On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 04:46:45PM +0200, Markus Oswald wrote: > On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 20:52, Shri Shrikumar wrote: > > > Thanks for the response. Let me just clarify. If I have two boxes, I can > > configure both of them to be webservers and one of them to be the lvs > > node. I dont need a third machine to be a dedicated node. Is this > > correct ? > > No, I don't think this would work. You'll need a third box which will do > the balancing (well, maybe you could get it to work but it's not > intended this way). > > As I said before, the balancer doesn't have to be a fast machine - > almost anything you can find will be sufficient.
Has anybody played with vrrpd for creating a failover pair? I have a quite a low load, but would like to be able to handle a failure cleanly, so a pair of machines would do fine. The only other issue I have is a lack of external IP space, can you get vrrpd to do it's keep alive thing via a subinterface on a seperate ip range? McC -simonm (E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: +44 28 9072 5060 M: +44 7710 836915) One line sigs are cool. This isn't one of them. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
