On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 09:51:04PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote: > 2008/12/2 Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > [ M-F-T set to -devel ] > > > > On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 07:30:54PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote: > >> We should somehow tag those conflictive licenses with debtags, so that > >> users can filter out the ones they don't wont easily. I don't object > > > > Except that debtags are right now for binary packages, whereas > > copyright is for source packages. > > > > Moreover, copyright is something already coded (and correctly "fixed") > > in debian/copyright. > > > > The solution to your problem already exists (actually, it has been > > *designed* for that): http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat > > , it "just" needs someone with the energy of finalizing the proposal > > (most likely via a DEP), so that is stops being an ever changing wiki > > page. > > Well, not exactly, you cannot easily see the copyright file before > installing the package, can you?
It's linked from the packages.d.o and PTS page for the package. -- James GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
