On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 07:37:42PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > Now it's running at -m5 (the suggested value) and I have not had > problems since. Of course, now I only get half the throughput, and > my queue has not emptied for a whole day because SA is unable to > keep up. >
I had -m2 and each child canibalized up 20M of VM in just a few minutes. With 128M that makes difference. I'm now quite happily using razor with only very few false positives and a very high success rate in filtering spam. -- Francesco P. Lovergine
