signatures are. Care to send URL to pages explaining the
> topic?
As per 'apt-cache show dpkg-sig':
Website is http://dpkg-sig.turmzimmer.net/
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpEBswLX1uTA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
nugo need be installed is not. In fact, that part of
the description could become invalid depending on the development of
both gnugo and ladder.app.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpOCDBYDPUI7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpDtLxYbln99.pgp
Description: PGP signature
es in handy. You
could send the email to the bug via that alias and then CC the person
you're discussing the patch with.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpkbE3C7W7hx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
;it does not work". I thought it
> more as a feature request (or idea) than bug report. I was asking about
> how is aptitude supposed to solve such situations, beacuse it isn't clear
> if it really should try to guess the correct packages to install.
The aptitude in unstable and tes
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libsocket++
Version : 1.12.12
Upstream Author : Herbert Straub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.linuxhacker.at/socketxx/download
* License :
Description : a family of C++ cla
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 07:52:35PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Copyright Notice:
> > -
> > Copyright (C) 1992-1996 Gnanasekaran Swaminathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Permission is grante
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: fish
Version : 1.9.1
Upstream Author : Axel Liljencrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://roo.no-ip.org/fish/
* License : GPL
Description : a friendly
t. There's no need for Mail-Followup-To. I agree
that the list manager shouldn't set it, but there's nothing wrong with
it being privately set.
If you want your reply sent somewhere other than where the sender thinks
it should be going, then you should be cognizant enough to change
o because it actually meets the need
> described above.
Reply-To specifically meets this need. It is even addressed in the
actual description of the field. If you want to send a private reply,
the From field gives you plenty of information. Otherwise, the Reply-To
field provides all the info
ng up the
inconsistency with Bram and add his response to the bug report.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
"
mv -f "$CONFFILE" "$CONFFILE.dpkg-bak"
else
# conffile isn't modified and will be restored in nagios-plugins-*
rm -f "$CONFFILE"
fi
fi
}
case "$1" in
install|upgrade)
if dpkg --compare-versions "$2" le "$OLDVERSION"; then
rm_conffile "/etc/file1"
fi
esac
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
harge' bit violate DFSG #1?
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
y you instead of everyone that
uses the computer.
HTH,
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
is in the same
directory (/usr/share/vim/vimcurrent/macros) as less.vim.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ectories the fonts reside in have moved. Your xorg.conf may
still be pointing to the old directories. Refer to
<http://wiki.debian.org/Xorg69To7> for other side-effects you may
experience from the upgrade.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
s
ne
being shipped by upstream. Hence Manoj's desire to use a different source
package name to correctly convey the fact that the source package is not
what is being shipped by upstream, but a modified version that meets the
requirements of the DFSG. How is it deceptive to rename the source
package when it is _not_ the same as the upstream source?
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
output variant or an alsaplayer-interface variant. As a
user, if I just want to look at the common files for some reason, I
sholudn't need to install alsaplayer-(output|gtk). Those would be fine
as Recommends.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 01:41:56PM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
> On Wed, 10 May 2006 09:04:14 -0400, James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:32:53AM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
> >> Hmm... alsaplayer-common Depends: on "alsaplayer-al
):
* Added support for coldplug and merged the hotplug scripts left.
Switched from udevstart to udevsynthesize. (Closes: #329226)
* Added conflicts with hotplug and with module-init-tools releases without
support for /etc/hotplug/blacklist.d/.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 200
sen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ldm)
Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (xfree86-driver-synaptics)
Debian X Strike Force (xdmx xserver-common
xserver-xorg-dbg x-window-system-core)
HTH,
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpsH8yIrP7fG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ce,
changes against the pristine upstream source. The merging of different
feature branches is done in some integration branch. Quilt patches are
a dependent series where the merging of changes is inherent in the patch
ordering. Thus it's easier to get an "upstream ready" patc
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 04:23:10PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.02.21.0020 +0100]:
> > The difference here being that feature branches are, in my experience,
> > changes against the pristine upstream source. The merging of
s a MU unlike a security upload. One can expect that a
decision was made about including (or not) the NMU in the next MU
upload.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
eyring. Backports.org even gives you explicit instructions on how to
do that.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
as previous versions didn't handle the newer changes
Format properly.
Other situations to be careful of are using debrsign (remote debsign must be
updated) and building packages in a sid chroot on a non-sid system.
Basically, make sure you're aware of which package versions you're actually
he package. In either case, debsign
is being invoked outside of the chroot in your native environment. Therefore
you need to make sure you have devscripts 2.10.25 (or your own backport if you
aren't running sid) in that environment.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[E
ether it happens at all. Hopefully other tools which parse the
.changes file have also learned from this experience and taken similar steps
to prevent operating on Formats they don't understand.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:56:01PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:34:06AM -0400, James Vega wrote:
> > On the plus side, debsign is now more resilient to future changes in the
> > Format of .changes files (as will mergechanges in the next upload).
that format
for native NMUs as per the earlier discussion on -devel[0]. Is this an
intended change to usk +nmuX for all NMUs or should the wording be updated to
reflect current behavior?
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:26 AM, nicolas vigier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2008, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>> No. Any key who had a single DSA signature created by the flawed version of
>> OpenSSL should be considered compromised. DSA requires a secret, random
>> number as part
titude will now list packages that are
newly obsolete. This doesn't work when a source is removed and
all its packages become obsolete, for technical reasons.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ipts as well as having the triggered call to update-menus
occur.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ian.org/477240
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
not POSIX.
The "local" keyword is an explicitly supported extension. These are
discussed in Section 10.4 of policy.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Even better would be programs using a library like enchant which
provides a front-end to the myriad other spell libraries. This allows
the user/application to use the library backend that works best for
their use case/language.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Veg
t, you could go to threads.html
and easily find the post about the perl vulnerability.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
or specific circumstances and the diverted/diverting
packages should be closely related (if not from the source).
Alternatives are the better solution when there are myriad,
non-conflicting sources which may provide the same file.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 07:34:53PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> James Vega writes ("Re: RFC: Idea for improved diversions and alternatives
> handling"):
> > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 06:40:23PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > What should happen when severa
ove scenarios is the use
of alternatives. There is the problem which brian brought up[0] about
using diversions when you can't rely on having alternatives setup
already but that would be obviated if dpkg internally handled both
diversions and alternatives.
[0] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
James
GP
t; it seems to work for most packages, though
> [...]
>
> "patch" indeded is the standard way nowadays. See policy 4.9.
I think you mean “recommended”, although not using that could be a
reason to have a README.source explaining how the package is handled.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
might be appropriate in some cases). But there
> was no announcement in this case.
Which Sandro mentioned in his email.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ner/p/pkg-perl-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org.html
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 02:08:26PM -0400, Jonathan Yu wrote:
> Hi James:
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:11 PM, James Vega wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:44:07AM -0400, Jonathan Yu wrote:
> >> Better yet, if we could periodically run it on all of the modules in
>
iners
vim
Pierre Habouzit
vim (U)
Teruyuki Morimura
jvim
Jan Christoph Nordholz
nvi
Brendan O'Dea
vile (U)
Miquel van Smoornburg
elvis-tiny
Paul van Tilburg
vile
James Vega
vim (U)
Colin Watson
vigor
Paweł Więcek
e3
[1] - See debi
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:19:25AM +0200, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 19:02 -0400, James Vega wrote:
> > tag 528494 help
> > thanks
> >
> > #528494 raised the idea of having vim-tiny (the default vi-like editor
> > on a base install) pr
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Marc Haber wrote:
>> And people know that the package is built automatically. All users I
>> know especially opted in to using the package instead of freshclam for
>> some-or-other reason.
>
> WHERE is that
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Now we have
> libkpathsea-dev depends libkpathsea4 (= 2007.dfsg.2-7)
> and I still get these errors. libkpathsea-dev is at version 2007.dfsg.2-7.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=547773
Fixed in Lintian 2.2.17
-
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 2:55 PM, George Danchev wrote:
> I've recently done a little survey about the fields used in our control files
> (*_Release files excluded). Currently there are ~80 different fields [1] used
> in
> testing and unstable, which basically fall into these groups:
>
> 1) listed
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Michael Gilbert
wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:27:25 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>> On mer, 2009-10-14 at 16:23 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> > the key litmus test is: does the application depend solely on non-free
>> > information to function properly. th
by another arch-dependent package. Many
of those either Recommend the relevant package or declare no
relationship at all.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tch for #346409, but there appears to be issues with it as
noted in the bug log.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> Could we add 'ReBuild-Depends' statement into debian/control to
> rebuild like packages when depends rebuild? But such kind of depends
> require some changes in buildd system.
This is only needed when the dependencies change something
's comments were (always a good idea).
Right. I'd think that if there were a negative review, the proposer of
the patch would go back to work on it further before resubmitting.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:12 AM, John Goerzen wrote:
> It would be *great* if this could be fixed before sarge comes out.
Sarge shipped with firefox, so no worries there. ;) Squeeze, on the
other hand, might need some work.
SCNR.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James V
gt; RFA'd? In fact it just had an upload on 10/31.
I'd guess that was a misinterpretation of Ross Burton's idle request for
someone to adopt it upstream.
http://www.burtonini.com/blog/computers/postr/new-maintainer-2009-11-12-10-49
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
e zack meant debsign, given some extra context that got
snipped, "Still the check for unsigned .changes is in dput and it's
pretty damn useful."
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
>> I think it *is* material in this instance:
>>
>> Versions of python-defaults in Debian:
>> unstable: 2.5.4-2
>> experimental: 2.5.4-3
>>
>> Version of package in Ubuntu:
>> Version: 2.6.4-0ubuntu1 (karmic)
>> Uploaded by: Matth
figuration file is left as is.
>
> # testing perl is required to avoid problem in embedded environments
> if [[ -e /usr/bin/perl ]]
'[[' for testing is a bashism. This should be
if [ -e /usr/bin/perl ]
or more accurately
if [ -x /usr/bin/perl ]
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/6132
Julien is correct. See #559863 and merged bugs.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
DME.source is supposed to refer back to the
patch system's documentation instead of duplicating it.
[0] - http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-readmesource
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
those had "NoDisplay=true" as one of
the fields[0]. While there may be a drive to add .desktop files to
packaging, there's a similar (sometimes overzealous, IME) drive to have
them not displayed by default.
[0] -
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuPackagingChanges?highlight=%28NoDisplay
kernel config? I brought up what seems to be the same (or at least
closely related) problem 4 years ago on lkml[0].
[0] - http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/4/5/209
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
as little involvement as
you like.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
;t find that thread in the list archives...
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> were the two previous discussions.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ment but both seem to be
dead in the water.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 09:28:51PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>vim (U)
Working on a tpu upload to fix issues for Lenny.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ki [4].
>
> Use Replaces:, just as for other files that move between packages.
As I understand it, you should also remove the conffile[0] from the
original package according. If you do not, you'll run into bugs like
#499451.
[0] - http://wiki.debian.org/DpkgConffileHandling
-
he energy of finalizing the proposal
> > (most likely via a DEP), so that is stops being an ever changing wiki
> > page.
>
> Well, not exactly, you cannot easily see the copyright file before
> installing the package, can you?
It's linked from the packages.d.o and PTS page for the package.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 07:06:26PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Jon Bernard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>e16menuedit
> => we don’t ship E16 anymore
packages.debian.org says otherwise.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
s
hings in Debian, not really missing it for a
> specific need.
Looks like that wasn't moved to ravel when people.debian.org changed
hosts. It's still accessible, for now, if you use oldpeople.d.o
instead.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
(U)
Gerrit Pape
bcron
raccess4vbox3
KELEMEN Péter
arpwatch
Nick Rusnov
nmh
Santiago Vila
smartlist
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
has been discussed various times in the past on this list, is
difficult to determine.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
ugh.
James
[0] - http://lists.debian.org/debian-tex-maint/2007/11/msg6.html
[1] - http://nchip.livejournal.com/11175.html
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
shi Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
shishi-dbg
Paul van Tilburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
libdaemons-ruby1.8 (U)
Marcela Tiznado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
when
Juan Esteban Monsalve Tobon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
libgii1-target-x (U)
liblpsolve55-dev
Gerhard Tonn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
gcc-3.3-base (U)
gcc-3.4-base (U)
Josh Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
libpthread-stubs0 (U)
Theodore Y. Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
e2fsck-static
Utopia Maintenance Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
libavahi-common-data
Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
libantlr-dev (U)
Andrea Veri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
libagg-dev
Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
libqt3-headers (U)
mga-vid-source
Neal H. Walfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
gnumach (U)
gnumach-dev (U)
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
os-prober (U)
Torsten Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
libmrss0-dbg (U)
libnxml0-dbg (U)
paintlib2c2a-dbg (U)
Ian Wienand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
libatomic-ops-dev
Patrick Winnertz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
libitalc
Alexander Wirt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
iproute-dev
iproute-doc
Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
etl-dev (U)
Paweł Więcek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
e3
Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
dballe-common
libcnf-dev
libdballe-bufrex-doc
libdballe-core-doc
libdballe-db-doc
libdballe-msg-doc
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
dbg package contains debugging symbols
for.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
, will update B later
> - remove A
> - installing new A, but already exist
> ==> FAIL
Package: A
Depends: B
Conflicts: B (<< newversion)
Replaces: B (<< newversion)
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
being affected by Java's brokenness with bindv6only (c.f.,
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560056)?
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
ke ftp-master didn't take to that.
Or they're waiting for other items to be implemented before moving
forward, just like the text you quoted says.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
gh
the current package forces icedove usage.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Lintian tags that you don't consider
useful if you use this option.”
In other words, if you think the tag is useful then fix it, otherwise
ignore it.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
MOAOLTDR, by which I mean
> "simply a matter of adding one line to debian/rules".
You make the mistake of assuming everyone use debhelper.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
time, I can add it to my list of things to look at when I
next have some time to work on devscripts. I'm hoping to get some soon,
but things have been a bit hectic lately.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.deb
y this: it
> > generates a "3.0 (quilt)" source package using a VCS repository as input.
>
> I guess what we should have is additional line in it or additional file
> to record vcs used for packaging which will not interface with the basic
> operation of other tools.
From /usr/share/lintian/checks/binaries:
if ($info->field('source') ne 'zlib' and $info->field('source') ne 'klibc'
and $strings =~ /(?:in|de)flate (?:\d[ \w.\-]{1,20}[\w.\-])/m) {
tag "embedded-zlib", $file;
}
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Therefore, there is no reason to
have a specific browser name in the package name and should instead use
a common naming convention.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
header and the User-Agent
header was only added in response to #493884. While the User-Agent
header is useful, I could see backing out this change so bts doesn't
require the non-standard -a flag.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
to require $DEBEMAIL or $EMAIL to be
set, then I have no problem removing our use of the mail command.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
the only member, then you do a "newgrp
> bar" for foo, foo is no longer in a UPG situation, so his umask should
> be 0022 at that point.
Except /etc/profile won't be sourced again unless "newgrp - " is
used, right?
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 Jam
source version in Lenny and Squeeze. 746 when comparing
Etch and Squeeze.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
urce format. That's not going to change overnight and
the Dpkg developers have already stated that the deprecation of an
implied source format is a long term goal (likely Squeeze+2).
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
s.debian.org/487753dc.5020...@cox.net
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
version. If you want to help achieve that, take a look at the
bug list for that transition:
http://tinyurl.com/Py26Transition
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
rovide a
standard implementation of actions like this.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikux_6xkwud9ppo8h-_w7zn_nxnypx63gqox...@mail.gmail.com
of a stable
release. This is not the case with the Mozilla-related packages, as
new version updates (other than the security fixes already being
handled) are a nicety, not a requirement.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-r
change among my fellow
Vim maintainers. I think the vim-tiny package has ended up being more
work than it's worth.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
release needs to be configured first.
3.5 is an overview. 7.2 has the details:
Depends
This declares an absolute dependency. A package will not be
configured unless all of the packages listed in its Depends field
have been correctly configured.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 20
http://bugs.debian.org/583336
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktilzor8zd1o9z0skwucltbcsctfyxxlxyt6i4...@mail.gmail.com
oad.
>
> That gives a 404. source.debian.net doesn't, but gives you a page with
> as full contents the eight characters 'hallo...'
According to <http://wiki.debian.org/source.debian.org> it's still in
the idea/planning phase.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
