Folks,
I handle tech for small ISP that has < 5000 users.
We are about to do a big marketing push for new users (all those
getting PCs over holidays).
Users will get email and hard disk space. 1GB limit
Wondering if any of you have any metrics on what gets typically used.
Up to now we have never
On Tuesday 07 September 2004 16:40, Maykel Moya wrote:
> Those of you who run large imap/pop boxes with either Cyrus or Courier
> could send me your hardware configuration?
>
> Thanks in advance
> mike
There is a list of installations on the cyrus wiki page which you might fin
> Maykel Moya a écrit :
> > Those of you who run large imap/pop boxes with either Cyrus or Courier
> > could send me your hardware configuration?
>
> If it is not already planned, could you please send a summary of
> the answers on the list? It could be interesting for man
Hello,
Maykel Moya a écrit :
Those of you who run large imap/pop boxes with either Cyrus or Courier
could send me your hardware configuration?
If it is not already planned, could you please send a summary of
the answers on the list? It could be interesting for many of us.
Cheers,
--
Emmanuel
Those of you who run large imap/pop boxes with either Cyrus or Courier
could send me your hardware configuration?
Thanks in advance
mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 20:05, Brett Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (create large file)
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dd if=/dev/urandom of=public_html/large_file bs=1024
> > count=5 5+0 records in
> > 5+0 records out
> >
> > (get large file)
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ wget www.lobefin.net/
m David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
in 1997. At the time Dave used that as his standard .sig because it was
really ground-breaking performance from Linux of >11MB/s TCP!
When I did tests I never got 11MB/s on my machines, that is because my
hardware was probably not as good, and bec
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 10:49:26PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Michelle Konzack said:
> > Am 2004-07-19 10:01:06, schrieb Russell Coker:
> > >On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 05:59, Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> >Thinking of the expected 50KB/sec download rate
This one time, at band camp, Michelle Konzack said:
> Am 2004-07-19 10:01:06, schrieb Russell Coker:
> >On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 05:59, Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >Thinking of the expected 50KB/sec download rate i calculated a
> >> >theoretical maximum of ~250 simultaneous download
Am 2004-07-19 10:01:06, schrieb Russell Coker:
>On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 05:59, Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >Thinking of the expected 50KB/sec download rate i calculated a
>> >theoretical maximum of ~250 simultaneous downloads -- am i right ?
>>
>> With a 100 MBit NIC you can have a m
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 05:59, Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Thinking of the expected 50KB/sec download rate i calculated a
> >theoretical maximum of ~250 simultaneous downloads -- am i right ?
>
> With a 100 MBit NIC you can have a maximum of 7 MByte/sec
What makes you think so?
Oth
Am 2004-07-18 13:37:03, schrieb Henrik Heil:
>However the 50/150 concurrent requests are a guess (best i can get for now)
>What do you think is the request-limit with a
>Pentium IV 2 GHz, 1GB RAM, 100Mbit, IDE-disk ?
>
>Thinking of the expected 50KB/sec download rate i calculated a
>theoretical m
Henrik Heil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However the 50/150 concurrent requests are a guess (best i can get for now)
> What do you think is the request-limit with a
> Pentium IV 2 GHz, 1GB RAM, 100Mbit, IDE-disk ?
Since all your files could be cached into the RAM, with a fast webserver
like thttp
Thanks for your advice -- seems i have been too chicken-hearted.
Summary: Don't bother with tuning the server and don't even think about
setting up a cluster for something like this - definitely overkill. ;o)
That's what i'll do ;-)
However the 50/150 concurrent requests are a guess (best i can get
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 14:09, Nate Duehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Other good ways to do this include a shared RAID'ed network filesystem
> on a central box and two front-end boxes that are load-balanced with a
> hardware load-balancer. That gets into the "must be up 24/7
uying
the IDENTICAL hardware for the standby machine and then scramble to
reconfigure or fight with other hardware issues when they swing to the
machine manually.
Other good ways to do this include a shared RAID'ed network filesystem
on a central box and two front-end boxes that are load-
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 10:39, Nate Duehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 16, 2004, at 1:43 PM, Markus Oswald wrote:
> > Summary: Don't bother with tuning the server and don't even think about
> > setting up a cluster for something like this - definitely overkill. ;o)
>
> Unless there's a business
On Jul 16, 2004, at 1:43 PM, Markus Oswald wrote:
Summary: Don't bother with tuning the server and don't even think about
setting up a cluster for something like this - definitely overkill. ;o)
Unless there's a business requirement that it be available 24/7 with no
maintenance downtime - that adds
able to spit out at least
> 5MB/s. You should also make sure you have plenty of RAM (at least 512MB) to
> make sure you can cache as much of the files in RAM as possible.
As long as we are not talking about 486 class hardware then disks can handle
>5MB/s. In 1998 I bought the cheapest ava
have cable modems and their download
> speed should not drop below 50KB/sec.
>
> My questions are:
> What would be an adequate hardware to handle i.e. 50(average)/150(peak)
> concurrent downloads?
> What is the typical bottleneck in this setup?
> What optimizations shou
he users will have cable modems and their download
> speed should not drop below 50KB/sec.
>
> My questions are:
> What would be an adequate hardware to handle i.e. 50(average)/150(peak)
> concurrent downloads?
> What is the typical bottleneck in this setup?
> What optimization
questions are:
What would be an adequate hardware to handle i.e. 50(average)/150(peak)
concurrent downloads?
What is the typical bottleneck in this setup?
What optimizations should i apply to a standard woody or sarge
installation? (anything kernelwise?)
I have experiences with not so specialized
I currently have 2 compaq systems:
1 running rhel3
hp proliant ml350
and the other debian3.0r2.
proliant ml 330.
I have been unable to find a consistent listing of where I can get the
software to do, disk and various hardware monitoring on the system.
I am planning to purchase a rackmount
I currently have 2 compaq systems:
1 running rhel3
hp proliant ml350
and the other debian3.0r2.
proliant ml 330.
I have been unable to find a consistent listing of where I can get the
software to do, disk and various hardware monitoring on the system.
I am planning to purchase a rackmount
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 11:01:22PM +0100, Joaquin Ferrero wrote:
> Hi.
>
> A customer will need to burn 50Gb daily to DVDs (satellite imaginery
> products). All discs have different contents.
>
> We need a juke box with space to store virgin disk and burned disk...
> many discs... for automatic w
Hi.
A customer will need to burn 50Gb daily to DVDs (satellite imaginery
products). All discs have different contents.
We need a juke box with space to store virgin disk and burned disk...
many discs... for automatic writing.
I looked to:
http://www.daxarchiving.com/
but i need more options...
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 11:01:22PM +0100, Joaquin Ferrero wrote:
> Hi.
>
> A customer will need to burn 50Gb daily to DVDs (satellite imaginery
> products). All discs have different contents.
>
> We need a juke box with space to store virgin disk and burned disk...
> many discs... for automatic w
Hi.
A customer will need to burn 50Gb daily to DVDs (satellite imaginery
products). All discs have different contents.
We need a juke box with space to store virgin disk and burned disk...
many discs... for automatic writing.
I looked to:
http://www.daxarchiving.com/
but i need more options...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cool, I know the answer to that one.
You can use DMO (http://sourceforge.net/projects/dmo)
The sourceforge link is the frontend to the database. Its still lacking
some scripts
but in general, it uses nmap, nessus etc. to discover as much as
possible f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cool, I know the answer to that one.
You can use DMO (http://sourceforge.net/projects/dmo)
The sourceforge link is the frontend to the database. Its still lacking
some scripts
but in general, it uses nmap, nessus etc. to discover as much as
possible f
e
> no idea what's in them. As an ISP with several hundred machines, it's
> become quite the challenge to remember all of the hardware.
>
> Has anyone made/found/dreamed of a script that can be run on each machine
> to keep track of the hardware in that machine. I'm
e
> no idea what's in them. As an ISP with several hundred machines, it's
> become quite the challenge to remember all of the hardware.
>
> Has anyone made/found/dreamed of a script that can be run on each machine
> to keep track of the hardware in that machine. I'm
ools: http://linas.org/linux/cmvc.html
other... http://cbbrowne.com/info/linuxsysconfig.html
I'd be interested in hearing of any other OSS solutions that have client
machines updating to/from a central database with their current hardware
and software configuration.
Cheers,
--
ools: http://linas.org/linux/cmvc.html
other... http://cbbrowne.com/info/linuxsysconfig.html
I'd be interested in hearing of any other OSS solutions that have client
machines updating to/from a central database with their current hardware
and software configuration.
Cheers,
--
Well it's finally hit the point where we have a few machines where we have
no idea what's in them. As an ISP with several hundred machines, it's
become quite the challenge to remember all of the hardware.
Has anyone made/found/dreamed of a script that can be run on each machine
t
Well it's finally hit the point where we have a few machines where we have
no idea what's in them. As an ISP with several hundred machines, it's
become quite the challenge to remember all of the hardware.
Has anyone made/found/dreamed of a script that can be run on each machine
t
ately
they are inacceptable due to the very slow speed and due to the way linux kernel
caches block devices' content (linux kernel will cache *encrypted* blocks, so
all operations that involve reading from in-memory cache will involve
decryption!).
So we are looking for a hardware-based
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 19:30:19 +0200, axacheng wrote:
>
> Hello List :
>
> We're 2 intel base testing servers need to stress/benchmark for hardware stability
> and reliability
>
> those are testing servers runing Debian woody...
As a stress test, I'd go for
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 03:50, Alex Borges wrote:
> Bonnie++For testing your disks/storage (you can BM a samba share if
> you want for example)
Particularly try the experimental version, it has some new features.
> slapper For testing your ldap
Never got time to implement that one...
>
farm is not big
enough. Get enough to make those servers cry.
El mar, 16-09-2003 a las 12:03, axacheng escribió:
> Hello List :
>
> We're 2 intel base testing servers need to stress/benchmark for hardware stability
> and reliability
>
> those are testing serv
Hello List :
We're 2 intel base testing servers need to stress/benchmark for hardware stability and
reliability
those are testing servers runing Debian woody...
Anyone has any good advice?
--
Trust & Unique ...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a s
Michelle Konzack wrote
> Am 23:32 2003-02-28 +0100 hat Christoph Loeffler geschrieben:
> >
> >Hello,
> >
> >i want to install debian to server with two IDE 80GB disks on a
> >Hardware RAID. The Controller is a Promise Fasttrak tx 2000.
>
> ??? Hardware Ra
Michelle Konzack wrote
> Am 23:32 2003-02-28 +0100 hat Christoph Loeffler geschrieben:
> >
> >Hello,
> >
> >i want to install debian to server with two IDE 80GB disks on a
> >Hardware RAID. The Controller is a Promise Fasttrak tx 2000.
>
> ??? Hardware Ra
Hi,
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 23:32 2003-02-28 +0100 hat Christoph Loeffler geschrieben:
i want to install debian to server with two IDE 80GB disks on a
Hardware RAID. The Controller is a Promise Fasttrak tx 2000.
??? Hardware Raid ???
This Controler is not a real Hardware RAID.
For that use a
Hi,
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 23:32 2003-02-28 +0100 hat Christoph Loeffler geschrieben:
i want to install debian to server with two IDE 80GB disks on a
Hardware RAID. The Controller is a Promise Fasttrak tx 2000.
??? Hardware Raid ???
This Controler is not a real Hardware RAID.
For that
Am 02:09 2003-03-01 +0100 hat Mark Schouten geschrieben:
>
>Hi,
>
>On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 11:32:50PM +0100, Christoph Loeffler wrote:
>Had this problem once. There are two options:
>
>1: You select an option in the kernelconfiguration, which says that you
>system should use offboard IDE-devices a
Hello ,
Am 23:32 2003-02-28 +0100 hat Christoph Loeffler geschrieben:
>
>Hello,
>
>i want to install debian to server with two IDE 80GB disks on a
>Hardware RAID. The Controller is a Promise Fasttrak tx 2000.
??? Hardware Raid ???
This Controler is not a real Hardware RAID.
F
Hello ,
Am 23:32 2003-02-28 +0100 hat Christoph Loeffler geschrieben:
>
>Hello,
>
>i want to install debian to server with two IDE 80GB disks on a
>Hardware RAID. The Controller is a Promise Fasttrak tx 2000.
??? Hardware Raid ???
This Controler is not a real Hardware RAID.
F
Am 02:09 2003-03-01 +0100 hat Mark Schouten geschrieben:
>
>Hi,
>
>On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 11:32:50PM +0100, Christoph Loeffler wrote:
>Had this problem once. There are two options:
>
>1: You select an option in the kernelconfiguration, which says that you
>system should use offboard IDE-devices a
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 11:32:50PM +0100, Christoph Loeffler wrote:
> i want to install debian to server with two IDE 80GB disks on a
> Hardware RAID. The Controller is a Promise Fasttrak tx 2000.
> The two disks are configured as RAID-1 (mirroring)
>
> It was not possible to
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 11:32:50PM +0100, Christoph Loeffler wrote:
> i want to install debian to server with two IDE 80GB disks on a
> Hardware RAID. The Controller is a Promise Fasttrak tx 2000.
> The two disks are configured as RAID-1 (mirroring)
>
> It was not possible to
Hello,
i want to install debian to server with two IDE 80GB disks on a
Hardware RAID. The Controller is a Promise Fasttrak tx 2000.
The two disks are configured as RAID-1 (mirroring)
It was not possible to install debian directly to the
disk, because the disks where not found.
At the point, when
Hello,
i want to install debian to server with two IDE 80GB disks on a
Hardware RAID. The Controller is a Promise Fasttrak tx 2000.
The two disks are configured as RAID-1 (mirroring)
It was not possible to install debian directly to the
disk, because the disks where not found.
At the point, when
Russell Coker wrote:
> > boot = /dev/hda, map = /boot/map.0301
> > Added Linux *
> > boot = /dev/hdc, map = /boot/map.1601
> > Added Linux *
>
> That looks like an old version of LILO. The latest LILO in Debian is
> 22.3.3 and doesn't work like that.
Yes, at home I have 22.3.3-2.
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003 14:15, Fraser Campbell wrote:
> > > the way I've tested it also works with
> > >
> > > install-mbr /dev/md1
> >
> > Why would you want to use install-mbr on a RAID device?
> >
> > I use install-mbr for the MBR on the hard drive (/dev/sda and /dev/sdb in
> > this case) and then h
Russell Coker wrote:
> > > raid-extra-boot="/dev/sda,/dev/sdb"
> > >
> > > According to the documentation of lilo, this shouldn't be necessary,
> > > but apparently either the funcionality or the docs are buggy. Without
> > > that line I couldn't boot at all from the second disk,
> >
> > the way I
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 01:25, Andraz Sraka wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 14:42, Pierfrancesco Caci wrote:
> > Instead of install-mbr, I used the following line in lilo.conf:
> >
> > raid-extra-boot="/dev/sda,/dev/sdb"
> >
> > According to the documentation of lilo, this shouldn't be necessary,
> > bu
re
On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 14:42, Pierfrancesco Caci wrote:
> Instead of install-mbr, I used the following line in lilo.conf:
>
> raid-extra-boot="/dev/sda,/dev/sdb"
>
> According to the documentation of lilo, this shouldn't be necessary,
> but apparently either the funcionality or the docs are b
:-> "Russell" == Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi
> I've written a document on using Linux software RAID with hot-swap SCSI
> hardware.
nice doc, just a little comment about booting:
> *Booting*
> To make a RAID-1 device boo
I've written a document on using Linux software RAID with hot-swap SCSI
hardware.
It's slightly specific to the hardware I use (I wrote it for internal use) but
can easily be adapted to be more generic.
If someone wants to add it to a HOWTO or something then be my guest, pleas
>If what you require is only a small drive, and you don't have too much
>I/O on it (basically serving webpages is OK, SQL is not), did you
>consider using CF cards ?
I have no experience with compactflasch and my local dealers
can not give me informations about it...
Suggestins ?
>If what you require is only a small drive, and you don't have too much
>I/O on it (basically serving webpages is OK, SQL is not), did you
>consider using CF cards ?
I have no experience with compactflasch and my local dealers
can not give me informations about it...
Suggestins ?
also sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.05.1114 +0100]:
> Have fun with it, if a harddisk fails ( on most controllers ) your
> system will hang and it doesn't boot anymore. So good luck with your
> IBM controllers. If i would buy a controller it would be an Adaptec
> due to my go
> On Wed, 04 Dec 2002 11:31:00 +, Michelle Konzack
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >A two chanel RAID-1 Controller for two Harddisks for 480 US$ ;-))
>
> They come with a price.
>
> If you're looking for something cheaper, I'd say goodbye to my
> requirements and get some el cheapo promise car
On Wed, 04 Dec 2002 11:31:00 +, Michelle Konzack
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>A two chanel RAID-1 Controller for two Harddisks for 480 US$ ;-))
They come with a price.
If you're looking for something cheaper, I'd say goodbye to my
requirements and get some el cheapo promise cards or do softwar
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:25:55AM +, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> >
> >On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 02:22:43AM +, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>
> >RAID-1 is mirroring. You plan 4- or 8-way mirroring ??
>
> what do you mean with '4- or 8-way' ?
>
You said in
ne original and one mirror)
Had problems with Software RAID, because the mirror is not
bootable and after a shutdown thy Server was not starting.
I think, I can use only Hardware RAID.
>3ware. Definetly. Although I'm not sure that it supports RAID-1 arrays
I have not found a rese
Hello Steven,
Am 10:09 2002-12-03 +1300 hat Jones, Steven geschrieben:
>
>lol,
>
>all over the place does not incl NZ.
>
>Choice is very limited here in NZ, Id like a 3ware but its try and get
>someone in the US to sell & send it to me at a sane price (international
>shipping hence no warrantee) o
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 08:53, Nicolas Bougues wrote:
> > curently I am installing some new Servers and I need Hardware
> > RAID-1 Controllers for two, four and eight Harddisks.
>
> RAID-1 is mirroring. You plan 4- or 8-way mirroring ??
RAID-1 on 2X disks (where X>1) == RAID-10
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 10:09:00 +1300 , "Jones, Steven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>all over the place does not incl NZ.
Michelle claims to be only able to order in Germany. I am in Germany
too. Hence I named products readily available in Germany.
In fact, Michelle ist known pretty well on the german
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 02:22:43AM +, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello,
>
> curently I am installing some new Servers and I need Hardware
> RAID-1 Controllers for two, four and eight Harddisks.
>
RAID-1 is mirroring. You plan 4- or 8-way mirroring ??
Or you'd like to
ware unit is looking $1400AU+ like
$700US+then i have to pay Customs off so another 12.5%, way too much.
regards
Thing
-Original Message-
From: Marc Haber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 3 December 2002 9:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Hardware IDE RAID-1 contro
On Mon, 02 Dec 2002 02:22:43 +, Michelle Konzack
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>curently I am installing some new Servers and I need Hardware
>RAID-1 Controllers for two, four and eight Harddisks.
3ware, available all over the place.
>Ic possibel with HOTSWAP.
Infortrend,
Hello,
curently I am installing some new Servers and I need Hardware
RAID-1 Controllers for two, four and eight Harddisks.
Can anyone recomand some ?
Ic possibel with HOTSWAP.
Please note, that I have only acces to german distributors.
Is there a RAID-1 Controller which support PIO Mode 4
We use APC Powerswitch here. They're not badly priced and give you a
telnet/http controllable 8 port powerbar.
--
Ian Cass
- Original Message -
From: "John Ackermann N8UR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:26 PM
Subject: network watchdog hard
I'm using a "business class" cable modem setup with Roadrunner. Actually,
it works pretty well and the reliability is OK. However, when it goes
down, the tech support line's first answer is always to reset the router (a
Cisco br905). Amazingly and annoyingly enough, that usually works. The
> > There is no performance-hit with UDMA100/133 drives when using two
> > devices per channel. This an old "SCSI-is-best" story that were true a
> > long time ago.
>
> On http://www.coker.com.au/hardware/46g.png I have a graph of this using
> ATA66 on an A
urces to handle it, so dont plan on a too small one.
So, at the end, a standard Off the market PC should be ok as the actual
configs are quite impressive now.
Hope that help,
Cheers,
JeF
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 10:48:46AM +0100, Anders Gjære wrote:
> what hardware is nessesary to run a bgp/ze
what hardware is nessesary to run a bgp/zebra router on i386-platform,
routing a 100mbit line?
mvh
anders gjære
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
good at
anything ;-) Performance is lackluster, and reliability... well, lets put
it this way: there are IDE RAID cards here with Highpoint chips for US$25
with change ;-)
>
> > I think (hopefully) that a Hardware IDE Raid card should solve this
> > problem. I am in the process of buying a
good at
anything ;-) Performance is lackluster, and reliability... well, lets put
it this way: there are IDE RAID cards here with Highpoint chips for US$25
with change ;-)
>
> > I think (hopefully) that a Hardware IDE Raid card should solve this
> > problem. I am in the process of buying a
. This
allows them to deal with that problem at boot time, and then the kernel does
software RAID with the same mapping once it's loaded.
> I think (hopefully) that a Hardware IDE Raid card should solve this
> problem. I am in the process of buying a couple of 3ware cards right now
> (es
ds might work better, but I tested with an Asus and
Magic-Pro motherboard, and had the same thing happen.
I think (hopefully) that a Hardware IDE Raid card should solve this
problem. I am in the process of buying a couple of 3ware cards right now
(especially after Promise said outright that they do n
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002 10:22, Jose Alberto Guzman wrote:
> >Who recommends that you don't use software RAID on the root file system?
> >
> >Not me (lilo maintainer and user of this), not the lilo author, not the
> >software RAID kernel maintainer.
>
> Sorry, I'm not up to date on the newest features
loader don't allow booting
>from the second disk then you just have to physically swap disks (which is
>much less effort than swapping disks and restoring from backup).
>
>> You can't be 24x7-high-availability with software raid only, there's
>>always some down time involved with it, or at least a higher risk of
>>downtime than with hardware raid.
>>
>
>Actually LinuxBIOS could solve this issue...
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#x27;t allow booting
from the second disk then you just have to physically swap disks (which is
much less effort than swapping disks and restoring from backup).
> You can't be 24x7-high-availability with software raid only, there's
> always some down time involved with i
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Jason Lim wrote:
> > Depending on your syslog configuration, it whines that you should
> change the
> > faulty drive with a good one until you do.
>
> Thats want I want then... ;-)
[..and from 'closest to debian']
>>Unfortunately, if this happens at 3am in the morning, no
one? so that lilo boots... ??
>
Yeap... if you plug the faulty drive into hdc (you know what i mean) and
the working into hda, then it boots.
> > My question: if this was hardware RAID 1... would this have happened?
> > Would the hardware RAID controller recognise the problem, an
x7-high-availability with software raid only, there's always
some down time involved with it, or at least a higher risk of downtime than
with hardware raid.
> If the bad drive is put in by itself, after a while the disk is
> failed and it tries to boot by floppy.
Does Lilo
> > My question: if this was hardware RAID 1... would this have
> > happened? Would the hardware RAID controller recognise the
> > problem, and only stop briefly, then try the second disk
> > automatically and transparently?
>
> I believe hardware RAID would
Sincerely,
- Original Message -
From: "Russell Coker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 2:26 PM
Subject: Re: Software VS Hardware Raid
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 13:01, Ja
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 13:01, Jason Lim wrote:
> Case 1)
> I replaced one of the disks with an old disk with bad blocks and strange
[...]
> My question: if this was hardware RAID 1... would this have happened?
> Would the hardware RAID controller recognise the problem, and only stop
>
2 disks are not on the same
cable btw. The BIOS had the usual settings allowing me to set the boot
order (Floppy first, CDrom next, hard disk 0, then network (no, i can't
put hard disk 1, I wish i could), and finally had "Boot other devices" set
to yes.
My question: if this was hard
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Kaplan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 3:20 PM
> To: Debian-Isp
> Subject: hardware raid
>
>
> I'm looking for a good hardware raid 1 (mirroring) solution
> for Debian. Will
> the promise c
The 3ware cards work really well. www.3ware.com and check out the Escalade
6200/6400? or 7xxx series if you have 64-bit PCI slots.
- jsw
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Kaplan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 5:20 PM
To: Debian-Isp
Subject: hardware raid
I&#
I'm looking for a good hardware raid 1 (mirroring) solution for Debian. Will
the promise cards work with Debian or is there a better solution thanks.
Andrew P. Kaplan
Network Administrator
CyberShore, Inc.
http://www.cshore.com
"I couldn't give him advice in business and he c
Allen,
I don't know if you're aware but your mailer seems to have a Y2K
problem.
>From your mail header:
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 101 10:04:43 -0400 (EDT)
Gotta' be perl! :-)
Pete
--
http://www.elbnet.com
ELB Internet Services, Inc.
Web Design, Computer Consulting, Internet Hosting
--
To UNSU
anyone have recommendation for these specifications:
motherboard that fits in 1u case
onboard lan and video
no scsi
dual cpu
upto 1Ghz cpu
price range:
$180 and under
I want to put a acceleraid on it on the pci slot
so don't need the onboard scsi like the s2510u3ng from Tyan
trying to save some
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 04:25:13PM +0200, bibi wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I have plan to change some of the hardware in one of my server: new
> motherboard and new processors
>
> My question is : do I have to take care of the kernel or something else
> ?
> I m a little bi
Hi there,
I have plan to change some of the hardware in one of my server: new
motherboard and new processors
My question is : do I have to take care of the kernel or something else
?
I m a little bit worried about changing hardware. I dont know if I will
be able to reboot correctly after the
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
