Fischer wrote: > > On Tuesday 08 April 2003 09:37, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder > > > > wrote: > > > ----- > > > Message was signed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Key ID: > > > 0x50DF199327BB42F0). Warning: The signature is bad. > > > ----- > > > > Yeah, the second message got messed up by postfix on my side. > > I therefore replaced it with exim4 :) > > > > Postfix messed with the headers of the MIME parts. But only for signed > > messages with signed attachments... > > I've never seen that in 2+ years of using Postfix at home and at work, > and sending virtually every message signed.
dito. If the bozo is identified and it's postfix, I recommend you take it up with either the postfix Debian maintainer (whom I don't know) or the postfix users or developers list (which, in my experience, are a bunch of friendly people). Of course, this could be a FAQ, too, though I never heard of the problem so far. cheers -- vbi -- random link of the day: http://fortytwo.ch/sienapei/zuhiuche
pgp260L3VPcqq.pgp
Description: signature
