On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:40:47PM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote: > On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:32:09PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > > If this is not solved, we really should consider to re-introduce > > spamassassin 2 as spamassassin, and the version 3 as spamassassin3. > > Or we should not consider it. > > In such case 2.64 will become obsolete even faster than 2.20 did in woody, > since it is obsoleted by 3.x. Having 2.64 which is only worth having for the > bayessian methods is brainless since we have other bayesian tools for the > trick, some of them considered even more efficient: bogofilter, dspam, > crm114,... >
Unfortunately, it is also used as the only anti-spam plugin in other software, such as amavis AFAIK. As pointed before anyway, releasing those kind of tools and thinking of having them frozen for a couple of years is a non-sense, plain and clear. The volatile archive is having more and more sense. -- Francesco P. Lovergine
