On 13/04/2013 12:04, Matthias Klose wrote: > Am 12.04.2013 13:41, schrieb Sylvestre Ledru: >> Hello, >> >> Maybe I am missing a point but I have the feeling that the -gcj packages >> are now a bit useless. > > no. why should they be useless? As I said, it was my perception. Looks like I was wrong for some of them. Sorry Matthias ;)
> > 2) Fill bugs on the following packages to ask their removals. > > no. at least all of these needed to build stuff should stay. > including ecj and ant. OK. So, a step would be to figure out which one are necessary to bootstrap and the facultative one. Am I right ? > Maybe to clear your perception, please start getting OpenJDK > supported on more platforms. E.g. mips, kfreebsd, and the Hurd. I was not talking about the removing the gcj compiler. Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/516e6b74.9010...@debian.org
