On 02/12/2013 19:24, Andrew Ross wrote: > On 27/11/13 19:34, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >> On 26/11/2013 13:08, Vedran Miletić wrote: >>> Why is this an issue? This updates is intended for stable only. >> The issue here is that we have to upload it before in unstable (cf the >> request of the Release Manager) >> To build correctly under unstable, I need to force the usage of >> openjdk-6-jdk... >> Package that we are trying to remove ... :( > Unless removal is imminent (days, rather than weeks), then it seems > reasonable to me to depend on it for the period of time required to get > the update into stable. If I've followed the thread correctly my > understanding is that Netbeans has been broken in stable by a Java > security update, and so fixing it isn't a stupid idea. > Yeh. I tried to build it with an hardcoded dependency on java 6 but it failed.
If someone could try to build a netbeans 7.0.1+dfsg1-6 in unstable (needed before going to stable), I will upload it. S -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/529cdd30.2000...@debian.org
