On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 10:52:51PM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote: > Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > The name is very questionable. Could you please replace it with > > > "eo_XX" for now, and with "eo" if that ever becomes possible?
It looks like "eo" does work, what trouble do you have with it? > > Makes sense, I'll do that in the belocs-locales-data package. > > Do you believe that an eo_EO alias should also be provided, or do > > you want only one eo_* locale available? > > I think the eo_EO alias would be moderately useful. > > > In order for this locale to be available, it must be added to > > /usr/share/i18n/SUPPORTED. Are these entries correct? > > eo_XX UTF-8 > > eo_XX.ISO-8859-3 ISO-8859-3 > > Yes. UTF-8 is definitely more popular nowadays. The problem is that encoding of locales should never change in order to prevent compatibility problems. At the moment I added eo_XX.ISO-8859-3 and eo_XX.UTF-8 into belocs-locales-data, with aliases for eo_EO locales, but did not define eo_XX. Denis
