On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:57 AM, brian m. carlson <sand...@crustytoothpaste.net> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:55:22AM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> Could you please confirm whether or not patches for #605940, #605941 >> can safely be removed from xmlgraphics-commons 1.5 ? Did you forward >> issues upstream (link would be nice). Did they agree with your >> proposed changes ? > > Do you have a package against which I can test? As far as the patches, > when I forward a bug upstream, I set the forwarded flag in the Debian > BTS. From the upstream BTS, it looks like the patch for 605941 has been > accepted, and the other one is still pending; it looks like the Apache > BTS didn't accept the comment I tried to email it. I don't really have > the time (or the desire) to learn how to write JUnit tests in order to > satisfy upstream, so until someone does that, the latter patch will > probably not go in and Debian will have to carry it.
I have uploaded fop 1.1 to experimental, you can give it a try to your test suite. You'll need xmlgraphics-common, it is currently in NEW queue, but you can find a copy here: http://mentors.debian.net/package/xmlgraphics-commons Thanks, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/ca+7wusy60psk6bbt6mf0_ta6czaqubc1j7govwtz0cs_vbu...@mail.gmail.com
