On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Michael Gilbert <michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:27:25 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: >> On mer, 2009-10-14 at 16:23 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: >> > the key litmus test is: does the application depend solely on non-free >> > information to function properly. these google applications fail >> > this test because the licensing of the data itself is at the user's >> > discretion. hence, they are permitted in main. >> >> I don't really think clive use data licensed at the user discretion. > > i agree, clive only functions properly when it has access to the > non-free content on youtube, so it would pass my litmus test, and should > be moved to contrib.
What makes youtube content (or any of the media content from the many other sites clive supports) automatically non-free? Doesn't it depend on how the media's author has decided to license their work? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
