[cc me please]
Hi there,
Could someone please remind me what are the steps to properly update
xmlgraphics-commons package ?
I tried:
% scan --download --force-download --rename
% gbp import-orig ../xmlgraphics-commons_2.7.orig.tar.gz
% debuild
[...]
gpgv: Signature made Wed 12 Jan 2022 12:24:17
[cc me please]
Hi there,
I am trying to update xmlgraphics-commons but I fail to understand
what is going on with:
% uscan --download --force-download --rename
uscan: Newest version of xmlgraphics-commons on remote site is 2.7,
local version is 2.6
uscan: => Newer package available from:
I've uploaded 1.6.0 in the mean time. I'll work on 1.7.0 whenever
maven-archiver is updated.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 11:21 AM Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
> Merci Emmanuel ! So I am stuck with
>
> [ERROR]
> /home/mathieu/debian/maven-remote-resources-plugin-1.7.0/src/m
gt; Hi Matthieu,
>
> I've created the repository:
>
>https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/maven-remote-resources-plugin
>
> You are probably missing the Salsa API key in ~/.salsarc (or the key
> expired).
>
> Emmanuel Bourg
>
>
> Le 25/03/2020 à 16:28, Mathi
Hi DD,
Could someone please setup a 'maven-remote-resources-plugin' repo
using 'setup-salsa-repository' for me ? For some reason I cannot ssh
onto salsa.debian.org using my normal ssh key.
Thanks much,
Hi there,
I tried update fop to version 2.4 (this required updating batik). I
did not realize that it did not build under sid (2.4 builds fine on
buster). Could someone comment on the compilation error, so that I can
forward something meaningful upstream:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache
> I think you can even ignore this module, I doubt it's really used.
OK. The following seems to work for me:
diff --git a/debian/libfop-java.poms b/debian/libfop-java.poms
index d9fc190a5550..29385f6bd08a 100644
--- a/debian/libfop-java.poms
+++ b/debian/libfop-java.poms
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ fop/pom
> Is junit ignored in debian/maven.ignoreRules?
Indeed, I failed to understand the role of maven.ignoreRules.
Sorry for the noise
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 5:21 PM Miroslav Kravec
wrote:
>
> > Could someone let me know if the following is an issue (*). It seems
> > batik package does not have a doc package
> >
> > https://packages.qa.debian.org/b/batik.html
>
> I don't think it's an issue. From end user's perspective, you need
Hi there,
Could someone let me know if the following is an issue (*). It seems
batik package does not have a doc package
https://packages.qa.debian.org/b/batik.html
Thanks
(*)
Checking dependencies for documentation packages...
> dpkg --search /usr/share/doc/ant/api/index.html
Found ant
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 11:42 AM Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
> Dear fop-dev,
>
> I am trying to update fop in Debian archive to the latest release. I
> see that the main build system switched from ant to mvn.
>
> Could someone please point to the instructions on how to build f
Dear fop-dev,
I am trying to update fop in Debian archive to the latest release. I
see that the main build system switched from ant to mvn.
Could someone please point to the instructions on how to build fop
from source with hyph (mandatory for a Debian package) ?
All I could find is old document
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 11:57 AM Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> Le 14/11/2018 à 11:25, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
>
> > What would you recommend in this case ?
>
> For junit this substitution rule should work:
>
> junit junit * s/.*/4.x/ * *
>
Hi Emmanuel,
I believe I understand now why mh_make was getting confused all along
with junit4/xmlgraphics-commons. It turns out that fop made the
version of those configurable from the top-level parent to the
children, eg:
$ cd fop
$ cat fop-events/pom.xml
...
org.apache.xmlgraphics
Hi there,
Depending on the order of the binary package in d/control, I get a
different build. How can I specify for src:fop package that I'd like
to build libfop-java and not fop.
Otherwise it fails with:
dh binary --buildsystem=maven
dh_update_autotools_config -O--buildsystem=maven
dh_aut
an.org/java-team/fop/commit/f9ae8952bf7bc0e063a13d04461793cd6c39360a
3. build the doc
to be continued
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 1:00 PM Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
> Hi Emmanuel,
>
> Do you believe this is the correct patch:
>
> https://salsa.debian.
Hi there,
When building fop, I'd like to skip building the following source file:
./fop-core/src/main/java/org/apache/fop/util/bitmap/JAIMonochromeBitmapConverter.java
Back in the old 'ant' days, this was done by upstream with:
build.xml:
Since debian does not ship jai-core/jai-imageio-cor
Hi Emmanuel,
Do you believe this is the correct patch:
https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/fop/commit/9eb16e6f7b3fc024147b8eeba2b0a9d2d243e463
For reference:
diff --git a/fop-servlet/pom.xml b/fop-servlet/pom.xml
index 609c479..46873fe 100644
--- a/fop-servlet/pom.xml
+++ b/fop-servlet/pom.xml
@
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 6:42 PM Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 5:28 PM Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> >
> > Le 09/11/2018 à 16:46, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
> >
> > > Odd, this
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 5:28 PM Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> Le 09/11/2018 à 16:46, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
>
> > Odd, this is even worse:
> >
> > [INFO]
> >
> > [ERROR] Unknown lif
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 4:22 PM Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> Le 09/11/2018 à 16:16, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
>
> > Odd, this does not seems to work for me:
> >
> > https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/fop/blob/wip-2.3/debian/rules
>
> Sorry I forgot "
Salut Emmanuel,
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 4:00 PM Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> Le 09/11/2018 à 15:48, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
>
> > What do I need to tweak to get a verbose mvn output in:
> >
> > https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/fop/blob/wip-2.3
Hi there,
What do I need to tweak to get a verbose mvn output in:
https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/fop/blob/wip-2.3/debian/rules
Currently it fails with a mysterious:
...
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.8.0:compile
(default-compile) on project f
Emmanuel,
I started a branch wip-2.3 in salsa/fop:
https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/fop/commits/wip-2.3
All I did is:
1. Inject 2.3 tarball from upstream
2. Ran (with your previous directions): $ mh_make -v -t false -d false
3. Edit debian/maven.rules to try to fix the issue with batik.
Now i
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 1:52 PM Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2018, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
> > Could someone please point me to the documentation for injecting a new
> > release in git on salsa. I am specifically looking for injecting fop
>
> I normal
Hi there,
Could someone please point me to the documentation for injecting a new
release in git on salsa. I am specifically looking for injecting fop
2.3 in: https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/fop
Thanks
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 10:40 AM Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> [Mathieu Malaterre]
> > Hi there,
> >
> > Any good soul out there to help me jump start packaging for fop
> > 2.2/2.3. fop 2.1 package was using ant as build tool, but since 2.2
> > mvn is required
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 3:24 PM Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> Le 27/06/2018 à 15:16, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
>
> >> Are you sure libbatik-java is installed?
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > libbatik-java:
> > Installed: 1.8-4+deb9u1
> > Candidate: 1.
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 3:01 PM Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> Le 27/06/2018 à 14:09, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
>
> > Still the same:
> >
> > In fop-servlet/pom.xml: This dependency cannot be found in the Debian
> > Maven repository. Ignore this dependency?
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 1:57 PM Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> Le 27/06/2018 à 13:31, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
>
> > I can get a little further. 3 errors I'd like to resolve:
> >
> > 1.
> > dpkg failed to execute successfully
> > Found
> > /usr/s
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 1:57 PM Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> Le 27/06/2018 à 13:31, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
>
> > I can get a little further. 3 errors I'd like to resolve:
> >
> > 1.
> > dpkg failed to execute successfully
> > Found
> > /usr/s
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 12:33 PM Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> Le 27/06/2018 à 12:30, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
>
> > What should I do with:
> >
> >> dpkg --search /usr/share/maven-repo/junit/junit/*/*
> > Found /usr/share/maven-repo/junit/junit/4.x/junit-4.
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 12:24 PM Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> Le 27/06/2018 à 09:57, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
>
> > Any good soul out there to help me jump start packaging for fop
> > 2.2/2.3. fop 2.1 package was using ant as build tool, but since 2.2
&g
Hi there,
Any good soul out there to help me jump start packaging for fop
2.2/2.3. fop 2.1 package was using ant as build tool, but since 2.2
mvn is required. I am not familiar with mvn to even start the
packaging.
Thanks much,
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 30/01/2017 à 10:22, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
>
>> Thanks for the quick response. By any chance do you know how to
>> specify this option in an ant build.xml file ? I could not find any
>> documentation
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 30/01/2017 à 08:40, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
>
>> Could someone let me know what happen *very* recently to Java ? Fop
>> can no longer be build:
>>
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
[CC me please]
Hi there,
Could someone let me know what happen *very* recently to Java ? Fop
can no longer be build:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=852910
> [javadoc] Constructing Javadoc information...
> [javadoc]
> /<>/src/java/org/apache/fop/util/bitmap/JAIMonochromeBi
Hi there,
I am starring at debian-devel@l.d.o and debian-java@l.d.o but see no
discussion about gcj removal. Am I missing something or was this
something known to everybody (porters mainly).
-M
[CC me please]
Hi there,
Could someone please confirm that all jar files should be compiled
with source and target version number set to 1.5 ?
I am starring at the following:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-med/gdcm.git/commit/?id=673e34b58867471a90e2fd70b30d442ecd16f505
and I believe t
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Erich Schubert, le Mon 17 Aug 2015 10:28:27 +0200, a écrit :
>> I will take care of uploading a new ELKI package (probably end of the
>> month, or beginning of september).
>> It will have a version number of at least "0.7.0~20150
I mode unusable, unless you disable GTK accessibility
> in openjdk.
>
> Ubuntu has added a package called "jayatana", which seems to break
> many Java applications, too - including ELKI:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jayatana/+bug/1441487
>
> Regard
Erich,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Erich Schubert wrote:
> I will take care of uploading a new ELKI package (probably end of the
> month, or beginning of september).
> It will have a version number of at least "0.7.0~20150817-1", which is
>> 0.6.5, so above breaks is okay.
Any news on the
[CC me please]
Hi there,
Does anyone understand the following `excuse`:
https://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=fop
[...]
xmlgraphics-commons is only 0 days old. It must be 5 days old to go in.
[...]
Thanks much,
Erich,
Thanks for the report about batik API compat. Could you be a little more
verbose on what was needed to fix ELKI ? I see that that
import org.apache.batik.dom.svg.SVGDOMImplementation;
is still used in the ELKI (from sid).
I am trying to understand if this is possible to upload 1.8 to sid
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Jerome Robert wrote:
> On 15/07/2015 11:47, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> >
> > From my understanding batik-libs would be equivalent to loading each
> > and every batik-* components. If so this means I broke something when
> > updating
[CC me please]
I am trying to get fop 2.0 in experimental. For this, I need to update
batik to 1.8. I thought the patch would be trivial: refresh the patches.
However it still does not work. Right now I am stuck on (see copy at[*]):
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=792132#19
>
[CC me please]
Hi team,
Anyone working on updating fop and xmlgraphics-commons ?
Thanks
Package: java-common
Version: 0.52
Severity: normal
-- Forwarded message --
Le 29/04/2015 12:30, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
> That's exactly my point. AFAIK the debian policy requires that we
> target 1.5. Which means my gdcm.jar will *not* work with an older 1.
. It just says that the
> compiled class may not work with Java 5, but I don't think it can be
> responsible for a build failure.
>
> Emmanuel Bourg
>
>
> Le 29/04/2015 10:03, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
>> [CC me please]
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
[CC me please]
Hi,
Could someone please describe how bad is this warning:
warning: [options] bootstrap class path not set in conjunction with -source 1.5
>From my reading o:
http://stackoverflow.com/a/12050087/136285
It seems that we should get rid of this warning ASAP in debian
archive, right
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
[...]
> Actually what was the reasoning behind the choice to use a custom shell
> script like jarwrapper instead of jexec to register executable jars with
> binfmt-misc? This question also came up in the bug report.
Here is my guess:
`jexec`
[CC me please]
Could someone please describe what is going with binfmts and jar files ?
This is a followup from #764630. On my brand new jessie (amd64) system
I can see:
$ cat /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc/jar
enabled
interpreter /usr/bin/jexec
flags:
offset 0
magic 504b0304
while:
$ cat /proc/sys/
[CC me please]
Quick question: is 1.5 the JRE version targetted for jessie ? 1.7 is
the only version not end-of-life:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html
thx
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> On 2013-12-10 16:03, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>>> [CC me please]
>>>
>>> I am currently starring at:
>>>
>>> h
Hi Niels,
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2013-12-10 16:03, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> [CC me please]
>>
>> I am currently starring at:
>>
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731778
>>
>> Apparently java.l
[CC me please]
I am currently starring at:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731778
Apparently java.library.path is not automatically set for this user.
Does anyone know a way to dump the list of java.library.path at
runtime ?
Thanks for advices,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
severity 676618 important
user 676618 multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
usertags 676618 multiarch
thanks
I am wondering if this make sense to remove /usr/lib/jni from openjdk
and al. since we now have /usr/lib/$(DEB_MULTIARCH)/jni
$ cat openjdk-6-6b27-1.12.6/debian/patches/deb-multiarch-ori
Eugene,
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Eugene Zhukov wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Eugene Zhukov wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I uploaded latest TestNG release package to mentors [1].
>> Would you please take a look when you have time?
>>
>> There is one thing I couldn't get right yet, jh_repack
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/libjdepend-java
Tagged + Uploaded.
Thanks !
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/libjaxen-java
Here is what I get:
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[INFO]
[INFO] Building jaxen
[INFO]task-segment: [package]
[I
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/jta
Why do I see:
W missing-classpath
libgnu-regexp-java, libjdom1-java
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listma
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Eugene Zhukov wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Eugene Zhukov wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> How to add jarwrapper dependency (functionality) to a package
>
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Eugene Zhukov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> How to add jarwrapper dependency (functionality) to a package
> debianized with mh_make?
> Simply adding it to depends in d/control seems to have no effect.
Here is what I did in jiipview:
$ cat debian/jiipview.links
usr/share/ja
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
[...]
> After that, which should not take very long, I have several things in mind:
> * Draft of the packaging of openjdk 8 (of course, this would be done in
> coordination with you)
> - Rebuild of the archive with it
> - Report bugs ups
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 6:18 PM, tony mancill wrote:
> On 05/24/2013 08:08 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have updated some Maven plugins and I get a lintian warning stating
>>>
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have updated some Maven plugins and I get a lintian warning stating
> the package is missing a public jar in /usr/share/java. It seems the
> previous packages had the jar files in /usr/share/java, but now we only
> get them in /usr
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking for a sponsor for the new package opencsv (ITP: #709171).
Uploaded. Thanks for your contribution !
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Thomas Koch wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 21, 2013 01:04:19 AM Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I stumbled on a bug with mh_make that was preventing the dependencies
>> from being resolved when clojure1.2 was installed. This issue had been
>> reported already twic
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> I gave it a try and got the following warnings:
>
> W: plexus-resources source:
> package-needs-versioned-debhelper-build-depends 8
> P: libplexus-resources-java: no-upstream-changelog
> W: libplexus-resources-java: new-package-should-close-
Dear all,
I am trying to upload Eugene recent work on plexus-resources, which
can be found at:
svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-java/trunk/plexus-resources
And/or:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/plexus-resources
If I try to build the package from my system using pdebuild, I keep
getting
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Does anyone know how to activate hardening flags in dh_nativejava ?
>
> I tried:
>
> $ cat debian/rules
> [...]
> AOT_GCJFLAGS:=$(shell dpkg-buildflags --get CFLAGS)
> AOT_LDFLAGS:=$(shell dpkg-buildflags --get
If anyone is interested (or bored !), it would be nice to have Saxon
HE in debian:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708214
Thanks,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arch
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 14/05/2013 16:32, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
>
>> That was *precisely* the point of this thread :)
>
> Glad to help :)
>
>
>> I'll add a new package: pixelmed-apps-java which will provide the JNLP
&g
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 14/05/2013 15:25, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
>
>> Then simply points your web browser to
>> http://localhost/pixelmed/DicomCleaner.html (for example).
>
> I tried that and launched one of the applications. If I&
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 14/05/2013 14:55, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
>
>> I believe the intention is that apps are to be run locally. Eg,
>> upstream has its own web pages at:
>>
>> http://www.dclunie.com/pixelmed/software/
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 14/05/2013 14:21, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
>
>> Here is my attempt at packaging JNLP apps within debian-java:
>>
>> I think I could also offer those JNLP as standalone apps, rather than
>> launched v
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Mathieu Malaterre
wrote:
> I could not find any reference for javaws and/or jnlp in the debian
> policy manual. Has anyone any experience with distributing .jnlp
> within debian package ? What is the jnlp location ? What is the helper
> script (j
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Eugene Zhukov wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> Eugene,
>>
>> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Eugene Zhukov wrote:
>>> I just uploaded two other prerequisite packages:
>>> https://ment
Does anyone know how to activate hardening flags in dh_nativejava ?
I tried:
$ cat debian/rules
[...]
AOT_GCJFLAGS:=$(shell dpkg-buildflags --get CFLAGS)
AOT_LDFLAGS:=$(shell dpkg-buildflags --get LDFLAGS)
with no luck so far.
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debi
Eugene,
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Eugene Zhukov wrote:
> I just uploaded two other prerequisite packages:
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/plexus-resources
According to your d/copyright plexus-resources is Apache 2.0, this is
not the case at least in your package. Please change that.
e upstream source tarball
> * Updated Standards-Version to 3.9.4 (no changes)
>
> [ Mathieu Malaterre ]
> * Remove self from Uploaders
>
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/libjoda-time-java
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libj/libjoda-time-java/libjoda-
Emmanuel,
You do not need --team when dch'ing the d/changelog file, since you
append your name to the Uploaders: list.
Thanks for your help !
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After joda-time here comes the expected update of joda-convert.
>
> Here is the ch
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On a related note, would it make sense to deploy something like "shlibs"
> files for Java? I have experimented with adding "symbols" files in the
> past and they tend to be rather large if every symbol must be covered.
> Though if we reduce
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Eugene Zhukov wrote:
> I incorporated the changes and resubmitted to mentors.debian.net.
> Some comments below in-line:
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Mathieu Malaterre
> wrote:
>> 7. I do not believe this is a good idea to move
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Thomas Koch wrote:
> Mathieu Malaterre:
>> Would it be possible to make this package have something like:
>> Provides: libjson-java to be able to find it more easily.
>
> After I sent you the mail I had second thoughts. Is it a good thing
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Thomas Koch wrote:
> Mathieu Malaterre:
>> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> > On 2013-04-12 15:49, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> >> Does anyone know where is the json java package ?
>
> The original json.o
Does anyone knows why I would be getting:
[javac]
/home/mathieu/debian/collab/deb-maint/jheliosviewer/trunk/jhelioviewer-2.2.1/src/jhv/src/org/helioviewer/jhv/io/DataSources.java:190:
cannot find symbol
[javac] symbol : constructor JSONTokener(java.io.Reader)
[javac] location: class
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2013-04-12 15:49, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> Does anyone know where is the json java package ?
>>
>> All I could find is:
>>
>> http://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=rowToJSONArray
>>
&
Does anyone know where is the json java package ?
All I could find is:
http://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=rowToJSONArray
But the json package seems incomplete:
cannot find symbol
[javac] symbol : class XML
[javac] location: package org.json
[javac] import org.json.XML;
[java
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Maybe I am missing a point but I have the feeling that the -gcj packages
> are now a bit useless.
> gcj does not seem a very active project [1] and my perception is that
> not many people are using gcj packages instead
> of the "
Eugene,
1.
If you have your account on alioth registered, could you please edit
directly the xslthl package for the following comments:
2.
I would like to know exactly why this patch is needed:
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/pkg-java/trunk/xslthl/debian/patches/pom_fixes.patch?view=markup
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Eugene Zhukov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>>
>> Eugene,
>>
>> * Could you please add a get-orig-pom rule which `wget` the pom file.
>> I'd like to know where the pom file is coming fr
Eugene,
* Could you please add a get-orig-pom rule which `wget` the pom file.
I'd like to know where the pom file is coming from.
* Do not bump std-vers unless you specify it explicitely in d/changelog
As a side note if you are part of debian-java team, simply use dch --team
Thanks,
On Tue, Apr
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 27/03/2013 10:49, Torsten Werner a écrit :
>
>> I recommend orig-tar.sh because I've invented the name but probably not
>> the underlying idea. Uupdate is from the old age where version control
>> systems have not been used for Debian pac
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 12:32 AM, Hilko Bengen wrote:
> * Sylvestre Ledru:
>
>> Asking several times the same question won't help you with that ...
>> You should focus on packaging itself.
>
> Way to go, telling people in a largely volunteer-based community what
> their priorities should be...
We
Thomas,
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Thomas Koch wrote:
> Eugene Zhukov:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm new to maven-debian-helper and maven-repo-helper. I'm trying to
>> package xslthl-2.1.0.
>> I built initial package structure with mh_make, and it was able to
>> find necessary jars in /usr/share/jav
Hi Eugene,
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Eugene Zhukov wrote:
> My name is Eugene Zhukov. I do Java programming for a living and my favorite
> operating system is Debian.
> With that said I do know something about some Java packages in Debian,
> e.g. I packaged Tomcat 7.0.33 for my Wheezy as u
Hi,
I have been trying to understand what is going on wrong with
libquartz2-java maven packaging. I need to rename the quartz.jar into
quartz2.jar. Could someone have a quick look at:
svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-java/trunk/libquartz2-java
Or, is it possible to simply declare a conflic
Uploaded with javahelper (still pending in NEW).
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am working toward having fop 1.1 in debian/experimental. I need
> first to update xmlgraphics-commons. I did some cleanup and now I have
> the documentat
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:57 AM, brian m. carlson
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:55:22AM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> Could you please confirm whether or not patches for #605940, #605941
>> can safely be removed from xmlgraphics-commons 1.5 ? Did you forward
>>
1 - 100 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
