On Friday 05 November 2004 19:47, "Francesco P. Lovergine"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 01:35:28AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > My clftools package allows you to split and mangle the log files if you
> > have Apache configured for a single log file...
>
> Uhm, not found
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 09:40:28AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 09:09:16AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > > For ErrorLog you can pipe to a suitable program which does the same.
> >
> > but this doesn't. unless apache has added this feature since i last looked
>
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 09:40:28AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 09:09:16AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > > For ErrorLog you can pipe to a suitable program which does the same.
> >
> > but this doesn't. unless apache has added this feature since i last looked
>
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 09:54:18AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst,,, wrote:
> >
> > ErrorLog "| mytrickyprog www.mydomain.com"
>
> Then what's the use? The point was to avoid having ErrorLog directives
> per vhost, since that increases the number of open files.
>
I'm not an expert of apache internals,
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 01:35:28AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> My clftools package allows you to split and mangle the log files if you have
> Apache configured for a single log file...
>
Uhm, not found in current sid archive
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 09:09:16AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > For ErrorLog you can pipe to a suitable program which does the same.
>
> but this doesn't. unless apache has added this feature since i last looked
> into this (about six months ago) the "suitable program" has no way of
> separati
On 04.11.2004 23:09, Craig Sanders wrote:
For ErrorLog you can pipe to a suitable program which does the same.
but this doesn't. unless apache has added this feature since i last looked
into this (about six months ago) the "suitable program" has no way of
separating the error logs for each virtual
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 11:19:22AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> I personally prefer a single CustomLog file with a suitable domain
> prefix for every domain. That allows a nice grepping to extract
> information and avoid resources wasting.
yes, this works.
> For ErrorLog you can pipe
On Thursday 04 November 2004 09:11, Marek Podmaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have apache 1.3 webserver hosting about 150 domains (more than 400
> virtual hosts). Now I have separate error log for each domain
My clftools package allows you to split and mangle the log files if you have
Apac
Instead of setting ulimit in an init script, you can set it in the
file /etc/security/limits.conf
like this:
www-data hardnofile 4096
www-data softnofile 8192
I'm not sure what hard and soft really mean, they're discribed as:
# can have the two value
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 11:11:13PM +0100, Marek Podmaka wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have apache 1.3 webserver hosting about 150 domains (more than 400
> virtual hosts). Now I have separate error log for each domain
> (something.sk) and separate combined log for each virtual host (for
> example w
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 11:11:13PM +0100, Marek Podmaka wrote:
> I have apache 1.3 webserver hosting about 150 domains (more than 400
> virtual hosts). Now I have separate error log for each domain
> (something.sk) and separate combined log for each virtual host (for
> example www.abcq.sk a
Marek Podmaka wrote:
Hello,
I have apache 1.3 webserver hosting about 150 domains (more than 400
virtual hosts). Now I have separate error log for each domain
(something.sk) and separate combined log for each virtual host (for
example www.abcq.sk and new.abcq.sk). This has many positives for
m
On Wednesday 06 October 2004 04:15, Daniele Becchi wrote:
> Is it possible to use the Deny directive in to block IP
> addresses that don't have a PTR record?
It should be possible. Read http://httpd.apache.org/docs/env.html it states:
Access to the server can be controlled based on the val
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wieslaw wrote:
| Hi
|
|>
|> Is it possible to use the Deny directive in to block IP
|> addresses that don't have a PTR record?
|
| Yes. You should put a IP address, or domain (A record)
|
| I tested on apache 1.3 and 2.0
|
it works if i write
Deny xxx.
On September 22, 2004 07:44 am, Johann Botha wrote:
> >
> > php_admin_flag engine off
> >
>
> hmm.. thats where I stopped investigating this option,
> I dont want to be editing config files.
Neither do I but in my case I anticipate 95% of the hosts being identical, if
I have to
On September 22, 2004 10:10 am, Raúl Alexis Betancort Santana wrote:
> I wonder how running a script inside a mod_rewrite rule is better that
> defining a new NameVirtualHost directive, moreover taking into account that
It's better (IMO) because I do not have to configure apache. My admin
inter
El Miércoles 22 Septiembre 2004 12:12, Fraser Campbell escribió:
> On September 22, 2004 03:04 am, Johann Botha wrote:
> > running a script from mod_rewrite was not reliable, sometimes it just did
> > not work... restart apache and it worked again. maybe it was just the
> > version I used.
>
> Hmm,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Fraser >@2004.09.22_13:12:19_GMT+0200
> > 2) I wanted to enable / disable things like PHPengine for the virtual
> > ? ?host based on LDAP settings.
>
> You could do it in the script, if file extension is .php th
On September 22, 2004 03:04 am, Johann Botha wrote:
> running a script from mod_rewrite was not reliable, sometimes it just did
> not work... restart apache and it worked again. maybe it was just the
> version I used.
Hmm, I don't like the sounds of that. Hopefully it was just the version you
u
Hi Fraser >@2004.09.22_03:13:17_GMT+0200
> I finally got around to trying out mod_rewrite and it looks like things will
> work exactly as I'd hoped.
> Obviously under this scheme all hostnames get treated the same, you would have
> to override the defaults in
Hi,
I finally got around to trying out mod_rewrite and it looks like things will
work exactly as I'd hoped. I'm posting this recipe since I was unable to
find a documented example of how to do it and I figured lots of people might
be interested in doing it. It does need some more testing but
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 08:21:26PM +0200, Patrick Donker wrote:
> Jacob S. wrote:
>
> >By default, when a file is uploaded via a php script or anything else
> >through apache, it has permissions of 644. I would like this to be 640.
> >
> >I know php has a umask and a chmod function that could help
Jacob S. wrote:
By default, when a file is uploaded via a php script or anything else
through apache, it has permissions of 644. I would like this to be 640.
I know php has a umask and a chmod function that could help with this,
but this only fixes it for scripts that use php. Isn't there a way to
If you want to change (or remove) the apache banner, have a gander (before
you compile it, etc) at:
apache_1.3.29/src/include/httpd.h
& grep for '1.3.29'
HTH.
> you can turn if off with mod_rewrite so it does not show product type at
> all.
> I couldn't get it to work, but you could do it
If you want to change (or remove) the apache banner, have a gander (before
you compile it, etc) at:
apache_1.3.29/src/include/httpd.h
& grep for '1.3.29'
HTH.
> you can turn if off with mod_rewrite so it does not show product type at
> all.
> I couldn't get it to work, but you could do it
you can turn if off with mod_rewrite so it does not show product type at all.
I couldn't get it to work, but you could do it
Fraser Campbell said:
>> the ServerSignature directive to switch it off.
> ServerSignature On
> ServerTokens Prod
you can turn if off with mod_rewrite so it does not show product type at all.
I couldn't get it to work, but you could do it
Fraser Campbell said:
>> the ServerSignature directive to switch it off.
> ServerSignature On
> ServerTokens Prod
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
On Tuesday 06 April 2004 10:39, Robert Page wrote:
> I think to actually change it you need to edit the source but you can use
> the ServerSignature directive to switch it off.
I use these directives:
ServerSignature On
ServerTokens Prod
This way people know I'm running apache (which I don'
I think to actually change it you need to edit the source but you can use
the ServerSignature directive to switch it off.
-Original Message-
From: Craig Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 April 2004 15:03
To: debian-security@lists.debian.org; debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Subject
On Tuesday 06 April 2004 10:39, Robert Page wrote:
> I think to actually change it you need to edit the source but you can use
> the ServerSignature directive to switch it off.
I use these directives:
ServerSignature On
ServerTokens Prod
This way people know I'm running apache (which I don'
I think to actually change it you need to edit the source but you can use
the ServerSignature directive to switch it off.
-Original Message-
From: Craig Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 April 2004 15:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Apache banner
Hi Guys
Frontpage Extensions on a debian box
with apache I suggest u first try out WebDAV (www.webdav.org).
Thanks For those who helped/replied to my post :)
Dave
-Original Message-
From: mimo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 March 2004 03:23
To: David Ross
Cc: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
S
Frontpage Extensions on a debian box
with apache I suggest u first try out WebDAV (www.webdav.org).
Thanks For those who helped/replied to my post :)
Dave
-Original Message-
From: mimo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 March 2004 03:23
To: David Ross
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
I have managed to set this up using mod-mirfak
(libapache-mod-frontpage-mirfak). I think I had to hack it a bit - let
me know if it doesnt work immediately.
mimo
David Ross wrote:
Hi All
I am trying to install FrontPage Extensions support with Apache 1.3.26
on a Debian Woody box. I got the patch
I have managed to set this up using mod-mirfak
(libapache-mod-frontpage-mirfak). I think I had to hack it a bit - let
me know if it doesnt work immediately.
mimo
David Ross wrote:
Hi All
I am trying to install FrontPage Extensions support with Apache 1.3.26
on a Debian Woody box. I got the pa
On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 17:42, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 02:14, Timo Veith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > today I noticed that 2 apache procs are using all cpu. ps shows them like
>
> One thing I have done in the past to deal with such problems is to put
> "ulimit -t 600" in the sta
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 02:14, Timo Veith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> today I noticed that 2 apache procs are using all cpu. ps shows them like
One thing I have done in the past to deal with such problems is to put
"ulimit -t 600" in the start script for apache. Then when apache processes
got into
At 04:47 PM 2/28/2004, Timo Veith wrote:
I will investigate this a little more, but I don't think I will compile my
own apache binary for this issue. Anyway I will tell the user to stop his
chat thing.
Timo, there are chats out there which may behave less, uh, poorly than this
particular one. The
Thank you for your help Jeff.
I will investigate this a little more, but I don't think I will compile my
own apache binary for this issue. Anyway I will tell the user to stop his
chat thing.
Again, thanks a lot.
Kind regards,
Timo
Am Samstag, 28. Februar 2004 20:56 schrieb Jeff S Wheeler:
>
Regarding that mail filtering message, that seems to have come from some
third party who reads the list. I guess it is not mailing list aware.
On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 15:14, Marty Landman wrote:
> Jeff, do you think that the apps are trying to flock the file? I'm curious
> what the app level issue
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 02:56:12PM -0500, Jeff S Wheeler wrote:
>
> PHP is the single biggest cause of shared server problems at my company.
> I wish the PHP CGI stuff worked right, as if it did, we would opt to use
> that instead of the Apache PHP module. It may be slower, but at least
> that wo
At 02:56 PM 2/28/2004, Jeff S Wheeler wrote:
Barring that, though, what your apache processes are doing is trying to
read that file, /home/jebu0001/homepage/jens/chat/php_chat_log, over and
over again, most likely in a `tail -f` nature, but no new data is appearing.
Jeff, do you think that the a
On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 13:48, Timo Veith wrote:
> apache 24290 root8r REG 8,17 13115 25739308
> /home/jebu0001/homepage/jens/chat/php_chat_log
> I tried gdb, but there are no debug symbols,
> that's the default with most debian packages I assume.
It's a shame the debug symbols aren'
Hi,
here are my results. I put off line breaks because of the long lines. Hope
thats ok.
Am Samstag, 28. Februar 2004 17:37 schrieb Jeff S Wheeler:
> ... and issue `lsof -p
> `, then take note of the FD column in the output. That indicates
> which file descriptor is being examined, and of course
On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 10:14, Timo Veith wrote:
> This is the output of strace:
>
> read(8, "", 4096) = 0
> read(8, "", 4096) = 0
> read(8, "", 4096) = 0
> read(8, "", 4096) = 0
> looping forever as it
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 04:05:15PM +0100, Erik D?rnbach wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> > untested, quick and dirty
> >
> > #!/usr/bin/perl
> >
> > while (<>) {
> >($username, $password)=split /:/, $_, 2;
chomp($password);
> >system("/usr/bin/htpasswd", "-b", "/path/to/htaccess",
> > $
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 04:05:15PM +0100, Erik D?rnbach wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> > untested, quick and dirty
> >
> > #!/usr/bin/perl
> >
> > while (<>) {
chomp;
> >($username, $password)=split /:/, $_, 2;
> >system("/usr/bin/htpasswd", "-b", "/path/to/htaccess",
> > $username, $pa
Hi again,
> untested, quick and dirty
>
> #!/usr/bin/perl
>
> while (<>) {
>($username, $password)=split /:/, $_, 2;
>system("/usr/bin/htpasswd", "-b", "/path/to/htaccess",
> $username, $password);
> }
Mmmh, I'm not sure why, it looks right, but now I noticed, it doesn't
work. The outp
On Fri Feb 20, 2004 at 12:0533PM +0100, Erik Dörnbach wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> just a quickie, I need to add a massive load of users for apache
> authentication, I have the usernames and associated passwords in
> a plain text file, one line per user like:
>
> :
> :
> ...
>
> Database auth would
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 17:27, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 03:05:34PM +0100, Jan Kokoska wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 12:30, Francis Tyers wrote:
> > > hmm, you might want to look into mysql replication, i just googled and
> > > got:
> > >
> > > http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/Re
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 03:05:34PM +0100, Jan Kokoska wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 12:30, Francis Tyers wrote:
> > hmm, you might want to look into mysql replication, i just googled and
> > got:
> >
> > http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/Replication.html
> > http://jeremy.zawodny.com/mysql/managing-mys
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 17:27, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 03:05:34PM +0100, Jan Kokoska wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 12:30, Francis Tyers wrote:
> > > hmm, you might want to look into mysql replication, i just googled and
> > > got:
> > >
> > > http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/Re
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 03:05:34PM +0100, Jan Kokoska wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 12:30, Francis Tyers wrote:
> > hmm, you might want to look into mysql replication, i just googled and
> > got:
> >
> > http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/Replication.html
> > http://jeremy.zawodny.com/mysql/managing-mys
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 12:30, Francis Tyers wrote:
> hmm, you might want to look into mysql replication, i just googled and
> got:
>
> http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/Replication.html
> http://jeremy.zawodny.com/mysql/managing-mysql-replication.html
> if you are on a lower budget, perhaps look at rsyn
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 12:30, Francis Tyers wrote:
> hmm, you might want to look into mysql replication, i just googled and
> got:
>
> http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/Replication.html
> http://jeremy.zawodny.com/mysql/managing-mysql-replication.html
> if you are on a lower budget, perhaps look at rsyn
hmm, you might want to look into mysql replication, i just googled and
got:
http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/Replication.html
http://jeremy.zawodny.com/mysql/managing-mysql-replication.html
as for apache, will you be using dynamic or static pages?
you might want to look at a shared filesystem maybe?
hmm, you might want to look into mysql replication, i just googled and
got:
http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/Replication.html
http://jeremy.zawodny.com/mysql/managing-mysql-replication.html
as for apache, will you be using dynamic or static pages?
you might want to look at a shared filesystem maybe?
I am not sure (cause I do not have ssh to your machine) but I think you are
using wrong php.ini file
Accroding to this one there is NO zend optimizer.
Look for correct php.ini in /usr/local/Zend/etc/php.ini
Peter
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Holze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thu
I am not sure (cause I do not have ssh to your machine) but I think you are
using wrong php.ini file
Accroding to this one there is NO zend optimizer.
Look for correct php.ini in /usr/local/Zend/etc/php.ini
Peter
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Holze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PR
On 05 Jan 2004 20:13 CET you wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>
> Mine segfaults on cold-start but only with php4 module loaded and
> have done so for quite a while.
ii apache 1.3.29.0.1-3 Versatile, high-performance HTTP server
ii apache-common 1.3.29.0.1-3 Support files for all Apache web
Hi!
Mine segfaults on cold-start but only with php4 module loaded and
have done so for quite a while.
I figured out that, at least in my case, this works ...
I comment out the php4 module and 'apachectl start',
then uncomment it and 'apachectl restart' ...
All modules, and binaries are from
Never mind I found the solution to the problem:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-apache/2003/debian-apache-200312/msg00289.html
I just replaced the libapache-mod-perl with the sid [Unstable] package.
On 05/01/04 13:27 -0500, Theodore Knab wrote:
> There is a documented bug with the Testing (Sarge)
On 05 Jan 2004 20:13 CET you wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>
> Mine segfaults on cold-start but only with php4 module loaded and
> have done so for quite a while.
ii apache 1.3.29.0.1-3 Versatile, high-performance HTTP server
ii apache-common 1.3.29.0.1-3 Support files for all Apache web
Hi!
Mine segfaults on cold-start but only with php4 module loaded and
have done so for quite a while.
I figured out that, at least in my case, this works ...
I comment out the php4 module and 'apachectl start',
then uncomment it and 'apachectl restart' ...
All modules, and binaries are from
Never mind I found the solution to the problem:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-apache/2003/debian-apache-200312/msg00289.html
I just replaced the libapache-mod-perl with the sid [Unstable] package.
On 05/01/04 13:27 -0500, Theodore Knab wrote:
> There is a documented bug with the Testing (Sarge)
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 15:05, Thomas Lamy wrote:
> You're wrong. round robin dns isn't HA, isn't load balancing, it's just
> request spreading. You can't control how many (DNS-)clients cache one of the
> RR IP's, therefore you won't get even load on your RR'ed servers.
> Plus you _have_ to use a too
Thomas Lamy wrote:
Mathieu Martin wrote:
Mario Lopez wrote:
Why not using 'roundrobin' ???
Install a couple of Web-Servers, give each Server an IP and
then setup for each Server a A-Record on your DNS-Server
pointing to the same hostname.
The problem with round robin is th
Mathieu Martin wrote:
>
> Mario Lopez wrote:
>
> >>Why not using 'roundrobin' ???
> >>
> >>Install a couple of Web-Servers, give each Server an IP and
> >>then setup for each Server a A-Record on your DNS-Server
> >>pointing to the same hostname.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >The problem with round
Mario Lopez wrote:
Why not using 'roundrobin' ???
Install a couple of Web-Servers, give each Server an IP and
then setup for each Server a A-Record on your DNS-Server
pointing to the same hostname.
The problem with round robin is that when one server fails over it keeps sending them co
>Why not using 'roundrobin' ???
>
>Install a couple of Web-Servers, give each Server an IP and
>then setup for each Server a A-Record on your DNS-Server
>pointing to the same hostname.
The problem with round robin is that when one server fails over it keeps sending them
connections, I once sa
Michelle Konzack wrote:
>
> Am 2003-09-17 01:49:31, schrieb Shri Shrikumar:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I am looking to implement an Apache cluster with Load Balancing and
> >failover and after going through several options, the only
> one that is
> >not too complex and does everything that I need seems to be
Am 2003-09-17 01:49:31, schrieb Shri Shrikumar:
>Hi,
>
>I am looking to implement an Apache cluster with Load Balancing and
>failover and after going through several options, the only one that is
>not too complex and does everything that I need seems to be pen
Why not using 'roundrobin' ???
Insta
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 19:58, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> Well there's the confusing part. You had said:
>
> I even use it on Netfilter firewalls without any trouble (without
> the LVS support).
>
> It's the 'without the LVS support' that caught my eye.
Yes, you can use keepalive without LVS (j
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 06:46:13PM +0200, Markus Oswald wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 16:41, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 06:38:44PM +0200, S?bastien Lefebvre wrote:
> > > >
> > > You might want to use keepalived which includes a vrrp
> > > implementation. I'm running it on t
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 16:41, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 06:38:44PM +0200, S?bastien Lefebvre wrote:
> > >
> > You might want to use keepalived which includes a vrrp
> > implementation. I'm running it on the clusters I set up :
> > http://keepalived.sourceforge.net/ I even use
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 06:38:44PM +0200, S?bastien Lefebvre wrote:
> >
> You might want to use keepalived which includes a vrrp
> implementation. I'm running it on the clusters I set up :
> http://keepalived.sourceforge.net/ I even use it on Netfilter
> firewalls without any trouble (without the
Has anybody played with vrrpd for creating a failover pair?
I have a quite a low load, but would like to be able to handle a failure
cleanly, so a pair of machines would do fine. The only other issue I have
is a lack of external IP space, can you get vrrpd to do it's keep alive
thing via a subi
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 17:44, Jason Lim wrote:
> Strangely enough, you might find FreeBSD (or one of the BSDs) working
> better as the forwarded than Linux, due to it's better ability to handle
> many multiple concurrent connections. YMMV of course.
Is the balancer-functionality build into the Fre
>
> No, I don't think this would work. You'll need a third box which will do
> the balancing (well, maybe you could get it to work but it's not
> intended this way).
>
> As I said before, the balancer doesn't have to be a fast machine -
> almost anything you can find will be sufficient.
>
Strange
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 04:46:45PM +0200, Markus Oswald wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 20:52, Shri Shrikumar wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the response. Let me just clarify. If I have two boxes, I can
> > configure both of them to be webservers and one of them to be the lvs
> > node. I dont need a third
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 20:52, Shri Shrikumar wrote:
> Thanks for the response. Let me just clarify. If I have two boxes, I can
> configure both of them to be webservers and one of them to be the lvs
> node. I dont need a third machine to be a dedicated node. Is this
> correct ?
No, I don't think t
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 02:00:35PM +0100, Shri Shrikumar wrote:
> Looking at the documentation for LVS, it mentions that it needs two
> nodes, a primary node and a backup node which then feeds into n real
> servers.
>
We're using a single LVS server to balance things out to 4 webserver, 2
POP ma
Shri Shrikumar wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 18:46, Markus Oswald wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 15:00, Shri Shrikumar wrote:
> >
> > > Looking at the documentation for LVS, it mentions that it
> needs two
> > > nodes, a primary node and a backup node which then feeds
> into n real
> > > serv
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 18:46, Markus Oswald wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 15:00, Shri Shrikumar wrote:
>
> > Looking at the documentation for LVS, it mentions that it needs two
> > nodes, a primary node and a backup node which then feeds into n real
> > servers.
>
> Actually I never saw this men
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 12:05, Joost Veldkamp wrote:
> You can also have a look at www.ultramonkey.org , deb packages
> avaialble. Simplifies the installation of LVS a lot.
> Recently, there was a article in Sysadmin mag. about clustering. There
> was an interesting part about openSSI, it can be fou
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 15:00, Shri Shrikumar wrote:
> Looking at the documentation for LVS, it mentions that it needs two
> nodes, a primary node and a backup node which then feeds into n real
> servers.
Actually I never saw this mentioned in the documentation - I haven't
looked at it for quite s
Shri Shrikumar wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 08:50, Markus Oswald wrote:
> > Personally I would suggest LVS / keepalived - IMHO it's the
> most robust
> > and powerful solution you can currently get. Definitely
> worth a look...
> >
> > It's not as hard to setup as you think - you need a lit
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 08:50, Markus Oswald wrote:
> Personally I would suggest LVS / keepalived - IMHO it's the most robust
> and powerful solution you can currently get. Definitely worth a look...
>
> It's not as hard to setup as you think - you need a little bit of
> experience for planing your
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 12:07, Javier Castillo Alcibar wrote:
> By the way, what filysystem do you recomend for these kind of
> clusters?? NFS?? Coda??
Depends on what you want to do - for instance:
Build a balanced server farm to handle a lot of traffic:
Just use a NFS server as centralized storag
By the way, what filysystem do you recomend for these kind of clusters?? NFS?? Coda??
-Mensaje original-
De: Joost Veldkamp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: miércoles, 17 de septiembre de 2003 12:05
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: Re: Apache clustering w/ load balancing and
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 09:50, Markus Oswald wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 02:49, Shri Shrikumar wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am looking to implement an Apache cluster with Load Balancing and
> > failover and after going through several options, the only one that is
> > not too complex and does everyth
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 02:49, Shri Shrikumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking to implement an Apache cluster with Load Balancing and
> failover and after going through several options, the only one that is
> not too complex and does everything that I need seems to be pen
>
> http://siag.nu/pen/
>
>
Dear Thomas and Alejandro,
I don't have the php4-imap instaled in my debian.
More one information for all: I use debian 3.0 on a SPARC Station (SUN Netra I).
No more,
Thanks,
Rafael Domingues Pires.
Ourinhos - Brasil
Citando Alejandro Vartabedian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> yes, efectively the imap
El vie, 15-08-2003 a las 07:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
> Dear,
>
> I have a problem.
> I have instaled apache and php4 with apt-get, but when i don't comment the line:
> LoadModule php4_module /usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_php4.so
> apache don't start.
> Help-me
Help me help you.
Whats the error
yes, efectively the imap.so have problems.
i have php4-imap 4.2.3-14 on woody and the problem is here.
its not the correct way, but i fixed it replacing the extension with an
rpm extracted one.
if you think it is of utility here is de link to the original package:
http://rpms.arvin.dk/php/rh72/i
Depends on which php version and php4 modules you have installed. There was
an upload of a more recent php version + modules on wednesday or thursday,
so it's not made it's way into testing...
The php4-imap module (4:4.1.2) is known to cause such problems; remove it if
u don't need it.
--
Thomas
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 10:17:40AM -0700, Wade Richards wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 13:00:33 +0300, Sami Haahtinen writes:
> >awstats
> > It does the best job of these three, it collects just about every bit
> > of data that i can think of (and more) but the way it's packaged makes
> > it unusa
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:04:19PM +0200, Marcin Sochacki wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 08:33:53AM -0500, Steve Suehring wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 01:00:33PM +0300, Sami Haahtinen wrote:
> > > analog
> > > The only one that doesn't have packaging or application bugs, but then
> > >
On Monday 04 August 2003 12:00, Sami Haahtinen wrote:
> webalizer
> It works, but somehow it appears to ignore my ignore clauses and fails
> to properly create indexes (this might be due to me, or something
> else)
I had problems with Ignore statemtns if there's already an incremental
datab
1 - 100 of 453 matches
Mail list logo
