Re: Competing repositories for libjlatexmath-java

-java.git > > the other is in science-team: > > https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/libjlatexmath-java/blob/master/debian/changelog > libjlatexmath-java (1.0.7-1) unstable; urgency=medium > [ Felix Natter ] >* Moved the package to Git > >

Re: jlatexmath

Le 12/09/2017 à 21:16, Felix Natter a écrit : Sylvestre Ledru writes: Hello, hello Sylvestre, Le 12/09/2017 à 20:31, Felix Natter a écrit : hi, I would like to take over and update jlatexmath. I'm pretty sure that Sylvestre is no longer involved in D

Re: jlatexmath

Hello, Le 12/09/2017 à 20:31, Felix Natter a écrit : hi, I would like to take over and update jlatexmath. I'm pretty sure that Sylvestre is no longer involved in Debian. As a first thing I would like to move the packaging to git. Does anybody object to this? I am still involved (a lot on llv

Re: Bye bye Debian Java hello hello

On 07/02/2015 13:38, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 09:15:58AM +0100, Felix Natter wrote: >> Sylvestre Ledru writes: >> >>> Hello guys, >> >> hello Sylvestre, >> >>> Just a quick email to let you know that I am going to quit t

Bye bye Debian Java

Hello guys, Just a quick email to let you know that I am going to quit this team. Indeed, since I started my new job at Mozilla, I am not longer using most of the packages I used to maintain. Therefor, my interest in Java software has decreased. I removed my admin permissions on the team and I wi

Re: RFS: libxmltooling-java

On 30/07/2014 19:04, Stephen Nelson wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On 30/07/2014 18:46, Stephen Nelson wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am looking for a sponsor for the package "libxmltooling-java"

Re: RFS: libxmltooling-java

Hello, On 30/07/2014 18:46, Stephen Nelson wrote: > Hi, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the package "libxmltooling-java" Did you check with Matthew before? > It builds those binary packages: > > - libxmltooling-java - XMLTooling-J I think this description should be improved. XMLTooling-J does

Re: jessie: Problems upgrading openjdk-7-jdk with openjdk-7-source installed

On 28/07/2014 10:41, Matthias Klose wrote: > Am 27.07.2014 21:33, schrieb Felix Natter: >> Sylvestre Ledru writes: >> >>> Hello Felix, >>> >>> On 27/07/2014 19:42, Felix Natter wrote: >>>> hello, >>>> >>>> I ge

Re: jessie: Problems upgrading openjdk-7-jdk with openjdk-7-source installed

Hello Felix, On 27/07/2014 19:42, Felix Natter wrote: > hello, > > I get this: > > Preparing to unpack .../openjdk-7-jdk_7u65-2.5.1-2_amd64.deb ... > Unpacking openjdk-7-jdk:amd64 (7u65-2.5.1-2) over (7u55-2.4.7-2) ... > dpkg: error processing archive > /var/cache/apt/archives/openjdk-7-jdk_7u65-

Re: Java 9 dropping support for source/target level 1.5

On 15/07/2014 23:55, Matthias Klose wrote: > Am 15.07.2014 23:08, schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: >> This was expected but now it's effective, Java 9 no longer supports >> source/target level 1.5: >> >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk9-dev/2014-July/000972.html >> >> So if you update a package a

Re: RFS: openjfx/8u5-b13-1

On 12/07/2014 22:56, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 09:05:51PM -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 05:10:33PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Now that openjdk-8 has entered the NEW queue I'm looking for a sponsor >>> to upload OpenJFX. The pac

Re: Github mirrors

On 25/06/2014 10:42, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Hi all, > > I've set up mirrors of some of our repositories on Github, I hope this > will facilitate external contributions. > > Here are the repositories currently mirrored, let me know if you'd like > to add more: > > https://github.com/Debian/java-p

Openjdk-7-jre: was: Re: openjdk-8 package available for review

On 02/05/2014 20:18, Felix Natter wrote: > > BTW: my package jmapviewer still Depends: on openjdk-7-jre. This should > soon be changed to default-jre, right? (I _think_ David wants to package > 1.03 anyway...). > Right! Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org

Re: RFS: openjdk-8/8u5-b13-1 (NEW)

On 02/05/2014 15:14, Matthias Klose wrote: > Am 02.05.2014 12:40, schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: >> Hi all, >> >> Here we go, I prepared the openjdk-8 package and I'm looking for a >> sponsor to upload it. There are several issues pending but the package >> is already usable to work on the Java 8 transiti

Re: openjdk-8 package available for review

On 02/05/2014 08:40, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 02/05/2014 06:36, tony mancill a écrit : > >> Given that we're 6 months from the freeze, and just 4 months from the >> deadline for any new transitions [1], is it reasonable to target >> uploading a new java-common to experimental that depends on ope

Re: Moving some Java packages from Debian Med to Debian Java

On 18/04/2014 09:05, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > >> 2. How to fix this Class format issue? > You have to export JAVA_HOME in debian/rules, otherwise the build will > use the current Java alternative which may not be default-jdk. > Or make sure that javac gets this argument "-target 1.6" (version 50)

openjdk-8 as a default-jdk,jre in jessie [Was Re: openjdk-8 package available for review]

On 09/04/2014 05:55, tony mancill wrote: > On 04/08/2014 05:40 PM, Miguel Landaeta wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 12:12:57AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >>> OpenJDK 8 in Jessie is a must-have in my opinion, and we are now on >>> track to provide a proper package. >> Agree. >> >>> The question o

Re: join to pkg-java

Hello Adrian, On 08/02/2014 23:28, Adrian Alves wrote: > Hello Guys, My name is Adrian Alves, I want to join into the java team > at debian > I already had one pkg in debian grokmirror and I want to start > contributing into java-team > > Am a friend of miguel landaeta he support me to join into t

Re: For those who care about ElasticSearch: build dependencies, RFH

Hello Congratulations! On 23/01/2014 15:43, Hilko Bengen wrote: > As a first step, I am going to document the various required > dependencies in the form of RFP bugs that are going to be linked to this > bug (#660826: RFP Elasticsearch) and I will try to make my efforts > available through git re

Re: pkg-java membership

On 19/01/2014 15:02, Tristan Seligmann wrote: > On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >> On 19/01/2014 14:49, Tristan Seligmann wrote: >>> My alioth username is "mithrandi", and I have the package prepared in >>> git locally already. >>

Re: pkg-java membership

Hello, On 19/01/2014 14:49, Tristan Seligmann wrote: > I would like to join the pkg-java team, in order to maintain css2xslfo > (see ITP #694591). > > My alioth username is "mithrandi", and I have the package prepared in > git locally already. Please apply on alioth, we will accept you asap. Sylv

Re: RFS: netbeans_7.0.1+dfsg1-7

Le 04/12/2013 00:08, Andrew Ross a écrit : > On 03/12/13 22:17, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >> On 03/12/2013 21:22, Joachim Zobel wrote: >>> Am Montag, den 02.12.2013, 20:19 +0100 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru: >>>> Yeh. I tried to build it with an hardcoded dependenc

Re: RFS: netbeans_7.0.1+dfsg1-7

On 03/12/2013 21:22, Joachim Zobel wrote: > Am Montag, den 02.12.2013, 20:19 +0100 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru: >> Yeh. I tried to build it with an hardcoded dependency on java 6 but it >> failed. >> >> If someone could try to build a netbeans 7.0.1+dfsg1-6 in unstable

Re: RFS: netbeans_7.0.1+dfsg1-6 - This is a little bit important

On 02/12/2013 19:24, Andrew Ross wrote: > On 27/11/13 19:34, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >> On 26/11/2013 13:08, Vedran Miletić wrote: >>> Why is this an issue? This updates is intended for stable only. >> The issue here is that we have to upload it before in unstable (cf the &

Bug#729227: out of date http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ch-browser-java.html

On 25/11/2013 17:54, Tom Jones wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 04:11:34PM +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >> It should be fixed soon: >> in a few hours (four at most), >> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ should also be OK > Thanks for this. > Done! S

Re: RFS: netbeans_7.0.1+dfsg1-6 - This is a little bit important

On 26/11/2013 13:08, Vedran Miletić wrote: > 2013/11/25 Sylvestre Ledru : >> On 25/11/2013 20:21, Joachim Zobel wrote: >>> Am Montag, den 25.11.2013, 11:58 +0100 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru: >>>> With openjdk-7-jdk:amd64 (7u25-2.3.12-4) >>> The netbeans package

Re: RFS: netbeans_7.0.1+dfsg1-6 - This is a little bit important

Le 26/11/2013 13:08, Vedran Miletić a écrit : > 2013/11/25 Sylvestre Ledru : >> On 25/11/2013 20:21, Joachim Zobel wrote: >>> Am Montag, den 25.11.2013, 11:58 +0100 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru: >>>> With openjdk-7-jdk:amd64 (7u25-2.3.12-4) >>> The netbeans packa

Re: RFS: netbeans_7.0.1+dfsg1-6 - This is a little bit important

On 25/11/2013 20:21, Joachim Zobel wrote: > Am Montag, den 25.11.2013, 11:58 +0100 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru: >> With openjdk-7-jdk:amd64 (7u25-2.3.12-4) > The netbeans package does not build with openjdk-7. Since my intention > was to change as little as possible and sinc

Bug#729227: out of date http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ch-browser-java.html

On 10/11/2013 16:11, Niels Thykier wrote: > Package: java-common > Control: submitter -1 tom.jo...@bccx.com > > On 2013-11-10 12:44, Tom Jones wrote: >> Dear Torsten, Niels, and Javier, >> >> Any chance you could update [1] for Debian 7 (wheezy)? Currently it >> only goes up to Debian 6 (squeeze).

Re: RFS: netbeans_7.0.1+dfsg1-6 - This is a little bit important

On 25/11/2013 05:54, Joachim Zobel wrote: > Hi. > > Since no one has uploaded this yet I wanted to advertise this a bit. > Sorry about that. I just tried to build it in a cowbuilder but it fails with: [javac] missing type arguments for generic class Entry [javac] where K,V are type-variables: [j

Re: openjdk-7 for kfreebsd

Hello, On 13/11/2013 20:45, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Sorry to jump in on a thread about mips, but on kfreebsd we are also > looking to switch to openjdk-7 as soon as possible. And we were advised > to send our patches upstream also. I'd appreciate any advice on how to > go about doing that. >

Bug#730133: java-common: policy vs lintian: needless-dependency-on-jre

On 21/11/2013 22:01, Steve Cotton wrote: Source: java-common Version: 0.49 Severity: serious Justification: the java policy diff'd below is a "must", so a serious bug on lintian While looking at #681763, I found a conflict between policy and lintian: java-common 0.35 removed a "must", that lib

Bug#676618: remove /usr/lib/jni from java.library.path ?

Le 06/11/2013 15:23, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit : > severity 676618 important > user 676618 multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org > usertags 676618 multiarch > thanks > > I am wondering if this make sense to remove /usr/lib/jni from openjdk > and al. since we now have /usr/lib/$(DEB_MULTIARCH)/jni

Uploaded [was Re: TestNG and rdeps to unstable]

On 21/10/2013 15:47, Eugene Zhukov wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >> On 21/10/2013 13:34, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >>> Le 21/10/2013 13:24, Eugene Zhukov a écrit : >>> >>>> So, the question remains: could someone please look i

Re: TestNG to unstable

On 21/10/2013 13:34, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 21/10/2013 13:24, Eugene Zhukov a écrit : > >> So, the question remains: could someone please look into uploading >> TestNG into unstable? > ... along with libhibernate-validator-java and sisu-ioc. > > Emmanuel Bourg > > "Just" those three ? Sylvestr

Re: On JOGL in Debian - [RELEASE] JogAmp 2.0.2; JOGL 10y celebration & SIGGRAPH 2013 BOF

Hello, On 22/08/2013 13:32, Xerxes Rånby wrote: > I wish to announce that JogAmp now have a new tagged JogAmp JOGL 2.0.2 final > release. > http://labb.zafena.se/?p=859 - [RELEASE] JogAmp 2.0.2; JOGL 10y celebration & > SIGGRAPH 2013 BOF > http://forum.jogamp.org/Release-2-0-2-td4029632.html - R

Re: Openjdk-6 bug hurts netbeans

On 11/09/2013 22:12, Joachim Zobel wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 11.09.2013, 21:06 +0200 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru: >> However, it does not seem >> maintained anymore: >> http://packages.qa.debian.org/n/netbeans.html > I already had that impression. I reported > htt

Re: Openjdk-6 bug hurts netbeans

On 11/09/2013 20:06, Joachim Zobel wrote: > Hi. > > I did report the following bug > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=720684 > > which makes netbeans half way unusable. > > Should I write a referencing netbeans bug report? > > Could you move netbeans to openjdk-7 as a workaround?

Re: where is eclipse 4.x?

On 06/09/2013 05:48, Bruno Melo wrote: > where is eclipse 4.x in sid? or why is not in sid? Because probably nobody worked on this yet. Don't hesitate to step in to help. Regards, Sylvestre PS: Hello or thanks are not banned words on Debian Mailing lists ;) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-

Re: where is eclipse?

On 06/09/2013 23:24, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > On 06/09/13 21:55, Robert Millan wrote: >> The way I see it, as things stand now it makes a lot more sense to >> bypass default-jdk in order to get things working... > What do you mean by that? To tighten the build-dependencies of eclipse > and othe

Re: jmock2

On 02/09/2013 16:14, Stephen Nelson wrote: > There's a bug in the jmock project [1] that is blocking the packaging > of openjpa. There is also the more severe FTBFS bug [2] which might > require a breaking change to the api according to the author [3]. I > was intending to look into this in more de

Re: jmock2

On 02/09/2013 16:28, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > #721538 is easy to fix, but the API changes implied by #717122 would be > better dealt by upstream. An alternative would be to build jmock > explicitly with openjdk6, but that would prevent its removal from Jessie. Please, don't depend on OpenJDK6. We ar

Java Release goals for Jessie

Hello, During the last Debconf, Damien and I organized a BOF. During this BOF, we exchange on the various objectives for the Java team. We published the result of the discussions on the Debian Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Goals Some tasks don't have a driver, don't hesitate to step in if yo

Re: Release Goal: Switch to OpenJDK7

Le 18/08/2013 21:58, Julien Cristau a écrit : > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 16:05:50 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I would like to propose the following release goal to the release team >> for Jessie: >> https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/Open

Release Goal: Switch to OpenJDK7

Hello, I would like to propose the following release goal to the release team for Jessie: https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/OpenJDK7 While the OpenJDK 7 switch is done in unstable, there are still packages depending on OpenJDK 6. This release goal will also include the removal of OpenJDK 6 fro

Re: default-jdk change on kfreebsd

On 17/08/2013 16:21, Christoph Egger wrote: > Moin! > > Steven Chamberlain writes: >> On 16/08/13 13:15, Christoph Egger wrote: >>> I talked to rene here at DebConf. The problems did show up in the past >>> when running the testsuite (hangs). Rene tried with current OpenJDK on >>> falla -- in curr

Re: openjpa package

On 15/08/2013 13:09, Stephen Nelson wrote: > I notice this package has a couple of outstanding bugs which I should > be able to fix. I just want to ask a couple of questions: > > The popcon value for this package is low and there do not seem to be > any packages depending on openjpa. I'm not asking

Re: [Debconf-discuss] Java Meeting at debconf

On 14/08/2013 07:04, Thomas Koch wrote: > Hi, > > Ioan Eugen Stan scheduled a Java Meeting at debconf,2013-08-15, 17:30 : > https://penta.debconf.org/penta/schedule/dc13/event/985.en.html > > Unfortunately he could not make it to debconf. I think we should still meet > and discuss current state an

Re: On JOGL in Debian - [SECURITY] JogAmp 2.0.2-rc12 JOGL JOAL JOCL & Gluegen Released!

Le 28/06/2013 20:26, Xerxes Rånby a écrit : > 2013-01-30 13:50, Xerxes Rånby skrev: >> 2013-01-30 13:32, Sylvestre Ledru skrev: >>> Le 01/30/13 13:02, Xerxes Rånby a écrit : >>>> 2013-01-30 12:22, Sylvestre Ledru skrev: >>>>> Le 01/30/13 12:16, X

Re: JAVA_HOME in pbuilder

On 30/06/2013 10:25, olivier.sal...@codeless.fr wrote: > Hi, > I have an issue building a package with pbuilder. > > Package builds fine with dpkg-buildpackage, but when ran with pbuilder, > it seems JAVA_HOME is lost. If you run pbuilder with sudo, you might have to add this line with visudo: Def

Re: [pkg-db-devel] Processing of db_5.1.29-5.1_amd64.changes

On 06/06/2013 19:02, Ondřej Surý wrote: > The thing is that I am preparing for db version transition, so I would prefer > to have more time for possible to avoid duplicate work. This is minor patch (basically, just fixing the upload 5.1.29-5). > Do you hurry that much for OpenJDK transition or ca

gerrit was: Building reverse dependencies automatically was: RFS: guava-libraries/14.0.1-1

On 06/06/2013 21:34, Thomas Koch wrote: > On Thursday, June 06, 2013 02:17:25 PM Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >> Btw, it would be nice to be able to upload the packages to a server that >> would check automatically the compatibility with the reverse >> dependencies and send a nice summary report by email.

Re: [pkg-db-devel] Processing of db_5.1.29-5.1_amd64.changes

On 06/06/2013 18:45, Ondřej Surý wrote: > Gosh, how do I hate unannounced NMUs:-( directly to main queue (instead of > DELAYED). It was delayed of five days, don't worry ;) Uploading db using ftp to ftp-master (host: ftp.upload.debian.org; directory: /pub/UploadQueue/DELAYED/5-day) Sylvestre --

Re: RFS: libxmpcore-java/5.1.2-1 (new package)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 31/05/2013 22:19, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Hi all, > > I packaged the XMPCore library from the Adobe XMP Toolkit (ITP > #710488). This is a dependency of Apache Tika and it's required to > update libmetadata-extractor-java to the latest version. >

Re: GSoC project "OpenJDK and Debian" accepted

On 28/05/2013 11:08, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Sylvestre Ledru > wrote: > [...] >> After that, which should not take very long, I have several things in mind: >> * Draft of the packaging of openjdk 8 (of course, this would be done in >

Re: GSoC project "OpenJDK and Debian" accepted

On 28/05/2013 10:45, Matthias Klose wrote: > Am 28.05.2013 06:21, schrieb Andreas Kuckartz: >> The GSoC proposal "OpenJDK and Debian" was accepted: >> https://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/project/google/gsoc2013/shuxiong/29001 >> >> More details: >> http://wiki.debian.org/SummerOfCode2013/StudentApp

Re: "InfoNode Docking Windows" for Debian?

On 20/04/2013 21:40, Felix Natter wrote: > Sylvestre Ledru writes: > >> On 20/04/2013 20:09, Felix Natter wrote: >>> hi, > > hi Sylvestre, > >>> Concerning the "InfoNode Docking Windows" library: >>> http://infonode.net/index.html?

Re: "InfoNode Docking Windows" for Debian?

On 20/04/2013 20:09, Felix Natter wrote: > hi, > > Concerning the "InfoNode Docking Windows" library: > http://infonode.net/index.html?idw > > It is dual-licensed under GPL and the InfoNode Software License (for > commercial use). > => are there any problems with this from a Debian point of vie

Re: Deprecation of *-gcj packages

On 13/04/2013 12:04, Matthias Klose wrote: > Am 12.04.2013 13:41, schrieb Sylvestre Ledru: >> Hello, >> >> Maybe I am missing a point but I have the feeling that the -gcj packages >> are now a bit useless. > > no. why should they be useless? As I said, it was my p

Deprecation of *-gcj packages

Hello, Maybe I am missing a point but I have the feeling that the -gcj packages are now a bit useless. gcj does not seem a very active project [1] and my perception is that not many people are using gcj packages instead of the "java package". For example, two "famous" java packages providing -gcj

Re: RFS: freeplane/1.2.23-1, simplyhtml/0.16.07-1 [ITA]

On 11/04/2013 21:17, Felix Natter wrote: > Felix Natter writes: > > hi Sylvestre, > >> Sylvestre Ledru writes: >>> I uploaded simplyhtml >> >> Thanks :-) >> >>> but I cannot upload freeplane for now. > > Does this mean that you inte

Re: RFA of some of Java packages

On 07/04/2013 16:35, Niels Thykier wrote: > jflex > - no active maintainer left I can take of this one. By the way, thanks for doing this work. Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.

Re: RFS: freeplane/1.2.23-1, simplyhtml/0.16.07-1 [ITA]

On 06/04/2013 12:29, Felix Natter wrote:> hello mentors, > > I have previously created #704789 with almost the same text > (except for the section on lintian P:/X: below) > but it seems common practice to send a mail to d-mentors and d-java as > well, so here I go. > > I am looking for a sponsor fo

Re: NMU for libjsyntaxpane-java?

On 23/03/2013 14:32, Felix Natter wrote: > hello, > > I would like to start the sponsoring process for the freeplane-1.2.22 > package, but that requires libjsyntaxpane-java 0.9.6~r156-1. [...] > So is there a chance of doing an NMU so that I can build upon the > package with freeplane 1.2.22? [1]

Re: NMU for libjsyntaxpane-java?

On 23/03/2013 14:32, Felix Natter wrote: > hello, > > I would like to start the sponsoring process for the freeplane-1.2.22 > package, but that requires libjsyntaxpane-java 0.9.6~r156-1. > > Martin Quinson (the current libjsyntaxpane-java maintainer) already > updated it and I fixed one problem a

Re: Who still cares about SVN for packaging?

On 22/03/2013 08:45, Thomas Koch wrote: > Hi, > > I remember that some people in the Debian-Java team wrote that they'd prefer > their packages to remain in SVN. But I can't find the mail thread anymore. > > And people might have changed their minds in the last months. > > Could you be so kind,

Re: Please add me to the project

On 10/03/2013 16:44, Andreas Altaïr Redmer wrote: > Hello, > > following the steps on > > http://pkg-java.alioth.debian.org/developers.html#rules > > I ask to be added to the project. I have created an account on > > alioth.debian.org > > and my account name there is

Re: Upgrading visualvm/netbeans

On 04/03/2013 20:44, Paweł Pałucha wrote: > Hi, > few days ago I tried to analyze a big Java heap dump using visualvm. > It occured to be impossible with visualvm 1.3.3 from Debian package - > took days to find anything. But it worked really good using separately > downloaded visualvm 1.3.5. So I v

Re: openjdk maintenance for wheezy and squeeze

On 18/02/2013 07:26, Andreas Kuckartz wrote: > Thanks a lot for explaining the situation and alternative paths forward. > > My view as a user: > > I only want OpenJDK7 (maybe OpenJDK8 when that becomes generally > available on September 9, 2013 :-) > > Oracle has announced that no more new publi

Re: On JOGL in Debian

Le 01/30/13 12:16, Xerxes Rånby a écrit : > 2013-01-30 09:19, Sylvestre Ledru skrev: >> On 30/01/2013 09:15, Masayuki Hatta wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> I can recommend you to test the latest JogAmp build aggregates: >>> http://jogamp.org/deployment/archive

Re: On JOGL in Debian

On 30/01/2013 09:15, Masayuki Hatta wrote: > Hi! > > Thanks for help. Now I use libjogl2-java in experimental > (2.0-rc11-1~exp4.3), and most of errors are magically gone except one > remaining: > > [javac] > /home/mhatta/work/Debian/processing/processing-read-only/processing/core/src/proce

Re: On JOGL in Debian

On 30/01/2013 05:26, Masayuki Hatta wrote: > Hi, > > I'm now trying to debianize Processing (http://processing.org). It's > almost done, but I'm stuck on some issues w.r.t. JOGL. > > Processing uses JOGL, and I want to use Debian-shipped version of JOGL > (libjogl2-java, which contains /usr/sha

Re: Bug#698164: mandate unique package names in Debian Java policy

On 14/01/2013 21:25, Tomasz Muras wrote: > On 01/14/2013 09:16 PM, Eric Lavarde wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On 14/01/13 19:48, Daniel Pocock wrote: >>> A few projects exist without following this convention, and sooner or >>> later somebody may try to package one of them. >>> >>> According to the Java L

Re: New package maintainer (assistant)

Hello, On 25/11/2012 10:23, Felix Natter wrote: > hi, > > I'm working on the freeplane-1.2.20 package with Cédric Pineau, and I > would like to have commit access (will ask before committing anything) > to svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-java/trunk/ (for freeplane and > simplyhtml-freeplane packages

Re: Status of gerrit packaging

Le 16/10/2012 16:24, Thomas Koch a écrit : > Hi, > > > I don't ask for sponsorship yet since we're in freeze and the packages still > need a final review: copyright, pbuilder test, lintian. If however somebody > wants to review and upload them to experimental I'd be more than happy! I am willing

Re: RFS: java-gnome/4.1.2-1

Le 30/08/2012 16:43, Guillaume Mazoyer a écrit : Hello, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "java-gnome" Uploaded. The package is lintian clean. You are lying ;) W: libjava-gnome-jni: hardening-no-relro usr/lib/jni/libgtkjni-4.1.2.so Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-jav

Re: RFS: libpgjava (experimental)

Le 17/08/2012 23:26, Andrew Ross a écrit : > Dear Debian Java Team members, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my update to the package libpgjava. [...] > > The package has been moved to the Debian java git repository at: > Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-java/libpostgresql-jdbc-java.git > Vc

Re: Cleanup in pkg-java subversion tree

Le 04/08/2012 20:39, Thomas Koch a écrit : > Hi, > [...] > Maybe, for the next Debian release, we can migrate the last java packages to > Git? > Please let the packages I maintain under SVN. Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscri

Re: Java Policy: /usr/share/java vs. /u/s/maven-repo

Le 04/08/2012 09:59, Thomas Koch a écrit : > Hi, > > do you think we should change the java policy and relax the requirement to > install java libraries to /usr/share/java in favour of /usr/share/maven-repo? > > At least I'd like to see a very strong recommends to install to /u/s/m-r. I > feel li

Re: glassfish-* packages no longer maintained

Le 18/07/2012 19:39, Benjamin Jaton a écrit : > Hello, > > The packages glassfish-* shipped in all the version of Debian are > version 2.1.1. > The glassfish v2 open souce code hasn't received any updates since > 2010, not even critical security updates. > ( https://svn.java.net/svn/glassfish~svn/t

Re: Bug#675495: Should not be released with Wheezy

Le 01/06/2012 16:35, Moritz Muehlenhoff a écrit : > Package: openjdk-6 > Severity: serious > > Upstream support for Java 6 ends in November: > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/eol-135779.html > > As such, we should not include it in Wheezy and fix up the > rdepends to use openjdk-7 in

Re: Prefered build system

On 23/03/2012 11:47, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote: Hi, I have been assigned to a legacy Java project, which uses several messed up Ant buildfiles. I'm going to replace or clean up the build system as part of project maintainance. I read that Maven (similar to other language-specific package man

Re: javaws / jnlp policies ?

Le lundi 05 mars 2012 à 12:36 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit : > [CC me please] > > Hi there, > > I could not find any reference for javaws and/or jnlp in the debian > policy manual. Has anyone any experience with distributing .jnlp > within debian package ? What is the jnlp location ? What i

Re: New work on java-package

Le mardi 10 janvier 2012 à 20:32 +, David Gerard a écrit : > 2012/1/10 Sylvestre Ledru : > > > As the previous maintainer of sun-java6, I am willing to sponsor (and > > maintain) it. > > > Would you have to hand whatever scripts you used to maintain it? (And >

Re: New work on java-package

Bonjour Cédric, Le dimanche 01 janvier 2012 à 22:00 +0100, Cédric Pineau a écrit : > > To build upon several threads regarding java-package, I've played with > it on my side with the hope it could find his way back in debian (I > too need clean installs of Oracle java on debian, should it only be

Re: Help with java package (beast-mcmc) needed

Hi Andreas, Le dimanche 08 janvier 2012 à 21:42 +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit : > Hi, > $ logcombiner > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: > jam/console/ConsoleApplication Usually, this kind of problem is due to the CLASSPATH not containing jam.jar Cheers, Sylvestre

Re: New libjlatexmath-java version

Hello Giovanni, Le samedi 17 décembre 2011 à 18:13 +0100, Giovanni Mascellani a écrit : > Hi Sylvestre. > > While updating the geogebra package, I discovered that geogebra depends > on some not yet release APIs of libjlatexmath, so it is not compilable > against libjlatexmath-java 0.9.6 which is

Re: openjdk-6 and openjdk-7 multiarch installable

Le mardi 27 septembre 2011 à 00:48 +0200, Matthias Klose a écrit : > On 09/26/2011 11:13 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > Well, at build time, I understand but how do you do at runtime ? There > > are programs which need to guess the actual path and which won't depend >

Re: openjdk-6 and openjdk-7 multiarch installable

Le lundi 26 septembre 2011 à 20:00 +0200, Matthias Klose a écrit : > On 09/26/2011 07:41 PM, Torsten Werner wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > >> hmm, on second thought, I think this looks wrong. at build time you always > >> have > >> the output of dpkg-architect

Re: openjdk-6 and openjdk-7 multiarch installable

Le mercredi 21 septembre 2011 à 21:20 +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan a écrit : > Hi, > > Le vendredi 02 septembre 2011 03:06:47, Matthias Klose a écrit : > > On 09/01/2011 10:46 PM, Torsten Werner wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > > >> why deleting the remainder o

saxon 9

Hello, Before I am starting to work on this, does any one started to work on the packaging of saxon 9 ? thanks, Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian

Re: openjdk-6 and openjdk-7 multiarch installable

Le jeudi 01 septembre 2011 à 22:46 +0200, Torsten Werner a écrit : > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > > why deleting the remainder of the email and not reading the email up to the > > end? > > JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk is the answer? I believe > that we wi

Re: Future of sun-java6 package ?

Le jeudi 25 août 2011 à 15:28 +0200, Julien BLACHE a écrit : > Torsten Werner wrote: > > Hi, > > >> rm of sun-java6 a target for wheezy if any security alerts come ? > > > > I think we should remove it from unstable soon. It is a good question > > What's the status of the free JVMs wrt JDBC4? >

Future of sun-java6 package ?

Hello, Dalibor Topic just replied through his blog to one of my question about the update 27 of sun-java6 being available under the dlj license: http://robilad.livejournal.com/90792.html Guys, what is your opinion about that ? rm of sun-java6 a target for wheezy if any security alerts come ? T

Re: RFS: flute-1.3-jfree (updated package)

Le mercredi 24 août 2011 à 22:38 +0100, Andrew Ross a écrit : > On 24/08/11 22:35, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Le mercredi 24 août 2011 à 22:16 +0100, Andrew Ross a écrit : > >> Dear Debian Java Team members, > >> > >> I am looking

Re: RFS: flute-1.3-jfree (updated package)

Hello, Le mercredi 24 août 2011 à 22:16 +0100, Andrew Ross a écrit : > Dear Debian Java Team members, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my update to the package flute-1.3-jfree. Is it really necessary to have the version number in the package name ? Thanks, Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: You must specify a valid ANT_HOME directory!

Le vendredi 19 août 2011 à 18:45 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit : > Here is what I now get after removing qdox : > > /tmp/buildd/fop-1.0.dfsg/src/codegen/java/org/apache/fop/tools/EventProducerCollectorTask.java > [javac] EventProducerCollector.java:35: package > com.thoughtworks.qdox does

Re: RFS: gnome-split 0.7-1 (new)

Le mardi 02 août 2011 à 21:59 +0200, Guillaume Mazoyer a écrit : > Hi Team > > I am looking for a sponsor for my new package "gnome-split". > > * Package name: gnome-split > Version : 0.7-1 > * URL : http://gnome-split.org/ > *

Re: RFS: access-modifier-checker 1.0-1 (new)

Le lundi 01 août 2011 à 10:16 +0100, James Page a écrit : > > It would be great if someone could review and upload this package for > me. > Uploaded! S -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: RFS: jenkins-task-reactor 1.3-1 (new)

Le lundi 01 août 2011 à 10:05 +0100, James Page a écrit : > Hi Team > It would be great if someone could review and upload this package for me. Uploaded! Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists

  1   2   3   >