On Sun, 29 Jun 2014, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> This issue is not texlive specific, so I'd rather suggest the DDTP to
> treat formated list items the same as paragraphs. Then all packages
> using this will benefit from the solution, possibly after a one-time
> adjusting of the list.
I agree, but f
On Sb, 14 iun 14, 13:32:28, Beatrice Torracca wrote:
>
> I'd like to bring this subject to some attention again because I think
> the problem still stands. There are 2 (apparently, at the moment)
> conflicting issues:
>
> - package descriptions (all the texlive-* ones) are a nightmare to
> transl
I agree with Joe Dalton. One paragraph per letter is much better than
one very big paragraph. And it is not so strange as one paragraph per
CTAN package.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-i18n-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Holger Wansing wrote:
> What about simply listing the package names, without their
> description ...
Not good - apt-cache search foobar would not help here.
That *is* a very useful feature to search for particular CTAN
packages without having to know the title.
Norbert
Hi,
Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi Beatrice, hi Joe,
>
> On Sun, 15 Jun 2014, Joe Dalton wrote:
> > I have to agree on this one.
> > perhaps a compromise could be reach, so at least lines with the same letter
> > (a, b, c etc.) could be in one section.
>
> Hmm, as far as I understand Beatrice's
Hi Beatrice, hi Joe,
On Sun, 15 Jun 2014, Joe Dalton wrote:
> I have to agree on this one.
> perhaps a compromise could be reach, so at least lines with the same letter
> (a, b, c etc.) could be in one section.
Hmm, as far as I understand Beatrice's explanations, this wouldn't
help a lot, since
--
Den lør 14/6/14 skrev Beatrice Torracca :
Emne: Re: Bug#493778: Insanely long package description for texlive-latex-extra
Til: debian-i18n@lists.debian.org
Cc: 493...@bugs.debian.org
Dato: lørdag 14. juni 2014 13.32
On Wednesday 13 April 2011, at 23:18
+0200, Frank Küster wrote
On Wednesday 13 April 2011, at 23:18 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Davide Prina wrote:
>
> > On 07/04/2011 01:59, Norbert Preining wrote:
> >> On Mi, 06 Apr 2011, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> >>> Moreover, the nature of the list makes it constantly changing...or
> >>> never up-to-date...which gives
Davide Prina wrote:
> On 07/04/2011 01:59, Norbert Preining wrote:
>> On Mi, 06 Apr 2011, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>>> Moreover, the nature of the list makes it constantly changing...or
>>> never up-to-date...which gives the same result : it is impossible to
>>> translate in the DDTP.
>>
>> But i
On 07/04/2011 01:59, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Mi, 06 Apr 2011, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Moreover, the nature of the list makes it constantly changing...or
never up-to-date...which gives the same result : it is impossible to
translate in the DDTP.
But it is the list of packages included, and
Quoting Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at):
> On Mi, 06 Apr 2011, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > Moreover, the nature of the list makes it constantly changing...or
> > never up-to-date...which gives the same result : it is impossible to
> > translate in the DDTP.
>
> But it is the list of packages
On Mi, 06 Apr 2011, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Moreover, the nature of the list makes it constantly changing...or
> never up-to-date...which gives the same result : it is impossible to
> translate in the DDTP.
But it is the list of packages included, and as Hauke said, the main
aim is to allow peo
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 10:24:00PM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> I agree with Holger Wansing, who reported this bug about 3 years
> ago. This package has a way too long description.
>
> Moreover, the nature of the list makes it constantly changing...or
> never up-to-date...which gives the same
On 06/04/2011 22:24, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Moreover, the nature of the list makes it constantly changing...or
never up-to-date...which gives the same result : it is impossible to
translate in the DDTP.
translated! :-) ... Italian language
Please move that crazy list to README.Debian and g
I agree with Holger Wansing, who reported this bug about 3 years
ago. This package has a way too long description.
Moreover, the nature of the list makes it constantly changing...or
never up-to-date...which gives the same result : it is impossible to
translate in the DDTP.
Please move that crazy
15 matches
Mail list logo
