On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 12:52:33AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > That's equivalent to an indefinite quarantine; according to BDB upstream, > OpenLDAP's problems with various versions are a consequence of abusing the > interface, not of using "advanced features". I'm not sure why the burden > here should be on BDB alone. >
That remembers me some other cases where people insist to use a non stable C++ API instead of the C one. One could ask himself who is guilty: the upstream who releases as public his private functions, or developer who use them ? :-D -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
