Le mercredi 21 septembre 2011 à 21:20 +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan a
écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> Le vendredi 02 septembre 2011 03:06:47, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> > On 09/01/2011 10:46 PM, Torsten Werner wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Matthias Klose<d...@debian.org>  wrote:
> > >> why deleting the remainder of the email and not reading the email up to
> > >> the end?
> > > 
> > > JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk is the answer? I believe
> > > that we will see some FTBFS problems. But maybe that it might a good
> > > reason the switch to default-java.
> > 
> > openjdk-6-jre-headless now doesn't use java-6-openjdk anymore. so with the
> > appropriate conflicts, this symlink can be moved to default-jre-headless.
> 
> Now, in unstable, we didn't have /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/ symlink or 
> directory anymore. What's current plan ? Reintroduce this symlink with 
> default-jdk package ?
Currently, what I am doing now is to add "default-jre-headless" as
dependency and using /usr/lib/jvm/default-java as path.
I know this will probably fail on some archs but I found it easy and not
that dirty. 

Anyway, I think we should come up with a better solution... (probably as
a symlink as you suggest).

Sylvestre



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1316638454.5512.8.ca...@losinj.inria.fr

Reply via email to