On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Markus Koschany <a...@gambaru.de> wrote: [...] > Actually what was the reasoning behind the choice to use a custom shell > script like jarwrapper instead of jexec to register executable jars with > binfmt-misc? This question also came up in the bug report.
Here is my guess: `jexec` only works with openjdk installed. At one point debian had multiple java implementation (sun, kaffe...). These days only two really remains, so maybe an easier solution would be to have a `gcj-exec` provided by `gcj-jdk` to mimic openjdk package. Which means it would be much easier to handle the LD_LIBRARY_PATH issue within the `gcj-exec` executable. jarwrapper is only really needed with a custom jre installation... 2cts -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CA+7wUszoBKKHD6Y3ALvvDQNnhV_rj6jGOtvFO7CPHwtHzQ=v...@mail.gmail.com
