Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hello,
I'm hereby orphaning the java-wrappers package. It is technically
maintained by the debian java team, but I am the sole uploader, so I
prefer to mark it as orphaned as of now.
It is widely used, but does not need much maintenance, since it
seems to "ju
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hello,
I'm hereby orphaning the libjfreechart-java package. Although it is
technically team-maintained under the debian java team, no uploader
(including myself) has been active for ages, it is better to mark it
as orphaned.
Kind regards,
Vincent
Hello,
I'll take care of it.
Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.7.dfsg-5
> of my package "mina".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> libmina-java - Java network application framework
> libmina-java-doc - Java network application framework - do
Hello,
Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> Moving example source code to -doc package seems a rational suggest to me.
> I've just uploaded a new version including this change to mentors (same
> debian
> revision).
On its way ;-)
Cheers,
Vincent
--
The moon was high now, in a sky as
Hello,
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Torsten Werner
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:52 AM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> Any advice on how to build this package in pbuilder and/or buildd?
>
> Just add
>
> deb http://people.debian.org/~twerner/ ./
>
> to your sources.list.
Maybe I'm interfering
Hello,
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Torsten Werner
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>> Maybe I'm interfering here, but I'm pretty sure that such a dirty
>> hack is a no-go for the security team.
>
> that hack in not needed i
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> gcc is a nightmare - it is one of the very few things where you
> can't work around the bootstrapping problem.
Just as a side note, gcc does not directly depend on itself. Or,
rather, gcc-4.3 depends on packages which are
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Torsten Werner
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>> You managed to build it at some point. You didn't have it before and
>> you had it after. So you did manage one to work around that. So you
>> should b
erimental... (during the freeze).
Cheers,
Vincent
--
Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer
http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/
If you put a large switch in some cave somewhere, with a sign on it
saying "End-of-the-World switch. PLEASE DO NOT TOUCH", the paint
wouldn't even have
Hello,
[dropping mentors, this is bound to bore them, I guess]
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan
wrote:
> Because, AFAIK, nobody answer to my initial request email (back in September
> 2008) :) But, I'm really happy to be part of pkg-java now and will move this
> package
experimental. I've just done that
in the SVN repository; an upload is on its way. I've also tagged the
upload (using svn-buildpackage --svn-tag-only).
I don't have the courage to look at your other sponsor requests
tonight - sorry. Some time this week-end, hopefully ?
Cheer
?
* I couldn't build it using pbuilder, since it depends on a package in
NEW...
Cheers,
Vincent
--
Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer
http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/
If you put a large switch in some cave somewhere, with a sign on it
saying "End-of-the-World switch. PLEA
Hello,
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Sylvestre Ledru
wrote:
> Le lundi 16 février 2009 à 19:36 +0530, Onkar Shinde a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> Now that Debian Lenny is released, is there any plan to update batik
>> and fop in unstable?
> I was going to send the same email. ;)
>
> Same with xml-co
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> My previous requests regarding this package have not received any
> response. I am not sure what the reason is. Can someone please take a
> look at the packaging and upload it?
> I have updated the packaging for libcommons-jexl-java
ould consider using a higher debhelper compatibility level (I
guess 5 is enough, but honestly, I don't know).
Cheers,
Vincent
--
Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer
http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/
A guess is just a guess until you turn it into a pie chart.
Then it's an anal
Onkar Shinde wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 1:30 AM, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>> Few things:
>>
>> * why don't you put yourself as Uploader ?
>
> I suppose an uploader has to be at least DM. Is my assumption wrong?
Yes ;-)... The name is misleading. Sho
Onkar Shinde wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 2:05 AM, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>> You're welcome. Apart from that, the package is in a good shape, I'll
>> be pleased to upload it from you as soon as these small details are fixed.
>
> I have done all the changes.
Hello,
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Dominik Smatana
wrote:
>>
>> compile:
>> [mkdir] Created dir: /home/mjj29/scm/debian/build/jargs-1.0.0/classes
>> [javac] Compiling 8 source files to
>> /home/mjj29/scm/debian/build/jargs-1.0.0/classes
>> [javac] source level should be comprised
ly make
it work (see the wrapper script).
Cheers,
Vincent
--
Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer
http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/
If there was anything that depressed him more than his own cynicism, it
was that quite often, it still wasn't as cynical as real life.
-- Terry P
Onkar Shinde wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>> I've noticed on an Ubuntu bug report that you have some ideas about
>> how to make squiggle (from batik) work in Debian. Would you mind
>> investigating that in the Debian package --
Hello !
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> So all in all, patching the file to specify correct paths worked. :-)
> The change is uploaded to batik's latest version in Ubuntu's jaunty -
> https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/batik
> In case you are impatient, please fee
Hello Damien !
Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> Concerning my RFS, should we stop uploading new packages revisions until
> some fix java-gcj-compat-dev ?
If it FTBS in a chroot, sure enough: uploaders can't build...
Cheers !
Vincent
--
If there was anything that depressed him more
Hello !
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> Relating to both the Eclipse stuff and the fact that I'd like to try and
> improve the Java packaging policy in Debian and have booked a debconf
> session to discuss it, who is still active here and interested in the
> Java packag
debian.org/svn/pkg-java/trunk/tags/$d
svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-java/tags/$pkg/$d -m "[$pkg] Fixing
misplaced tag"; done
Cheers !
Vincent
PS: I Cced the bug report as I thought this information would be useful
there too. Please think before keeping it in CC ;
Hello,
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 1:52 AM, Ryan Niebur wrote:
> W: tagsUrl not specified anywhere, looking in the local repository...
> Looking in SVN for: svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-java/tags/libgtk-java
> svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-java/trunk/libgtk-java/../tags/
You see above tha
Good point. Done, thanks !
Vincent
--
Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer
http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/
If you put a large switch in some cave somewhere, with a sign on it
saying "End-of-the-World switch. PLEASE DO NOT TOUCH", the paint
wouldn't even have the time to dry.
Hello,
Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.4-2
> of my package "velocity-tools".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> libvelocity-tools-java - collection of useful tools for Velocity template
> engine
> libvelocity-tools-java-doc - collection of use
Hello,
2009/8/4 Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel
:
> Now running lintian...
> W: remotetea: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/jrpcgen
> W: remotetea:
> executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/jrpcgen-1.0.7.jar
>
> The first one needs me to provide a man page
> is there an tools to help creating a man
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Jan-Pascal van
Best wrote:
> I've received a request (see below) to move the packaging of solr to a
> git repository. Solr is currently maintained in the pkg-java subversion
> repository. In my opinion, this is as is should be: pkg-java is a team
> effort
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Jan-Pascal van
Best wrote:
> Now for the next step: should I remove all files from SVN in
> pkg-java/trunk/solr with a commit message that says where the repository
> has been moved?
Absolutely. We don't want two different repositories for one
package. Make sure
Hello,
Luke Cycon wrote:
> I am looking for some experience outside of my own little world of
> keytouch, and seen as I am stronger in Java than I am in even C/C++, I
> figured that I may as well lend a hand to the pkg-java team.
>
> So I am here to (try to) help you guys out, and if you
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>> Le mercredi 23 septembre 2009 à 14:50 +0530, Onkar Shinde a écrit :
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I am looking for sponsorship for my package jakarta-jmeter. I have
>>> ported the package from
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Torsten Werner wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>> lintian package*.changes | lintian-info
>
> RTFM :)
>
> "Note, that the lintian command has a command line option -i to
> automatically pipe its outp
Hello,
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> I am trying to package a software (sweethome3d) which uses some
> classes from javax.jnlp package. When I searched on javacio.us the
> results indicated that the classes I am looking for are part of
> javaws.jar. This file is current
Hello
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>
>> This raises a problem which I've hit quite a few times already: it is
>> a currently pain to find which java package holds which java classes.
>> It would be quite great to ha
Hello !
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> ~ zipinfo /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/rt.jar | grep
>> SingleInstanceListener
>> -rw 1.0 fat 185 b- stor 09-Oct-12 10:59
>> javax/jnlp/SingleInstanceListener.class
>
> What is version of JRE that you are using?
Hello,
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> Sure, but that only works for installed packages, whereas its
>> utility would be much greater if it was based on some index of the
>> jars available in the Debian archive... (for the record, apt-file is a
>> utility that tells you
s far as I'm concerned, are
relatively small.
Cheers,
Vincent
--
Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer
http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/
I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my
telephone; my wish has come true because I can no longer figure out
how to use my telepho
d use it as CDDL. This
person will simply not be able to use either with the other if he
chooses to do so.
So, as a conclusion, no steps to be undertaken.
Of course, usual IANAL and so on disclaimers apply...
Vincent
--
Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer
http://vince-debian.blogsp
Hello,
Gabriele Giacone wrote:
> I'm packaging sweethome3d [1], a java application.
> I have some questions regarding the best Debian way to do it.
> The upstream tarball includes many libraries which are all included
> during the build in the final jar.
> Most of these libraries are also avai
Onkar Shinde wrote:
> The packaging bits are updated in pkg-java svn.
On its way. Many thanks for all your work !
Vincent
--
Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer
http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/
If there was anything that depressed him more than his own cynicism, it
was that qu
Hello,
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> The Java team takes care of a lot of packages (428)[3] and it's hard to
> keep track of all packages. It becomes harder when you also need to
> track the changes in other distros.
>
> A simple thing to do is to look for changes in Ubuntu and try to
> minimize the d
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>> shouldn't somebody (who knows how) build a database where I can search
>>> for a
>>> Java package and get back the name of the Debian package which contains
>>> it?
>>
>> Was it something like this you were looking for?
>>
>> http://fnords.w
Hello,
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:12 PM, David Goodenough
wrote:
> I am trying to debug a problem with an annotation processor, and I need
> to look at the source for javac to debug it. Openjdk-6-source only contains
> the source for the runtime, and there seem to be no other source packages
> r
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:58 PM, David Goodenough
wrote:
>> The orig.tar.gz is probably the only one you need though.
>>
> That does NOT seem to contain the source of the compiler. There should
> be a file called TreeMaker.java, and it is not present (at least find can
> not find it). There is a
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Pablo Duboue wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Matthew Johnson wrote:
>> On Wed Dec 16 03:58, Pablo Duboue wrote:
>>> What about having -dbg versions of the jars that include the source code and
>>> debug information?
>>
>> Java policy says (or will say)
Hello !
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Damien Raude-Morvan
wrote:
>> Please let me know if are interested in developing and maintaining a
>> package of liferay. It will certainly be a lot of work - probably too
>> much for just one maintainer. We would start with packaging it for
>> Debian/co
Hello
(disclaimer: I am not the Jabref Debian maintainer)
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Egon Willighagen
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Marcelo Laia wrote:
>> marc...@laia:~$ sudo aptitude show jabref
>> Pacote: jabref
>> Depends on: openjdk-6-jre, antlr, antlr3, libjgoodies-look
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Heikki Levanto wrote:
>
> The first exception is
> load: class JavaVersionDisplayApplet.class not found.
> java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: JavaVersionDisplayApplet.class
> and looking deeper in the stack, I see
> Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Network i
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Le jeudi 11 février 2010 à 11:37 +0100, Niels Thykier a écrit :
>> It turns out that we have still have jvmvm and cacao in Debian; the
>> question is, do we really want them?
>>
>> For reference; cacao has not been in testing since 2006-12
ed to suggests. What do you
> think?
I think along the same lines as you do. I manually remove most -gcj
packages.
Vincent
--
Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer
http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/
Some pirates achieved immortality by great deeds of cruelty
and derring-do. Some achieved
Gabriele Giacone wrote:
> Torsten Werner wrote:
>> What is the reason for having it in experimental?
> patch 02_fix_segfault_with_anchors? I think Vincent could answer.
Definitely ;-)...
I've looked into the patch again, it really can't hurt to upload to
unstable.
I can't upload it for now
Torsten Werner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Torsten Werner wrote:
>> instead of discussing ant versions I want to draw your attention to
>> #560044, #560056 and similar bug reports.
>
> thanks to the overwhelming response :) I have looked at this issue by
> myself. The fix i
Torsten Werner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 5:48 PM, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
>> We've done the same workaround for zekr package.
>
> specifying -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true will switch off IPv6
> completely. This is not a good idea.
>
> I'll have a look at the freecol packages.
Do
Torsten Werner wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>> freecol fails, because it spawns a server on "localhost", but it
>> connects using 127.0.0.1.
>
> Yes that is the problem. Replacing 127.0.0.1 with localhost should be
> the c
What do you think ?
Cheers,
Vincent
--
Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer
http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/
Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day.
Give him a poisoned fish and you feed him for the rest of his life !
-- Slightly twisted chinese proverb
Vincent, listening to
Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Le lundi 08 mars 2010 à 20:11 +0100, Vincent Fourmond a écrit :
>> I'm wondering really what could be a decent value for -Xmx parameter.
>> I used to think that the lowest parameter that seem to let the program
>> run for every arch is good,
some hardware - never experienced myself).
Isn't there already a way to do that ? (configuration files setting
various parameters for the JVM ?)
Cheers,
Vincent
--
Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer
http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/
Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day.
G
problems (though I'm wondering if this
hasn't been fixed since I wrote this alias, ages ago).
Cheers,
Vincent
--
Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer
http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/
If you put a large switch in some cave somewhere, with a sign on it
saying "End-of-the-W
Hello,
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Damien Raude-Morvan
wrote:
> Programs and libraries &should; enable JUnit tests, if these are present.
> *However, these tests &mustnot; lead to build failures.*
>
> For some library packages (ie. commons-maths), I'm confidence enough to
> enable unit
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Matthew Johnson wrote:
>> I think we are missing the point here; for instance, I've mostly
>> disabled junit tests because they depend on not-yet-packaged or even
>> non-DFSG-free libraries. I think both formulations are too oriented
>> towards: "junit tests sho
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> one more thing: we could actually also get rid of all javaX-runtime where X
> < 6, or is there any package left in Debian that provides only less than
> java6?
Package: gcj-4.4-jre
Provides: java-runtime, java1-runtime, java2-runtime, java5-r
Hello,
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> As some of you know, default-jdk-builddep (usually) pulls in two JDKs
> (openjdk-6 and gcj/gij) to create -gcj packages.
> However, some people are not aware of this and looking at the name of
> the package they assume it is the Ja
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Enrico Zini wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:26:24PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
>> The change was discussed here on the ML. I don't mind about the
>> name, but this should be a distinct package.
>>
>> CC'ing Enrico; please change that in [1] for now.
>> [1]
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> I am looking for sponsorship of jardiff 0.2-3. The packaging bits are
> updated in pkg-java svn.
On its way. I'll be tagging it in a few seconds.
Cheers,
Vincent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
Hello,
I'm maintaining freecol, a java-based game, and several users
reported crashes - plain real JVM segfaults - on two different
versions and with different JVM, namely openjdk and sun6. I'm a bit at
loss here, since to my knowledge, segfaults can only be the result of:
* a native code e
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> Any sponsorer for this?
Yes, me ;-)...
It's on its way, please tag accordingly.
Cheers,
Vincent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@li
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Scott Howard wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> * Removed dependencies on JREs - per the Java Policy this is no
>> longer required.
>
> Do we not need to depend on default-jre-headless for libraries? Or is
> it optional? I don't
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 11:59 AM, wrote:
> I have prepared the debian package for fop 1.0. I would like to upload it
> to experimental so that people can start playing with it. Does this seems
> resonable, or should I just go ahead and upload to unstable ?
I would suggest uploading to experim
Hi Mathieu,
There is a small glitch that I hadn't noticed when you asked for
feedback about the new fop 1.0 release. If I understand right, fop 1.0
isn't out yet, and you've packaged a SVN snapshot ? If that is the
case, the version isn't correct and will lead to problems when the
real 1.0 is
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Torsten Werner wrote:
> Am 19.07.2010 13:15, schrieb Vincent Fourmond:
>> There is a small glitch that I hadn't noticed when you asked for
>> feedback about the new fop 1.0 release. If I understand right, fop 1.0
>> isn't out
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Apologises for forgetting the most important:
>
> Buildfile: /tmp/imagej-1.44c/build.xml
>
> compile:
> [mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/imagej-1.44c/build
> [javac] /tmp/imagej-1.44c/build.xml:9: warning: 'includeantruntime' was
>
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Here are the main objection that have been raised (by some Ubuntu guys)
>> about the way we are making our packages:
>>
>> 1. "It looks like they're bundling their own Tomcat. We haven't allowed
>> this in the past. Ask that they use our
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Stefane Fermigier wrote:
> So I guess in this case the root of all evil (like often in the Java world)
> comes from Maven...
I think the main problem is the "easy" management of versioned
depencencies. Software that allow the easy coexistence of a multitude
of v
Hello,
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Now that Squeeze is out, I was thinking that we could look at some of
> the things that we would like to get done for Wheezy. During Squeeze I
> compiled a short list of things I would have liked to have done for
> Squeeze or things
[CCing you as I don't know if you have subscribed to debian-java]
Hello,
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Julien CARSIQUE wrote:
> About versions and shared resources, sharing libraries is nice but not
> always reliable and, tell me if I'm wrong, I guess a lot of Debian
> applications are bring
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:55 AM, James Page wrote:
> Appreciate that I have been *absolutely* silent on this mailing list
> since I joined but I would like to get more involved in Java packaging
> for Debian and have a few opinions on some of this thread.
>
> On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 17:07 +0100, Tor
Hello,
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Stefane Fermigier wrote:
>> What is not true? The fact that packaging things in Debian is difficult
>> or the fact that it's so because it requires some added value?
>
> No, the fact that it *only* requires "some" added value.
>
> You are requiring *much
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Torsten Werner wrote:
> Am 09.02.2011 15:24, schrieb Vincent Fourmond:
>> The FTPmaster will *never* accept sourceless JARs.
>
> we don't accept them into Debian's main component. However they are
> acceptable for the non-free compon
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Torsten Werner wrote:
> Am 09.02.2011 15:51, schrieb Stefane Fermigier:
>> Can we start this discussion over with this option in mind ?
>
> There is another option that we should discuss:
>
> - distribute all those binary dependencies in a separate package, e.g.
> n
Hello,
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Stefane Fermigier wrote:
> On Feb 10, 2011, at 10:51 AM, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
>> On 09/02/2011 12:25, Stefane Fermigier wrote:
>> [...]
Could we please end this thread here ? I'm glad it turned into a
constructive discussion on a debian maven re
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 6:51 PM, tony mancill wrote:
> Are there established practices (i.e. naming conventions) for branching
> in the SVN repo in order to provide support over the lifetime of stable?
>
> I need to prepare a security update for tomcat6 for squeeze and would
> like to continue to
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I uploaded two source packages to
>
> http://people.debian.org/~tille/packages/figtree-help-wanted/
>
> One is the just ITPed (#613080) and the other one is FigTree which is
> actually my target package. The originial tarball contained a j
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 7:42 PM, tony mancill wrote:
>> On 12/02/2011 19:02, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>>> A question: do you think it is a good idea to update the
>>> debian/control Vcs fields to point to the branch directory ? My
>>> opinion is that it should be
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> when dealing with phylogenie related programs I found several Java based
> programs up for packaging. I've got FigTree close to ready - just one
> JAR (iText PDF library) is up for isolation of binary JAR into separate
> package (will be to
Hello all,
This is an idea that has been there for a long time, but I haven't
had the time yet to implement it, nor even to voice it so far. What
I'm often missing while packaging Java software is a simple too to
find which debian package holds which class. My idea is to provide a
simple aliot
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 19.02.2011, 15:45 +0100 schrieb Vincent Fourmond:
>> This is an idea that has been there for a long time, but I haven't
>> had the time yet to implement it, nor even to voice it so far. What
>&g
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Torsten Werner
wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>> This is an idea that has been there for a long time, but I haven't
>> had the time yet to implement it, nor even to voice it so far.
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Torsten Werner wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>> That still doesn't provide dependency analysis.
>
> Sure, it is just raw data.
>
>> How do you keep it up-to-date ?
>
> It is a daily c
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>> Please test if you can, and please do report any issue you may find.
> Coming back on this subject.
> It is now OK for Jlatexmath with fop 1.0 and xmlgraphics-commons 1.4.
>
> Is there anything blocking fop 1.0 in unstable ?
I don't kn
javadoc is built for a program, then most probably it is used as a
library too).
Cheers,
Vincent
--
Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer
http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/
Some pirates achieved immortality by great deeds of cruelty
and derring-do. Some achieved immortality by amassing
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> On 4/17/11, tony mancill wrote:
>> Hi Onkar,
>>
>> Thank you for packaging JMeter 2.4. I will sponsor the upload - the SVN
>> repo is
>> fine.
>
> I just realized I forgot to remove quilt build-dep and
> patchsys-quilt.mk from rules file. Se
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 7:31 PM, tony mancill wrote:
> Hi Onkar,
>
> I'll sponsor the upload, but 1 small thing with this update.
>
> The new package ships 2 separate JAR files in usr/share/java/ instead of
> the JAR and a symlink:
>
> excalibur-logkit-2.0.jar
> excalibur-logkit.jar
>
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:26 AM, tony mancill wrote:
>> I've noticed that some of the more recent CDBS packages are installing jars
>> under /usr/share/maven-repo/$class-hierarchy/$upstream-version/$library.jar,
>> and
>> then symlinks in /us
#x27;t last too long, hopefully.
Cheers,
Vincent
--
Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer
http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/
This thing was [...] incessantly making that flat honking noise of the
sort duck hunters make just before they are shot by other duck
hunters.
-- Terry Pratchet, Uns
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Mathieu Malaterre
wrote:
> http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/bio-formats/trunk/debian/rules?view=markup
>
> However during compilation it keeps on failing with:
>
> compile:
> [javac] Compiling 44 source files to
> /home/mathieu/debian/d
/groups/pkg-java/htdocs
(seems like we *are* in the chroot ;-)...).
BTW, I think this file should be group-writable, so that we don't
have to bother you next time, shouldn't it ?
Cheers,
Vincent
--
Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer
http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/
Au r
proach should I choose?
Clearly the option 2. Do you need help and/or sponsoring ?
Cheers,
Vincent
Cheers,
Jakub
--
Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer
http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/
Donkey: No one told me I had the right to remain silent !
Shrek: You *have* the right to rema
Hello,
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Thanks for your comments. I commited a fix for libstylebook-java to svn [1]
> and everything now builds
> without problems.
>
> It would be great if you could review the changes and sponsor upload.
It's currently on its way. For the
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Jakub Adam wrote:
>> For the package you're building that depends on it, it is probably not
>> necessary to use versioned (build)? dependencies as there is only one
>> faulty package that should go out of testing as soon as this one
>> transitions there.
>
> I have
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
