Hi Mathieu,
There is a small glitch that I hadn't noticed when you asked for
feedback about the new fop 1.0 release. If I understand right, fop 1.0
isn't out yet, and you've packaged a SVN snapshot ? If that is the
case, the version isn't correct and will lead to problems when the
real 1.0 is out... It should really be named 1.0~svn-something, which
means we'll have to resolve to an epoch increase to deal with that.
In addition, you really should mention how you got your SVN
snapshot, so that users could come up with the exact same original
tarball. Ideally, that would involve writing a script in debian/ to
get it directly from the SVN; have a look at jsymphonic for
inspiration (excepted that you really should use ~ instead of +, to
avoid version conflicts as stated above).
Finally, where is the packaging ? SVN repository hasn't been used,
which is a pity, since I for now cannot join in to help you deal with
that. Could you commit your changes ? As the previous versions have
been tagged properly, we shouldn't have too much troubles playing
around with updates to unstable and updates to experimental at the
same time, if need arises.
Cheers,
Vincent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikbi8t-wcx_p4mti5vdz6t-bqsymsqglqalz...@mail.gmail.com
