Re: critics about our presence at LinuxTag 2004

2004-07-09 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 10:34:59PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > Alexander Schmehl wrote: > > > > I you even can't do this, ask Joey for the code and change it in a > > > > way that he can administrate talks which don't fill a full hour. > > > that would allow Joey to schedule talks shorter than a

Re: critics about our presence at LinuxTag 2004

2004-07-09 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 11:06:22PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > Sven Luther wrote: > > > >> > IMHO any solution, which is forcing people to leave, is a bad > > > >> > solution. If it's crowded, it's crowded. And maybe the booth to > > > >> > small. > > > >> Trying to get more (booth) space out o

Re: critics about our presence at LinuxTag 2004

2004-07-09 Thread Alexander Schmehl
Good morning! * Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040709 08:40]: > I don't think the talk at the boot thingy is going to be all that > usefull. Now you have lost me. About what "boot thingy" talk are you talking? And why "is going to be"? Yours sincerely, Alexander signature.asc Descriptio

Re: critics about our presence at LinuxTag 2004

2004-07-09 Thread Martin Schulze
Alexander Schmehl wrote: > > I'd rather have Debian organise the booth more like the KDE project, > > i.e. concentrate on core information. > > Could you be more verbose please? Any other hints beside the "move > merchandising somewhere else" point (of which I think more positive than > in my last

Re: critics about our presence at LinuxTag 2004

2004-07-09 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Martin Schulze wrote: > > Also, we might want to consider pleading for a seperate 'Custom Debian > > Projects' booth right next to ours for the next LT (just like Linux > > ports), I believe a huge percentage of visitors were interested in them, > > so I think it be worthwhile

Re: IT/Linux Days at REGIO-Messe Lörrach

2004-07-09 Thread Alexander Schmehl
Good Morning! * Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040612 14:52]: > according to [1] REGIO-Messe Lörrach [2] will have IT / Linux Days. > Sounds interesting; specially because it seems to be not an IT related > fair. > Links: > 1: http://www.pro-linux.de/news/2004/6911.html > 2: http://www

Re: critics about our presence at LinuxTag 2004

2004-07-09 Thread Martin Schulze
Alexander Schmehl wrote: > = > You have express permission to sell the Mike posters for Debian! > > My share of the profit should be entirely donated to the Debian project. > All I ask for is a small mention somewhere that says this. > > Best of luck with it, and keep up the great work with a

Re: Berlinux 2004

2004-07-09 Thread Martin Schulze
Alexander Schmehl wrote: > Moin! > > For our non-german speaking friends: Nico asked, if Debian would like to > have a booth on the Berlinux, which will be 22nd to 23rd of october. > I answered him "Yes!". > > > Wow, that will be an interesting month: > 22nd to 23rd Berlinux, Frankfurt > 26th to

Re: critics about our presence at LinuxTag 2004

2004-07-09 Thread Martin Schulze
Sven Luther wrote: > On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 10:34:59PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > Alexander Schmehl wrote: > > > > > I you even can't do this, ask Joey for the code and change it in a > > > > > way that he can administrate talks which don't fill a full hour. > > > > that would allow Joey to

Re: critics about our presence at LinuxTag 2004

2004-07-09 Thread Martin Schulze
Sven Luther wrote: > > > Yep, from a monetary point of view, but in reality all that space behind > > > it was unused, thus free. This is a bit the same argument as the music > > > industry is claiming about pirated music, come to think of it :) > > > > The problem is that as soon as it is officia

Re: critics about our presence at LinuxTag 2004

2004-07-09 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 09:17:42AM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote: > Good morning! > > > * Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040709 08:40]: > > > I don't think the talk at the boot thingy is going to be all that > > usefull. > > Now you have lost me. About what "boot thingy" talk are you talking

Re: critics about our presence at LinuxTag 2004

2004-07-09 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 09:56:35AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > Sven Luther wrote: > > > > Yep, from a monetary point of view, but in reality all that space behind > > > > it was unused, thus free. This is a bit the same argument as the music > > > > industry is claiming about pirated music, come

Re: critics about our presence at LinuxTag 2004

2004-07-09 Thread Alexander Schmehl
Good morning, * Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040709 09:11]: > We should invite Ralf Nolden or Torsten Rahn to talk about their own > booth organisation. Good idea. I'll send them a link to this threat and request for comments. Thinking of that, it might be a good idea, to mention this

Re: critics about our presence at LinuxTag 2004

2004-07-09 Thread Alexander Schmehl
Good morning! * Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040709 10:03]: > "talk at the booth" thingy. > > Not sure, but i am not convinced you can held a 15 minute presentation > at the booth, at least not in the conditions we had this year. Well, we often did those guided installation tours, which is

Re: critics about our presence at LinuxTag 2004

2004-07-09 Thread Martin Schulze
Sven Luther wrote: > > > I don't think the talk at the boot thingy is going to be all that > > > usefull. > > > > Now you have lost me. About what "boot thingy" talk are you talking? And > > why "is going to be"? > > "talk at the booth" thingy. AAAaaa... One missing character and

Re: critics about our presence at LinuxTag 2004

2004-07-09 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 10:40:29AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > Sven Luther wrote: > > > > I don't think the talk at the boot thingy is going to be all that > > > > usefull. > > > > > > Now you have lost me. About what "boot thingy" talk are you talking? And > > > why "is going to be"? > > > >

Re: critics about our presence at LinuxTag 2004

2004-07-09 Thread Martin Schulze
Sven Luther wrote: > That said, the way the booth was setup, there where FAI demos on the > right, and merchandise sells on the right, so the only place where d-i > demos could have been made where on the projector at the center, not > sure this was solution for "in the booth" presentations though,

Re: critics about our presence at LinuxTag 2004

2004-07-09 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 11:39:38AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > Sven Luther wrote: > > That said, the way the booth was setup, there where FAI demos on the > > right, and merchandise sells on the right, so the only place where d-i > > demos could have been made where on the projector at the cente

Re: critics about our presence at LinuxTag 2004

2004-07-09 Thread Alexander Schmehl
* Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040709 12:07]: > > I thought that the beamer should be used for these kinds of presentation. > > I also thought that there should be a schedule for demo installations. > > However, I guess, that the schedule was missing somehow, need to get > > this fixed for nex

Re: critics about our presence at LinuxTag 2004

2004-07-09 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Alexander Schmehl wrote: > Well, I think the sub-projects "corner" was quite narrow. If Adamantix > would have arrived, too, it would have become nearly impossible to take > visitors there and show them the project and answer them questions. Well, I think there is always a reas

Re: critics about our presence at LinuxTag 2004

2004-07-09 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 10:34:59PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > Alexander Schmehl wrote: > > > > I you even can't do this, ask Joey for the code and change it in a > > > > way that he can administrate talks which don't fill a full hour. > > > that would allow Joey to schedule talks shorter than a

Re: Berlinux 2004

2004-07-09 Thread Nico Golde
Hallo Alexander, * Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-09 14:20]: > For our non-german speaking friends: Nico asked, if Debian would like to > have a booth on the Berlinux, which will be 22nd to 23rd of october. > I answered him "Yes!". > > Wow, that will be an interesting month: > 22n

Re: Berlinux 2004

2004-07-09 Thread Nico Golde
hi, * Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-09 14:20]: [...] > > IIRC the Linux User Groups in Wilhelmshaven (?) and Giessen are planning > > events for the end of october, too. > > Ignore the WHV event. It's way too small and the LUG only has a > booth which they already need on their ow

Re: Berlinux 2004

2004-07-09 Thread Martin Schulze
Nico Golde wrote: > hi, > * Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-09 14:20]: > [...] > > > IIRC the Linux User Groups in Wilhelmshaven (?) and Giessen are planning > > > events for the end of october, too. > > > > Ignore the WHV event. It's way too small and the LUG only has a > > booth w

Re: Berlinux 2004

2004-07-09 Thread Alexander Schmehl
* Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040709 15:11]: > > 22nd to 23rd Berlinux, Frankfurt > > The Berlinux is in Berlin ^^^ :) Sorry, if the uptime gets to high, my brain doesn't work very reliable. Yours sincerely, Alexander signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: critics about our presence at LinuxTag 2004

2004-07-09 Thread Michael Banck
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 10:06:39AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > Well, the idea being that since it is only free space they sponsor, it > doesn't cost them anything, Uhm sorry, but I thought people told you a week ago that there is no "free space that does not cost anything". Michael

Re: critics about our presence at LinuxTag 2004

2004-07-09 Thread Axel Beckert
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 02:33:29PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 10:06:39AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > Well, the idea being that since it is only free space they sponsor, it > > doesn't cost them anything, > > Uhm sorry, but I thought people told you a week ago that the

Re: critics about our presence at LinuxTag 2004

2004-07-09 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi! On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 05:06:41AM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote: > I send a email asking for permission to print and sell the UF-Poster > [1] and offered him a part of the profits we would make (and normaly > take us donation for us). Thanks, if it would not have been already happened, I wo