Re: Vcs-* and shared repos

2016-06-24 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:24:43PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote: > The Debian Haskell team has migrated a while back from per-package > repositories to a single repository which contains the packaging (only > debian/) for the vast majority of packages > (https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-haskell/DHG_p

Re: Neomutt packages available

2016-06-24 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:10:50PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > I am pleased to announce the availability of neomutt [0] packages for > Debian. Hints for installation you'll find at [1]. snip > > I've packaged neomutt for Debian. A Debian ITP [2] is filed. > [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b

Re: Neomutt packages available

2016-06-24 Thread Clint Adams
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 09:24:27AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > Rather than work with the existing team Elimar has persisted with > efforts to package neomutt separately and has even suggested a *different* > team is set up to maintain neomutt, versus pkg-mutt. Good. > A fork by any other nam

Re: Neomutt packages available

2016-06-24 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 08:30:22AM +, Clint Adams wrote: > Territorial bullshit. You seem to be either suggesting that the mutt people should be prevented from their pre-existing plan to move to neomutt, or we should have two neomutt packages in Debian at the same time. -- Jonathan Dowland P

Re: Neomutt packages available

2016-06-24 Thread Ian Jackson
Clint Adams writes ("Re: Neomutt packages available"): > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 09:24:27AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > Rather than work with the existing team Elimar has persisted with > > efforts to package neomutt separately and has even suggested a *different* > > team is set up to maint

Re: Neomutt packages available

2016-06-24 Thread Clint Adams
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 09:41:38AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > You seem to be either suggesting that the mutt people should be prevented from > their pre-existing plan to move to neomutt, or we should have two neomutt > packages in Debian at the same time. I am suggesting that I remember what

Re: Neomutt packages available

2016-06-24 Thread Ian Jackson
Clint Adams writes ("Re: Neomutt packages available"): > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 09:41:38AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > You seem to be either suggesting that the mutt people should be prevented > > from > > their pre-existing plan to move to neomutt, or we should have two neomutt > > packag

Re: Neomutt packages available

2016-06-24 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Clint Adams , 2016-06-24, 08:44: I am suggesting that I remember what happened with mutt-kz. What happened with mutt-kz? -- Jakub Wilk

mutt concentration camp (was Re: Neomutt packages available)

2016-06-24 Thread Holger Levsen
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 08:44:18AM +, Clint Adams wrote: > I am suggesting that I remember what happened with mutt-kz. I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to say that I think the name "mutt-kz" is a NO-GO. I know it's from the authors initials, but… to me it sounds

Re: Neomutt packages available

2016-06-24 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Ian Jackson writes: > I don't think there is anything wrong with having a competing package. There is. I'm fairly sure the security team will not be happy... Packaging the *same* project twice seems even more useless busy work for them than packaging lots of forks of the same project (which some p

Re: mutt concentration camp (was Re: Neomutt packages available)

2016-06-24 Thread Víctor M . Jáquez L .
On 06/24/16 at 09:05am, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 08:44:18AM +, Clint Adams wrote: > > I am suggesting that I remember what happened with mutt-kz. > > I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to say > that I think the name "mutt-kz" is a NO-GO. I kn

Re: mutt concentration camp (was Re: Neomutt packages available)

2016-06-24 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Victor, On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:30:16AM +0200, Víctor M. Jáquez L. wrote: > I'm sorry, I didn't know. Thanks. > The name comes from the main author of the project: Karel Zak. [...] > Independently of the badly chosen name, I accepted to deprecate mutt-kz in > favor or neomutt. wow, very coo

Bug#828042: ITP: libssw -- fast SIMD parallelized implementation of the Smith-Waterman algorithm

2016-06-24 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sascha Steinbiss * Package name: libssw Version : git20160511.7d84de2 Upstream Author : Mengyao Zhao * URL : https://github.com/mengyao/Complete-Striped-Smith-Waterman-Library * License : MIT Programming Lang: C Des

Re: mutt concentration camp (was Re: Neomutt packages available)

2016-06-24 Thread Holger Levsen
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 09:05:16AM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > And I don't think this is a german thing (well…) - the term "KZ" is > known by millions of non german speaking people, cause their loved ones > suffered and died there. s#non german speaking people#non german speaking and german spea

Re: Keysigning via Video Conferencing

2016-06-24 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting ja...@teacaster.net (2016-06-23 23:17:11) > PGP Key Signing for New Members is purely an identification process, > to prove that you are who you say you are. This provides the Debian > Foundation with the assurance that you can be trusted monitoring their > infrastructure, uploading pack

Re: mutt concentration camp (was Re: Neomutt packages available)

2016-06-24 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Holger, On 24 June 2016 at 06:05, Holger Levsen wrote: > I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to say > that I think the name "mutt-kz" is a NO-GO. I know it's from the authors > initials, but… to me it sounds like "mutt-hitler" or probably worse. Wait... What? So are

Re: mutt concentration camp (was Re: Neomutt packages available)

2016-06-24 Thread Holger Levsen
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 07:33:40AM -0300, Tiago Ilieve wrote: > His package is in the archive for over two years[3] and > looks like no one felt offended enough to fill a bug before. I only noticed mutt-kz three months ago… And I'd also be fine with a rename to mutt-karel or mutt-karel-zak. -

Re: mutt concentration camp (was Re: Neomutt packages available)

2016-06-24 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Holger Levsen , 2016-06-24, 09:05: I am suggesting that I remember what happened with mutt-kz. I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to say that I think the name "mutt-kz" is a NO-GO. I know it's from the authors initials, but… to me it sounds like "mutt-hitler" or

Re: GCC 6 & binutils for the Debian stretch release

2016-06-24 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > As announced a year ago [1], GCC 6 will be the default GCC for the Debian > stretch release. GCC 6 is now available in testing, and can be made the > default > by installing the gcc/g++ packages from experimental. Known build failures >

Re: Vcs-* and shared repos

2016-06-24 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Freitag, den 24.06.2016, 09:17 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Dowland: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:24:43PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote: > > The Debian Haskell team has migrated a while back from per-package > > repositories to a single repository which contains the packaging (only > > debian/) for the

Bug#828059: ITP: google-android-m2repository-installer -- This is a packaged script that automatically downloads Google's Android support m2 repository package and unpacks it into Debian-friendly path

2016-06-24 Thread Mouaad Aallam
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mouaad Aallam * Package name: google-android-m2repository-installer Version : 33.0.0 Upstream Author : Google, Inc. * URL : https://developer.android.com/topic/libraries/support-library/index.html * License : Apache 2.0

Re: Vcs-* and shared repos

2016-06-24 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Joachim Breitner (2016-06-24 16:02:57) > I never really understood why there is a games team; assuming that > technically, almost every game is an island. (Ok, legal issues might > be similar). This is a very different situation than programming > library packaging. Because not all team

Re: Vcs-* and shared repos

2016-06-24 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 03:02:57PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: > I never really understood why there is a games team; assuming that > technically, almost every game is an island. (Ok, legal issues might be > similar). This is a very different situation than programming library > packaging. > >

Re: Keysigning via Video Conferencing

2016-06-24 Thread Nikolaus Rath
On Jun 23 2016, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 12:52:35PM -0700, Nikolaus Rath wrote: >> On Jun 23 2016, Lars Wirzenius wrote: >> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:23:07AM -0700, Nikolaus Rath wrote: >> >> As I said in my other email, I am wondering if the extra burden is worth >> >>

Re: mutt concentration camp (was Re: Neomutt packages available)

2016-06-24 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:59:00PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Holger Levsen , 2016-06-24, 09:05: > >>I am suggesting that I remember what happened with mutt-kz. > >I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to say > >that I think the name "mutt-kz" is a NO-GO. I know it's fr

Re: Keysigning via Video Conferencing

2016-06-24 Thread Nikolaus Rath
On Jun 23 2016, ja...@teacaster.net wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > Sorry to interject in this matter however it is beginning to become > repetitive. You may be contributing to this, because you clearly haven't actually read the thread. > If a Debian Developer is to sign your key, they will need to

Re: mutt concentration camp (was Re: Neomutt packages available)

2016-06-24 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Adam Borowski , 2016-06-24, 17:32: I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to say that I think the name "mutt-kz" is a NO-GO. I know it's from the authors initials, but… to me it sounds like "mutt-hitler" or probably worse. Send complaints to Karel's parents... Eve

Re: mutt concentration camp (was Re: Neomutt packages available)

2016-06-24 Thread Muri Nicanor
hi On 06/24/2016 05:32 PM, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:59:00PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: >> * Holger Levsen , 2016-06-24, 09:05: I am suggesting that I remember what happened with mutt-kz. >>> I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to say >>> tha

Re: Announcing new pkg-security team

2016-06-24 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hi, That is great news, i maintain the package goldeneye(a HTTP DoS Test Tool), which i believe it would be nice to maintain together with the security team, i started to package T50[1] too and i believe it is aligned with the security team too, at least that's what i thought when i read in the al

Bug#828073: ITP: prometheus-alertmanager -- Handle and deliver alerts created by Prometheus

2016-06-24 Thread Martín Ferrari
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Martín Ferrari" * Package name: prometheus-alertmanager Version : 0.2.1 Upstream Author : The Prometheus Authors * URL : https://prometheus.io/ * License : Apache-2 Programming Lang: Go Description : Handle and d

Re: Neomutt packages available

2016-06-24 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
* Jonathan Dowland [2016-06-24 09:24 +0100]: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:10:50PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > I am pleased to announce the availability of neomutt [0] packages for > > Debian. Hints for installation you'll find at [1]. > snip > > > > I've packaged neomutt for Debian. A D

Re: Announcing new pkg-security team

2016-06-24 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello Samuel, On Fri, 24 Jun 2016, Samuel Henrique wrote: > How does this team relate to the forensics team? It seems confusing to have > a forensics team and a security team which will treat forensics packages. > > In my opinion, we should have only one team integrating both, maybe the > forensi

Re: Neomutt packages available

2016-06-24 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > * Jonathan Dowland [2016-06-24 09:24 +0100]: > > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:10:50PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > > I am pleased to announce the availability of neomutt [0] packages for > > > Debian. Hints for installation you'll find at

Re: Keysigning via Video Conferencing

2016-06-24 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Jakub Wilk dijo [Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 07:30:42PM +0200]: > * Nikolaus Rath , 2016-06-23, 09:23: > >I am wondering if the extra burden is worth the gain in security. If > >everyone were to follow this procedure then the bar to becoming a Debian > >developer would be raised significantly. > > As as

Re: Keysigning via Video Conferencing

2016-06-24 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Jonas Smedegaard dijo [Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:30:21PM +0200]: > I sign keys by a similar policy as Gunnar, it seems. But I do sign also > people I have not met before... > > The logic I use is that I should be able to re-identify later. If I > meet the person later I might have forgotten thei

Bug#828099: ITP: apertium-urd -- Apertium single language data for Urdu

2016-06-24 Thread Kartik Mistry
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Kartik Mistry * Package name: apertium-urd Version : 0.1.0 Upstream Author : Francis M. Tyers , Kevin Brubeck Unhammer , Sudarsh Rathi * URL : http://www.apertium.org/ * License :

Bug#828098: ITP: apertium-hin -- Apertium single language data for Hindi

2016-06-24 Thread Kartik Mistry
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Kartik Mistry * Package name: apertium-hin Version : 0.1.0 Upstream Author : Francis M. Tyers , Kevin Brubeck Unhammer , Sudarsh Rathi , Raveesh Motlani * URL : http://

Bug#828100: ITP: apertium-tat -- Apertium single language data for Tatar

2016-06-24 Thread Kartik Mistry
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Kartik Mistry * Package name: apertium-tat Version : 0.1.0 Upstream Author : Röstäm Battal, Francis M. Tyers , Ilnar Salimzyan , Jonathan N. Washington , Aglimza

Bug#828101: ITP: apertium-kaz -- Apertium single language data for Kazakh

2016-06-24 Thread Kartik Mistry
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Kartik Mistry * Package name: apertium-kaz Version : 0.1.0 Upstream Author : Nathan Maxson, Francis M. Tyers , Jonathan N. Washington , Ilnar Salimzyan , Aizhan

Handling Multi-Arch packages that must be installed for every enabled architecture?

2016-06-24 Thread Josh Triplett
Some packages, if installed on any architecture, must be installed for every enabled architecture. Most notably, an NSS or PAM module package, if enabled in /etc/nsswitch.conf or /etc/pam.d respectively, must exist for every enabled architecture to avoid breaking programs for that architecture. A