On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 10:52:51PM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > > The name is very questionable. Could you please replace it with
> > > "eo_XX" for now, and with "eo" if that ever becomes possible?
It looks like "eo" does work, what trouble do you
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 06:56:35AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > % "Esperanto"
> > lang_name
> > ""
> > lang_ab "" % "eo"
> > -lang_lib "" % "eo"
> > +lang_lib "" % "epo"
>
>
> By the way, while writing a few new locales, I found it very hard
> because I followed the
> LC_NAME
> -% "%d%t%g%t%m%t%f"
> -name_fmt"/
> +% "%p%t%g%t%m%t%f"
> +name_fmt"/
> "
> name_mr "" % "s-ro"
> name_mrs"" % "s-ino"
> @@ -212,5 +212,5 @@
> % "Esperanto"
> lang_name
> ""
> lang_ab "" % "eo"
> -lang_lib "" % "eo"
> +lang_lib
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 10:52:51PM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> > Ok. BTW did you file a bugreport to upstream bugzilla?
>
> Er, no. What's the URL for that, please?
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla
You need an account, then file a bug against the localedata component.
You can brows
Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > The name is very questionable. Could you please replace it with
> > "eo_XX" for now, and with "eo" if that ever becomes possible?
>
> Makes sense, I'll do that in the belocs-locales-data package.
> Do you believe that an eo_EO alias should also be provided,
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 09:23:31AM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > - All patches are simply applied by you - I hope you review them.
> >For example, eo_EO is questionable with its entries.
>
> The name is very questionable. Could you please repla
GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> - All patches are simply applied by you - I hope you review them.
>For example, eo_EO is questionable with its entries.
The name is very questionable. Could you please replace it with
"eo_XX" for now, and with "eo" if that ever becomes possible?
As far a
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 06:56:37AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > + debian-locale-eu_FR
> > > Add new eu_FR locale.
> > > Patch by Christian Perrier.
> >
> > They're already under my review (sorry my lazyness, I'll work it).
>
> I don't understand. As far as I know, eu_FR i
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 10:54:35AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Mon, 25 Oct 2004 01:27:22 +0200,
> Denis Barbier wrote:
> > I am going to maintain my own version of locale files. This package is
> > called belocs-locales-data and available from
> > deb http://people.debian.org/~barbier/beloc
I have to admit that I'm a bit surprised by Denis proposal. I have the
feeling that some long-time conflicts are lying below this, but I'm
not sure that forking the locales package is the best way to solve
them.
Knowing Masanori Goto *and* Denis Barbier, I'm sure both of you guys
can work together
At Mon, 25 Oct 2004 01:27:22 +0200,
Denis Barbier wrote:
> I am going to maintain my own version of locale files. This package is
> called belocs-locales-data and available from
> deb http://people.debian.org/~barbier/belocs unstable main
> It is Arch: all and has no dependencies (except debconf
On Oct 25, Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My goal is to review all bugs sent to the BTS and upstream bugzilla,
> and apply requested changes in a timely manner if they look fine.
> And to demonstrate that there is no reason to have the locales package
> bound to libc6, having a separat
12 matches
Mail list logo
