hi On 06/24/2016 05:32 PM, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:59:00PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: >> * Holger Levsen <hol...@layer-acht.org>, 2016-06-24, 09:05: >>>> I am suggesting that I remember what happened with mutt-kz. >>> I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to say >>> that I think the name "mutt-kz" is a NO-GO. I know it's from the authors >>> initials, but… to me it sounds like "mutt-hitler" or probably worse. >> >> Send complaints to Karel's parents... >> >> Every other two-letter sequence is going to mean something dreadful in some >> language. For example, millions[0] of Poles are offended when you talk about >> UBSan[1], or MO[2] files, or the .SS macro. > > These, like mutt-kz, are pure coincidences. For the original argument to > hold any water, you'd need to find an _intentional_ example. no you don't. you can also be thoughtful of the feelings of users if its just a coincidence. see for example the discussion about the file ending 'bro' https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366559#c157
cheers, -- muri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature