l required in stable/oldstable isn't it?
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
added in
debian/control to help tracking things.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
there known cases where this is a required condition?
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ource
package. Maybe something like
Embedded-Sources: , ...
Static-Build-Depends: , ...
with usual version relationships.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
es, this list has always included apps linking statically.
>
> Cheers,
> Moritz
>
Anyway having a way to distinguish source-embedded by statically-linked
would be useful. IMHO the second case is almost always an error, but
for special cases (static linked shell for instance).
--
gt; >
> Additionally, packages with embedded sources require patching, while
> packages which statically link only require rebuilding.
>
Yes, that was the ratio for distinguishing the two cases...
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
a subdirectory of /usr/lib/tcltk or /usr/share/tcltk (not right
> now).
>
/usr/share/tcltk/$package for tcl/tk scripts and
/usr/lib/tcltk/$package for shared libs (extensions).
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
vable that the library is not backward compatible at every new
release. Issues with specific versions should be managed
and solved: having a new source for every release is simply not
acceptable. BTW, this is not the only case of such a mess around for
libraries (maybe some upstreams should be spanked...)
t;. I'm not sure why the burden
> here should be on BDB alone.
>
That remembers me some other cases where people insist to use a non
stable C++ API instead of the C one. One could ask himself who is
guilty: the upstream who releases as public his private functions,
or developer who
PROTECTED];tag=oldbdb;dist=unstable
>
>
It appears to me that essentially it is a problem moving from 4.2 to
4.6, but I see nothing about the intermediate versions. Having 2
releases is largely better than having 5 versions around, isn't it?
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBS
gt; the team. It more accurately reflects who's caring about the packages.
>
I agree, but how managing this thing is a team policy. In DebianGis
we also remove uploaders after a reasonable period of non-contributing
time.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
situation is worst than
what it seems :) I guess mass bug filing should be tempted in order
to change the current status and warns as many maintainer as possible.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
;s
> 18k packages on our own.
>
Wouldn't be the case to add a suitable control field, as proposed
in a previous thread for that case?
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tons of developers and
maintainers that need to build against 2.8, and I doubt a transition
plan from 2.6 has sense due to API and behaviors changes. We have
simply to cope with two different versions, as already happens
for other libraries.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
choice of 2.6 instead of 2.8 or the
future 3.0 is definitively a per-program ones, it is not
a duty of the library package.
Also if one is not able to cope with patches and bugs of a specific
library, why not calling for helpers or giving up? Inaction is
not a solution.
--
Francesco P. Lovergin
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 04:03:56PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2007, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > So what about that? 2.8 is around since almost 1 year, and this delay
> > is not justifiable IMHO. There are now tons of developers and
> > maintainers that
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 10:52:47AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> future 3.0 is definitively a per-program ones, it is not
> a duty of the library package.
s/package/packager/
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
manual dump/restore) at
the
time of etch->lenny transition due to geometry changes, too.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rt from here: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelCustomCompilation
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
long description.
Support leve is generally subject to frequent changes, so why
polluting descriptions with those things?
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
memory does not fail) no contact by other
supposed interested people in the meantime.
I find quite superfluous waiting another month in the long way
to a wxwidgets 2.8 package stabilization. It needs action and now.
PS:
I'm not personally interested in supporting
wxwidgets because already heav
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 10:21:08AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> Now, what are YOUR plans?"
>
> No answer.
Sorry Ron, No _email_ answer. We talked in IRC about that indeed, I
forgot that.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
27;m not enable to manage the
upstream messy building system...
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
s-* packages because both provide manpages
> > such as passd.1, passwd.5, etc.
> >
This is quite common among all translated pages.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gt;
> to fix the problem that was reported by the ddpo daemon. This
> worked for Sparc. Any hint what I could do to trigger a rebuild
> of the latest package version on Mipsel (except of uploading an
> unchanged package)?
>
> Kind regards
>
>Andreas.
>
Asking a gi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Francesco P. Lovergine"
* Package name: geographiclib
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Charles Karney et al.
* URL : http://geographiclib.sourceforge.net/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description
e 8.4, as minimum requirement
or die.
Be warned ;-)
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100401125245.gb4...@blegrez.ba.issia.cnr.it
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 03:03:51PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:47:37PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Source: netcdf
> > Version: 1:4.1.1-2
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: FTBFS
> >
> > Hi,
> >
&
parallel in multi-threaded and MPI environments, can process
huge images and much more.
(Source package has been renamed to avoid collision wth an existing
python package).
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
configuration has some problems. Please ask on d-users.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101129142128.gc19...@blegrez.ba.issia.cnr.it
d?
>
It definitively depends on the specific packageis. When ever it happened to
me, I followed up all the maintainer(s) involved and we found all together
a way to have a working pool of packages.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
e, maybe some of them
> should be orphaned or dropped instead?
>
+1
Very outdated debhelper versions, policy versions and very aged last upload
dates
could be signs of MIA developers and abandonware.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.d
discussions
> around varoius Python helpers and so on).
+1
this is exactly the reason why we adopted *one* default Tcl/Tk instead
of the broken-by-design use of admin-changeable alternatives. Interpreters
are not the right target for such an approach. We have to choose a safe
default versio
ct place to
start this kind of flame wars :) In the meantime I'm afraid there is not
another list, but for d-d, where discussion on this kind of things can
be accepted.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
probably xtradius.
System password checking is present for portability with non-linux
platform essentially, and for historical reasons, too. A lots of those
servers are derived from the original livingston's implementation, but all
add alternatives forms of authentication and accounting. It's an admin's
choice.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
PROTECTED] is ok now.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
, doesn't it?
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
re is a regression),
so what's the problem?
c. Very few packages are seriuosly broken on some archs. Their problems are
generally due either to compiler/binutils problems or upstream
coding. In both cases removing them on some archs could be a
profitable solution for rele
uto-build it first and, if no upstream/package faults, we let it in,
> > we
> > get less RC bugs.
> Exactly this was the idea. I'm unsure whether experimental could serve as
> this kind of staging area.
>
A FTBFS for a new package is not a RC error. Only regressions are RC.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 11:33:05AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
>
> > b. They are already kept off testing (if there is a regression),
> >so what's the problem?
> The problem is that other packages which might dep
the benefit that it
> doesn't require that often administrator action (and perhaps an staging
> area where the newest things are in, and that is moved to stable once
> everything is done).
>
Yep, that was the idea behind the need of a policy and a RM.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
ed
in respect with security.d.o is all in this pov.
Incidentally, volatile could also be used to upgrade stable for interactive use,
which is probably the major reason of obsolescence for stable, but that's
questionable.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
problems. It is really a memory
and cpu hog. I doubt it is usable as is on any box without
a good deal of horsepower and memory. I would add at least
a big warning in its NEWS file about this, until its problems will be
not solved.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
rs is a non-sense, plain and clear. The volatile archive
is having more and more sense.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
s a program which just
> can't run on that machine.
>
Just for your information SA3 was almost unusable on my P4 1.4Ghz with 128MB.
It's not a dedicated box, but it's adequate for my workstation use with
wmaker.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
>
I had -m2 and each child canibalized up 20M of VM in just a few minutes.
With 128M that makes difference. I'm now quite happily using razor
with only very few false positives and a very high success rate in
filtering spam.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
Indeed currently iptables rules need to be loaded with pre-up scripting
in /etc/network/interfaces. Old init.d scripts are deprecated and not
installed at all.
> There are a lot of ways to setup a firewall in Debian [1] I rather not have
> yet another package to do this.
>
Agree.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
'm thinking
to the pre-1.0 version of mozilla in woody: upgrading to a sane 1.0
version in stable by volatile could be considered, solving many
functional problems and being a sane (and safe) possibility.
Other major upgrades (e.g. mozilla-current) are backports.org concerns.
We have currently a few software of large use in those conditions, e.g.
firefox/thunderbird (but note that those programs are really in better
conditions in respect with the old woody mozilla)
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
modifications
without author's permission. OpenMosix is fully GPL, instead.
I'm simply proposing the complete removing of mosix from archive, if none
could adopt it and manage properly its moving in non-free.
Ciao
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
pgpi5sg3X0F01.pgp
Description: PGP signature
per use, see some old flames about similar
cases. And it generally causes confusion in bug submitters' mind:
how many of them knows the difference between a fixed and a closed bug?
A brief note about NMU changes incorporation in changelog
and closing those bugs in BTS by hand is more correct IMO.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
sys/net/ipv4/ip_no_pmtu_disc
does not solve the problem.
Ideas?
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 11:42:37AM +0200, Christian Surchi wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 10:42:43AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > Package: kernel-image-2.4
> > Version: N/A
> > Severity: important
> >
> > This is an issue for the kernel f
pt-get install kdm kdebase-crypto kde-devel
This worked for me.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 11:07:01AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> "Francesco P. Lovergine" wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 10:06:13AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > What is the recommended way to install Gnome o
for task-tcltk-dev
W: duplicate task info for task-tex
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
E: Couldn't find package task-debug
It seems really outdated in unstable. I do not know for testing.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
alias contains things like:
>
What if the gdm pkg cut off `plain' english?
Maybe a choice among english_british and english_american could
me more correct.
What about english_italian also :) ? We speak brooklino instead of
plain english, generally ...
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
t including OPL under /usr/share/common-licenses ?
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 02:30:54PM +0200, David N. Welton wrote:
> "Francesco P. Lovergine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Some e-books are available also under Open Publication License.
> > What do you think of a pseudo package `ebooks-dev' which collec
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 03:05:09PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 02:30:54PM +0200, David N. Welton wrote:
> > "Francesco P. Lovergine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Some e-books are available also under Open Publica
case HTML is preferred. But so many books are only available
in PDF format - which can be printed in non-letter formats easily.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 06:08:30PM +0200, Filip Van Raemdonck wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 04:48:12PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> >
> > It could be nice if all you send me a collection of ebooks you think
> > is a must for a developer. Only HT
998. Latest NMU is in Nov 2000.
I'll check if this package can be adopted. In this case I could close
this ITP.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
but
4:2.2.0.20010822-1 is to be installed
Depends: artsbuilder but it is not going to be installed
Depends: noatun but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libarts-mpeglib (>= 4:2.2.1-1) but it is not going to be
installed
E: Sorry, broken packages
Maybe, I'm missing somethings...
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
lain with my upstream tomorrow
morning for this, when I'll see him... in the bath, in front to the mirror :(
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
e the developers some time to actually do something about it.
> And _then_ _consider_ filing bugs (by discussing it here again).
>
> --
> Martin Michlmayr
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
I agree. As for yardradius, the bug could be in fact secondary - programs
works anyway.
Severity level should be evaluated in every single case.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
too much maintainers are not really active
and too much pkgs are built up without a RFP. Some packages are
built starting from beta-quality sw, and this is not a good practice.
Burocracy cannot solve these problems. Maintainers intelligence could.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
st seen more than 1 year ago at people.d.o.
Maybe a proposal of adoption could be done...
He mntns that pkg only.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
NMU.
>
> If you want to make it clear that the upload is sponsored an entry in the
> changelog should be the right solution. Before I became a maintainer I
> added to the changelog entry of every package that was sponsored for me a
> line
>
> * Upload sponsored by Tony Manci
; developer.
>
Broken, you could search in BTS for wnpp bugs in the meantime.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
Please, have a look at #127948 (should merge #128195)
which should be grave bugs IMHO.
Is this solved also now? I removed KDE at all in my sid.
To reinstall it, kpackage issue needs to be solved.
This is a PIV 1400Mhz, maybe I could help :)
Thanks for your efforts.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
ot;It's newer" is not a good reason :) We could
discover new problems in linking qt2 with png3 we had not before.
Anyway, it's done. Maybe something about these bad practices
is already present in the Policy Manual. If not something should be
obviuosly proposed.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
Hi debfolks
I'm using this command:
debmirror /users/debian --nosource -h -d woody
in order to have a local copy of i386 stuff for our net.
What is the damn reason why it copies potato distribution instead?
I'm missing something?
Thanks
PS: please cc me...
--
Francesco P.
rver
configurations, but that's another problem...
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
With the release of 1.3.2 of proftpd is finally in place prxs and the whole
infrastructure
for building third-parties modules. I know currently at least about 30
different modules
available as non-core and some of them are sometimes requested by users.
See http://
that can be
useful with all kinds of applications that manage spatial data.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
--
Francesco P. L
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 04:56:20PM +0100, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> how to had new services in /etc/services database?
>
> ciao
> cate
Asking netbase maintainer(s)? Just read /etc/services about that.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
Do you agree?
A monolithic source package simplies strict interdependencies. Splitting
is pointeless if source packages have not different releasing road maps
or you have not to encourage independent teams creations.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
> Regards
> -r
Have a look onto the debian-gis svn repository where some gdal-ecw stuff
resides. Ecw support can be done using by plugin support.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
,
and anyway if I remember correctly you could experience some problems
with older versions and ECW support.
> I must say that running the standard configure && make works but I would
> prefer not to do a make install against debian packages.
>
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To
mplementation in our distribution is a viable possibility,
but diverged by upstream: that should be done in the library package, while
the serial and mpi -dev packages still should retain the same names (and
conflict each other). This is what I will implement for the HDF5 case.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
a data
providing infrastructure, but I missed the whole thread conclusion
(if any).
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
he same script in your documentation. Note
that GMT coastlines format is quite known and used so i'm quite sure
you can provide eventually some helper script for possible format
conversions.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
issue by convincing Oracle
to change license or even better by re-implementing the package.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://
.8.4 | libhdf5-1.8.4, libquadmath0 (>=
4.6), libstdc++6 (>= 4.4.0)
So at least at packaging level, that should be fixed to follow the previous
criteria.
That said, indeed NetCDF provides nc_create_par and nc_open_par in both serial
and parallel versions, but needs to be built with --enable-paralle
if it is painful, perhaps
> Debian could pioneer something and pass patches back to upstream?
>
> Thoughts?
>
I'm afraid it is quite difficult having such kind of proposal accepted
by upstreams. It implies changes for both them in library use, that they
could be not ready to in
access to the git repository,
so a branch can be prepared for having a parallel flavor too.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: htt
lve the main problem i.e. simplify maintainer
life.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140217120451.gd4...@blegrez.ba.issia.cnr.it
Package: wnpp
Owner: Francesco Paolo Lovergine
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libalien-build-perl
Version : 2.80
Upstream Author : Graham Ollis
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Alien-Bu
::Build for new stuff.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Francesco P. Lovergine"
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libgeo-gdal-ffi-perl
Version : 0.1
Upstream Contact: Ari Jolma
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Geo-GDAL-FFI
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Francesco P. Lovergine"
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libdata-find-perl
Version : 0.03
Upstream Contact: Andy Armstrong
* URL : https://github.com/AndyA/Data--Find
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Francesco P. Lovergine"
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libgeo-wkt-simple-perl
Version : 0.05
Upstream Contact: Yuto KAWAMURA
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/KAWAMURAY/Geo-WKT-S
On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 12:39:55PM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
wrote:
In summary: would running unstable instead of bookworm let me find more bugs
than running bookworm with unstable chroots? For my specific work: yes,
absolutely. Am I upgrading from bookworm to unstable or at least
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 09:09:45PM +0100, Sirius wrote:
Hi there,
This is quite actively discussed on Fedora lists.
https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/
https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/03/29/4
Worth taking a look if action need to be taken on Debian.
Speaking ab
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Francesco P. Lovergine"
* Package name: ypbind
Version : 2.7.2
Upstream Author : Thorsten Kukuk
* URL : http://www.linux-nis.org/
* License : GPL, LGPL, BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : Client
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Francesco P. Lovergine"
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Francesco P. Lovergine"
* Package name: ypserv
Version : 4.1
Upstream Author : Thorsten Kukuk
* URL : http://www.linux-nis.org/
* License
much better state.
https://bitbucket.org/naviserver/naviserver
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
st.
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=804043
[2]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-tcltk-devel/2018-February/003546.html
Kind regards,
Héctor
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
I would propose a replace roadmap for people using aolserver4 (in both testing
and stable) with usual replaces/provides/conflicts items, and add a *big* warn
in NEWS about known changes and incompatibilities.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
implementation was written in pure Perl, with portability and
correctness in mind. It implements the full ANSI standard for Fortran 77
Formats (or at least it should). It was not written with speed in mind, so if
you need to process millions of records it may not be what you need.
--
Francesco P
101 - 200 of 205 matches
Mail list logo
