On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Enrico Zini <enr...@debian.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:26:24PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
>> The change was discussed here on the ML. I don't mind about the
>> name, but this should be a distinct package.
>>
>> CC'ing Enrico; please change that in [1] for now.
>> [1]
>> http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/nm/trunk/nm-templates/nm_ts1_followup.txt?revision=1136&view=markup
>
> I'm more than happy to change it, but since [1] is my understanding of
> the situation, obviously my understanding is wrong.
>
> I don't quite understand what is wrong with [1], so you'd help me
> considerably by sending me a patch on how you'd like [1] to be changed.
Probably completely dropping this paragraph is the best solution:
"The same technique is for example adopted by the Java maintainers
without using build-essential but by providing a default-jdk-builddep
metapackage that people can build-depend on."
Cheers,
Vincent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/g2k2e474d6f1004120408ka6c81867o533c8b6a9e57d...@mail.gmail.com
