Hi all,
In running up a new DSL connection today, I came across an "interesting"
situation w.r.t. DHCP and point-to-point links.
The planned implementation is to have the Netgear DG632 ADSL modem do
the PPPoA but pass (by DHCP) the single fixed-IP address to the Linux
box on the ethe
H. S. wrote:
Apparently, _Christopher J. Noyes_, on 03/19/04 00:00,typed:
I have DSL with verizon.com. It uses a Westel Wirespeed external modem
connected to a network card though ethernet. Does anyone know how
configure this on debian?
Christopher J. Noyes
(maybe this explains why you are
Paul Johnson wrote:
"Christopher J. Noyes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I have DSL with verizon.com. It uses a Westel Wirespeed external modem
connected to a network card though ethernet. Does anyone know how configure
this on debian?
If you're lucky, and they're not u
H. S. wrote:
Apparently, _Christopher J. Noyes_, on 03/19/04 00:00,typed:
I have DSL with verizon.com. It uses a Westel Wirespeed external modem
connected to a network card though ethernet. Does anyone know how
configure this on debian?
Christopher J. Noyes
(maybe this explains why you are
Paul Johnson wrote:
"Christopher J. Noyes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I have DSL with verizon.com. It uses a Westel Wirespeed external modem
connected to a network card though ethernet. Does anyone know how configure
this on debian?
If you're lucky, and they're not u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
"Christopher J. Noyes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have DSL with verizon.com. It uses a Westel Wirespeed external modem
> connected to a network card though ethernet. Does anyone know how configure
> this on debian?
If
I have DSL with verizon.com. It uses a Westel Wirespeed
external modem connected to a network card though ethernet. Does anyone know how
configure this on debian?
Christopher J. Noyes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
"Christopher J. Noyes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have DSL with verizon.com. It uses a Westel Wirespeed external modem
> connected to a network card though ethernet. Does anyone know how configure
> this on debian?
If
I have DSL with verizon.com. It uses a Westel Wirespeed
external modem connected to a network card though ethernet. Does anyone know how
configure this on debian?
Christopher J. Noyes
have a biger problem:
I have bought in Summer 2000 four 3Com DSL-Router 812 (server/
client) and ten DSL-Router 612 (client = modem/router).
Unfortunately has 3Com stoped the Production for the 812 and in
the Internet I have found nothing.
I need additional DSL-Router which can work in Server
have a biger problem:
I have bought in Summer 2000 four 3Com DSL-Router 812 (server/
client) and ten DSL-Router 612 (client = modem/router).
Unfortunately has 3Com stoped the Production for the 812 and in
the Internet I have found nothing.
I need additional DSL-Router which can work in Server
Dear ISP Group:
I am trying to configure my Debian machine to
communicate with my ISP via a Netopia DSL router
and a static IP address. The relevant documentation
I have seen applies to Redhat systems which have
a much different configuration file structure.
Does anybody know of documentation
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 11:52, luca cecchi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> anyone had configure a dsl connection with woody linux box and zyxel 642m
> (ethernet-modem
Hmmm. Which one is the 642M? How does it compare to 642ME which I could
set up without problems.
> I need configurat
Hi all,
anyone had configure a dsl connection with woody linux box and zyxel 642m
(ethernet-modem)?
I need configuration help.
Many Thanks.
Luca Cecchi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Matias,
> ( If I understand you, you are not using pppoe, you are trying to route the
> packets, is it ok? ).
>
Yes.
> You should have a rule in the output chain that ACCEPT packets to the
> destination ( 0.0.0.0 or what you want ) for the interface eth0.
> In your output chain you only accept
Hi Markus,
The packets go trought eth0 interface, You show it in the other email.
>route
>Kernel IP Routentabelle
>ZielRouter Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
>192.168.1.254 * 255.255.255.255 UH0 00 eth0
>192.168.2.0 *
Hi Markus,
The packets go trought eth0 interface, You show it in the other email.
>route
>Kernel IP Routentabelle
>ZielRouter Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
>192.168.1.254 * 255.255.255.255 UH0 00 eth0
>192.168.2.0 *
> I think that your problem is that you have some filter in your output chain
> of you firewall configuration.
> If you use iptable, you can view the filter with the command "iptables -L
> OUTPUT -n -v"
This is the output - seems to be completely open:
iptables -L OUTPUT -n -v
Chain OUTPUT (polic
> I think that your problem is that you have some filter in your output chain
> of you firewall configuration.
> If you use iptable, you can view the filter with the command "iptables -L
> OUTPUT -n -v"
This is the output - seems to be completely open:
iptables -L OUTPUT -n -v
Chain OUTPUT (polic
'm not on this list, so please cc me if you think you know what my
> problem is.
>
> I have a dlink DI-804 switch/DSL-Router and want to use it without it's
> integrated DHCP funktionality.
>
> So i disabled DHCP.
>
> I can ping it, use it's web-interface t
> 192.168.1.0 is my net.
> Starting IP Address : 192.168.0.100
Should this be the same?
(Or show us your ifconfig.)
Jeremy C. Reed
...
BSD software, documentation, resources, news...
http://bsd.reedmedia.net/
> > 192.168.1.0 is my net.
> >
> > Starting IP Address : 192.168.0.100
>
> Should this be the same?
>
> (Or show us your ifconfig.)
>
Ah, this is a relict from the original address of the router - it was
192.168.0.1. But this should not be a problem - DHCP is disabled, so the
range is not a param
BTW, i have the impression that the problem is related to routing in itself.
If i use, just like now, the DSL-Modem direct and bring up a ppp connection
like this...
ppp0 Protokoll:Punkt-zu-Punkt Verbindung
inet Adresse:212.144.221.8 P-z-P:145.253.1.223
Maske:255.255.255.255
'm not on this list, so please cc me if you think you know what my
> problem is.
>
> I have a dlink DI-804 switch/DSL-Router and want to use it without it's
> integrated DHCP funktionality.
>
> So i disabled DHCP.
>
> I can ping it, use it's web-interface t
BTW, i have the impression that the problem is related to routing in itself.
If i use, just like now, the DSL-Modem direct and bring up a ppp connection
like this...
ppp0 Protokoll:Punkt-zu-Punkt Verbindung
inet Adresse:212.144.221.8 P-z-P:145.253.1.223
Maske:255.255.255.255
Hello,
first, i'm not on this list, so please cc me if you think you know what my
problem is.
I have a dlink DI-804 switch/DSL-Router and want to use it without it's
integrated DHCP funktionality.
So i disabled DHCP.
I can ping it, use it's web-interface to configure it or d
> > 192.168.1.0 is my net.
> >
> > Starting IP Address : 192.168.0.100
>
> Should this be the same?
>
> (Or show us your ifconfig.)
>
Ah, this is a relict from the original address of the router - it was
192.168.0.1. But this should not be a problem - DHCP is disabled, so the
range is not a param
> 192.168.1.0 is my net.
> Starting IP Address : 192.168.0.100
Should this be the same?
(Or show us your ifconfig.)
Jeremy C. Reed
...
BSD software, documentation, resources, news...
http://bsd.reedmedia.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
Hello,
first, i'm not on this list, so please cc me if you think you know what my
problem is.
I have a dlink DI-804 switch/DSL-Router and want to use it without it's
integrated DHCP funktionality.
So i disabled DHCP.
I can ping it, use it's web-interface to configure it or d
Hi,
I know my isp (bellsouth) change somethings when
they updated the email and servers. I need to know
how to configure my speed touch home dsl modem
using 2.2.19 kernel. I have the latest packages-
woody packages using 2.2 kernel. I was using dhcp on
a network. I need to connect and get back
Harald Stangl wrote:
>Hi all,
>i've got some strange problem with my internet connection via dsl:
>When I try to reach certain pages, I get a message in mozilla that tells me,
>that the connection was refused by the peer. This happens only when i try to
>reach some encr
> > i've got some strange problem with my internet connection via dsl:
> > When I try to reach certain pages, I get a message in mozilla that
> > tells me, that the connection was refused by the peer. This happens
> > only when i try to reach
nyway, this seems a bit off-topic, but just wanted to give out some
hints on how to maybe solve the problem.
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Harald Stangl wrote:
> Hi all,
> i've got some strange problem with my internet connection via dsl:
> When I try to reach certain pages, I get a message in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott Kveton) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Hello all,
>
> I'm working on a problem that seems like it should work and am looking for
> some help knocking out any obvious problems.
>
> We currently have several DSL lines that a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott Kveton) wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Hello all,
>
> I'm working on a problem that seems like it should work and am looking for
> some help knocking out any obvious problems.
>
> We currently have several DSL lines that a
Scott Kveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> These are the routes in the main table. Now, I have Squid bound to
> 63.229.140.41 and I want all traffic with that source to go out
> 63.229.140.46 using source routing. I would think I would do the following:
>
> ip ru add prio 4000 from 63.229.140.4
Scott Kveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> These are the routes in the main table. Now, I have Squid bound to
> 63.229.140.41 and I want all traffic with that source to go out
> 63.229.140.46 using source routing. I would think I would do the following:
>
> ip ru add prio 4000 from 63.229.140.
Hello all,
I'm working on a problem that seems like it should work and am looking for
some help knocking out any obvious problems.
We currently have several DSL lines that are used for crawling websites.
Bandwidth as it is is pretty cheap via DSL (we have 6 7Mbit lines for much
less th
Hello all,
I'm working on a problem that seems like it should work and am looking for
some help knocking out any obvious problems.
We currently have several DSL lines that are used for crawling websites.
Bandwidth as it is is pretty cheap via DSL (we have 6 7Mbit lines for much
less th
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 02:58:43PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:51:02AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> > I think there's a problem with this. Even if you get DSL from
> > different providers, chances are good that they're using the same
>
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:51:02AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> I think there's a problem with this. Even if you get DSL from
> different providers, chances are good that they're using the same
> copper and DSLAM. Hence the redundancy isn't ...
knew there ha
Andy Bastien wrote:
>
> Failing a hardware solution, it would be an easy matter to run a
> script on the Linux box that will probe the active line to see if it's
> up. If it's not, do the routing commands to route through the backup
> line.
Rather than let one connection lay idle why not load
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Nathan E Norman wrote:
| I think there's a problem with this. Even if you get DSL from
| different providers, chances are good that they're using the same
| copper and DSLAM. Hence the redundancy isn't ...
|
| Cheers,
Most of the failures we've see
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 10:11:06AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I have a client that wants a fast reliable connection into their
> office complex. I'm trying to sell him a T1, but he keeps looking at
> DSL rates, and wants that. I think I impressed on him
> question is: DSL router for 2 lines? Or is there a way to make a
Intel sells such thingies very cheaply.
And there are tons of other providers.
> Linux box talk DSL? How about BGP in DSL land?
Uhm? anyone can tell me what routing has to do with the technology you
send the data? I thi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 07:42:35AM -0800, Duane Powers wrote:
Is he going to be using static ip's?
Yup. It's for his business.
I don't know of any ISP that will perform the routing nescessary for this for DSL custom
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Andy Bastien wrote:
| Failing a hardware solution, it would be an easy matter to run a
| script on the Linux box that will probe the active line to see if it's
| up. If it's not, do the routing commands to route through the backup
| line.
Exactly, have multiple gateways usin
rote:
> Hi folks,
> I have a client that wants a fast reliable connection into their
> office complex. I'm trying to sell him a T1, but he keeps looking at
> DSL rates, and wants that. I think I impressed on him enough about the
> lack of reliability in DSL, so he asked if you co
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Jeremy Lunn wrote:
| On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 10:11:06AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| > lack of reliability in DSL, so he asked if you could get 2 DSL lines
| > and have one failover to the other. Huh... a client with a clue! My
|
| Well, it might be different ov
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 07:42:35AM -0800, Duane Powers wrote:
> Is he going to be using static ip's?
Yup. It's for his business.
> I don't know of any ISP that will perform the routing nescessary for
> this for DSL customers (not enough revenue.)
>
> If he i
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 10:11:06AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> lack of reliability in DSL, so he asked if you could get 2 DSL lines
> and have one failover to the other. Huh... a client with a clue! My
Well, it might be different overseas (mind you I know you can get lucky
at least
Hi folks,
I have a client that wants a fast reliable connection into their
office complex. I'm trying to sell him a T1, but he keeps looking at
DSL rates, and wants that. I think I impressed on him enough about the
lack of reliability in DSL, so he asked if you could get 2 DSL lines
and
Ciao,
Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 12:04:31PM +0200, Alfredo Solano Martinez wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> my ISP offers me the following two models of DSL routers:
>
> * http://www.efficient.com/products/routsoho.html (the 5060)
>
> * http://www.alcatel.com/telecom/asd/keytech/adsl
Greetings,
my ISP offers me the following two models of DSL routers:
* http://www.efficient.com/products/routsoho.html (the 5060)
* http://www.alcatel.com/telecom/asd/keytech/adsl/adsl/modem/pro.htm
Any idea of which one should I choose?
I would also appreciate any advise about Ethernet
54 matches
Mail list logo
