On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 10:54:35AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > At Mon, 25 Oct 2004 01:27:22 +0200, > Denis Barbier wrote: > > I am going to maintain my own version of locale files. This package is > > called belocs-locales-data and available from > > deb http://people.debian.org/~barbier/belocs unstable main > > It is Arch: all and has no dependencies (except debconf), and can then > > be installed on every system. > > My goal is to review all bugs sent to the BTS and upstream bugzilla, > > and apply requested changes in a timely manner if they look fine. > > And to demonstrate that there is no reason to have the locales package > > bound to libc6, having a separate source package drastically eases its > > maintenance. > > Here is the changelog entry. More to coom soon. > > My comments: > > - All patches are simply applied by you - I hope you review them.
Sure. For instance I dropped locale-de_CH.dpatch after reading #27397. > For example, eo_EO is questionable with its entries. > > - Note that I'm preparing glibc snapshot package for experimental > distro because sarge is not released yet. I'm spending to follow > debian specific patches to the latest cvs. It's nice to merge them > with your work. Any chance to see the locales package being a separate package? [...] > > + bts235759_transliterate_german_quotes > > In de_DE (resp. de_CH), transliterate <U201E> and <U201C> > > quotes to <U00BB> and <U00AB> (resp. <U00AB> and <U00BB>). > > I hope you re-read the entire thread. You should behave as maintainer > with regard to all opinions. Many people want this patch, and only one person is against it. > > + keep_sr_YU > > Keep sr_YU and [EMAIL PROTECTED] locales until transition to sr_CS is > > over. > > It'll be dropped after sarge. I want to provide a transition phase in which both exist, ie. I plan to drop them after etch. OTOH in current glibc CVS, sr_YU locales have been dropped before sr_CS get added. Denis