On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 5:21 PM Miroslav Kravec <kravec.miros...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Could someone let me know if the following is an issue (*). It seems > > batik package does not have a doc package > > > > https://packages.qa.debian.org/b/batik.html > > I don't think it's an issue. From end user's perspective, you need > only man pages for applications, but don't need docs for libraries. Of > course, high quality software would have docs, and integration > tests,.. but, that's something different.
OK, great. Do you have a suggestion why I do not see any single html page generated after `debuild` in fop package ?
