Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ryan Finnie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: grub-finnix
Version : 107
Upstream Author : N/A, native package
* URL : N/A, native package
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Shell (dash-comp
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 03:10:04PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Can I also just add the above Debian repo, do --add-architecture,
> and start replacing some packages? How can I for example, replace
> perl, on a running server?
I would guess that using --add-architecture is a recipe for disaster
On Nov 20, Ryan Finnie wrote:
> Description : Build a Finnix bootloader stanza on GRUB 2 systems
I think that you should add one or two lines to explain what Finnix is.
At least, the word "rescue" would help a lot...
> Note that there are certain restrictions regarding where the ISO may b
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 01:25:38PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> "The core components are always built (which includes systemd itself, as
> well as udevd and journald).
>
> For some uses the configure switches do not provide sufficient modularity.
> For example, they cannot be used to bu
Can you please remove me from this mailing list.
I've un-subscribed a number of times but I'm still receiving them.
Thanks
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 02:15:50 -,
wrote:
Content-Type: text/plain
debian-devel-digest Digest Volume 2012 : Issue 1225
Today's Topics
On 11/20/2012 01:21 AM, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> Description : Build a Finnix bootloader stanza on GRUB 2 systems
> I think that you should add one or two lines to explain what Finnix is.
> At least, the word "rescue" would help a lot...
Good idea; looking back, I was writing the description f
"Source-only uploads are not allowed."
Why not? May I request a binNMU for the architecture (amd64) I upload?
I currently do not have facilities to build the package in question
with the host running Debian's kernel.
For the package in question it is important to build in the same
environment as t
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:10:37AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> "Source-only uploads are not allowed."
> Why not? May I request a binNMU for the architecture (amd64) I upload?
>
> I currently do not have facilities to build the package in question
> with the host running Debian's kernel.
> For
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Edmondson
* Package name: ocproxy
Version : 0.9
Upstream Author : David Edmondson
* URL : http://dme.org/ocproxy
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : lwip based proxy for openconnect
ocproxy i
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:10:37AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> I currently do not have facilities to build the package in question
> with the host running Debian's kernel.
So how can you prove that the package builds?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Hi everybody,
virtual-package-list.txt.gz [1] says:
1. Post to debian-devel saying what names you intend to use or what
other changes you wish to make, and file a wish list bug against the
package debian-policy.
So, here is my proposal:
--- debian-policy-3.9.4.0/virtual-package-n
On 20 November 2012 11:14, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:10:37AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> "Source-only uploads are not allowed."
>> Why not? May I request a binNMU for the architecture (amd64) I upload?
>>
>> I currently do not have facilities to build the package
+++ Helmut Grohne [2012-11-20 09:38 +0100]:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 03:10:04PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > Can I also just add the above Debian repo, do --add-architecture,
> > and start replacing some packages? How can I for example, replace
> > perl, on a running server?
>
> I would guess
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> I am sorry, if I was not clear. I am aware of the "last iteration",
> but I am not enquiring about the default policy within debian as to
> how we should upload by default.
> I am asking why, when I had a reason to do so, was not able to do a
> source-
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:08:13PM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> If it's a policy enforcement, I am ok with it. Otherwise, I'd would
> like to see dak accept those. I have a vague recollection of a UDD
> presentations which did list count of DDs doing source-only uploads.
source+all uploads prob
On 20 November 2012 11:45, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:10:37AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> I currently do not have facilities to build the package in question
>> with the host running Debian's kernel.
>
> So how can you prove that the package builds?
>
I can give you my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 20/11/2012 13:37, Dmitrijs Ledkovs a écrit :
> On 20 November 2012 11:45, Jon Dowland wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:10:37AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
>> wrote:
>>> I currently do not have facilities to build the package in
>>> question with
On 20 November 2012 13:03, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Le 20/11/2012 13:37, Dmitrijs Ledkovs a écrit :
>> On 20 November 2012 11:45, Jon Dowland wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:10:37AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
>>> wrote:
I currently do
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 12:37 +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> On 20 November 2012 11:45, Jon Dowland wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:10:37AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> >> I currently do not have facilities to build the package in question
> >> with the host running Debian's kernel.
> >
On 20 November 2012 13:47, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 12:37 +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> On 20 November 2012 11:45, Jon Dowland wrote:
>> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:10:37AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> >> I currently do not have facilities to build the package in que
also sprach Thibaut Paumard [2012.11.20.1403 +0100]:
> That's why we currently require a binary together with the source. It
> tautologically proves that you successfully built it.
Nope, it does not. It could also prove that you know how to use
changestool to engineer a .changes file combining a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Olivier Langella
* Package name: tandem-mass
Version : 20121001
Upstream Author : The Global Proteome Machine Organization
* URL : http://www.thegpm.org/TANDEM/
* License : Artistic License 1.0
Programming Lang: C++
Alessio Treglia writes ("New virtual packages: lv2-plugin and lv2-host"):
> virtual-package-list.txt.gz [1] says:
>
>1. Post to debian-devel saying what names you intend to use or what
> other changes you wish to make, and file a wish list bug against the
> package debian-policy.
>
Dmitrijs,
am Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 02:03:52PM + hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> To be clear both at build time & run time. So why the mipsel buildd
> above is running a much newer kernel, since this can be leak into the
> build packages...? Or is it a new port for wheezy or something? (e.g.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 20/11/2012 14:35, Dmitrijs Ledkovs a écrit :
> What's this: lucatelli Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-0.bpo.3-octeon
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=llvm-3.2&ver=3.2~rc1-1~exp3&arch=mips&stamp=1353416035
>
> Why is distribution (experiment
On 20 November 2012 14:28, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Dmitrijs,
>
> am Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 02:03:52PM + hast du folgendes geschrieben:
>> To be clear both at build time & run time. So why the mipsel buildd
>> above is running a much newer kernel, since this can be leak into the
>> build packages..
On 20 November 2012 14:42, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Le 20/11/2012 14:35, Dmitrijs Ledkovs a écrit :
>
>> What's this: lucatelli Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-0.bpo.3-octeon
>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=llvm-3.2&ver=3.2~rc1-1~exp3&arc
Sorry to be a bit late there :)
Am 21.09.2012 16:41, schrieb Jon Dowland:
That's not really of any interest to -devel, and I guess you're quoting
info from private mail here. Please let's keep this list useful.
I disagree. It was very useful to get a glimpse on why he had / has so
many issues w
Hi there!
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:35:08 +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> I did built in sbuild, but not a VM. Is there pbuilder/sbuild backed
> by qemu/kvm available anywhere to make that easier to do?
There is, but I doubt the built package will be accepted, we already had
this problem in the pas
+++ Daniel Schepler [2012-11-20 07:51 -0800]:
> Once upon a time, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > Can I also just add the above Debian repo, do --add-architecture,
> > and start replacing some packages? How can I for example, replace
> > perl, on a running server?
>
> That should work, as long as you ma
Am 05.11.2012 00:41, schrieb Andrew Kolotenko:
On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 02:57 +0400, Виталий Короневич wrote:
debian gnome-edition - ok
debian kde-edition - ok
debian lxde-edition - ok
debian xfce-edition - ok
when will debian mate-edition?
what for? the ones above are enough imho
For you maybe, f
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Cédric Boutillier"
* Package name: impress.js
Version : 0.5.3
Upstream Author : Bartek Szopka
* URL : https://github.com/bartaz/impress.js
* License : Expat or GPL-2+
Programming Lang: JavaScript
Description : Ja
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 04:37:20PM +, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Daniel Schepler [2012-11-20 07:51 -0800]:
> > Once upon a time, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > > Can I also just add the above Debian repo, do --add-architecture,
> > > and start replacing some packages? How can I for example, replace
> > > p
Am 05.11.2012 00:41, schrieb Wouter Verhelst:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 02:57:35AM +0400, Виталий Короневич wrote:
debian gnome-edition - ok
debian kde-edition - ok
debian lxde-edition - ok
debian xfce-edition - ok
when will debian mate-edition?
When someone (you?) does the work to package (the r
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Later I'll try to document this a bit more on the wiki, [snip]
OK, I've now created http://wiki.debian.org/X32Port .
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
On 20 November 2012 16:12, Luca Capello wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:35:08 +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> I did built in sbuild, but not a VM. Is there pbuilder/sbuild backed
>> by qemu/kvm available anywhere to make that easier to do?
>
> There is, but I doubt the built packag
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Cédric Boutillier"
* Package name: highlight.js
Version : 7.3
Upstream Author : Ivan Sagalaev
* URL : http://softwaremaniacs.org/soft/highlight/en/
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: JavaScript
Description
Am 05.11.2012 00:51, schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 02:57:35AM +0400, Виталий Короневич wrote:
debian gnome-edition - ok
debian kde-edition - ok
debian lxde-edition - ok
debian xfce-edition - ok
Those aren't really editions comparable to Ubuntu's editions or
Fedora's
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:13:28 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>There is no reason for kFreeBSD and Hurd to stop Debian's Linux ports
>from using systemd or upstart by default once wheezy is released. We
>can keep sysvinit/openrc/busybox init/etc for kFreeBSD, Hurd and users
>who need or prefer them.
Aren'
Hi!
2012/11/20 Marc Haber :
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:13:28 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>>[...]
> Aren't the systemd makers trying hard to move existing functionality
> from udev, consolekit, policykit and syslogd into systemd, effectively
> making those unavailable for non-Linux?
No, not really... Co
Le mardi 20 novembre 2012 à 18:37 +0100, Michael Schmitt a écrit :
> > One of the biggest problems with MATE so far is that it currently
> > depends on libraries and other things that have been deprecated and
> > removed in Debian and should not be reintroduced to Debian.
> Can we agree on somethi
Ben Hutchings decadent.org.uk> writes:
> 64-bit architecture that supports a 32-bit userland. I think the only
> interesting difference is that x32 has 64-bit time_t.
And double the GPRs (General Purpose Registers), and each of them
in double the width. I expect this to help modern compilers a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alastair McKinstry
* Package name: python-iapws
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : jjgomera
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/iapws
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Python implementation o
Dmitrijs Ledkovs debian.org> writes:
> Gzip is ok, but many packages these days use xz -9 --extreme deb
xz is fine but -9 is abuse of the flexibility…
maybe I should export XZ_DEFAULTS=--memlimit=150MiB
in my build chroots… hmm… something to think about…
(for m68k, I might actually use less, set
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alastair McKinstry
* Package name: flextra
Version : 5.0
Upstream Author : Andreas Stohl
* URL : http://transport.nilu.no/flexpart
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Fortran
Description : Trajectory model for traci
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alastair McKinstry
* Package name: flexpart
Version : 90.02
Upstream Author : Andreas Stohl
* URL : http://transport.nilu.no/flexpart
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Fortran
Description : Particle Dispersion mod
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alastair McKinstry
* Package name: metview
Version : 4.3.4
Upstream Author : ECMWF http://www.ecmwf.int
* URL : https://software.ecmwf.int/wiki/display/METV/Home
* License : Apache
Programming Lang: C++
Description
Johannes Schauer dixit:
>If you were ever involved in porting Debian to a new architecture or
>know how a port was done, please do not hesitate to either write me an
For reviving m68k:
> - did you cross compile parts of Debian? How much? How hard was it?
Only to test kernels and a few userspace
Am 20.11.2012 20:12, schrieb Josselin Mouette:
Le mardi 20 novembre 2012 à 18:37 +0100, Michael Schmitt a écrit :
One of the biggest problems with MATE so far is that it currently
depends on libraries and other things that have been deprecated and
removed in Debian and should not be reintroduced
> Me too, please read:
> http://catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Oh crap, my apologies.
I honestly forgot that the reply was still at the bottom of my email.
I did not intentionally leave it there.
It certainly wasn't some passive-aggressive kind of post-reply, I do
apologize for it being t
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 06:37:48PM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> And whatever they or anybody else does in that regard, it will come
> to late for wheezy.
All of MATE will come too late for Wheezy. It's already too late for
Wheezy.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian
Am 20.11.2012 23:07, schrieb Jon Dowland:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 06:37:48PM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
And whatever they or anybody else does in that regard, it will come
to late for wheezy.
All of MATE will come too late for Wheezy. It's already too late for
Wheezy.
That may be common thin
On 20/11/12 22:55, Michael Schmitt wrote:
>
> If one likes Gnome2.x or MATE or not is a question of taste, to
> acknowledge that many users are just mad about Gnome3 is a fact. To
> offer no real sane upgrade-path for those users is... dunno how to say
> it in another way, it is just insane! I did
Michael Schmitt writes:
> That may be common thinking, agreed. But I am that extremely worried
> about the current upgrade solution in wheezy, sorry... I think Debian
> should try to get it in.
We are way, way too late in the release process for something that
substantial. There are other alter
Le mardi 20 novembre 2012 à 23:14 +0100, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez a
écrit :
> What bothers me is that gnome3-classic will be deprecated with the next
> release of GNOME. I hope that MATE can make into Debian for Jessie.
This is a problem that needs tackling for jessie one way or another.
This m
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 09:22:40PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> For reviving m68k:
Thanks for your detailed explanations! I added a summary of it to the
m68k section of the wiki page [1], extending the notes entered there by
Ingo Jürgensmann. Thanks to both of you!
> > - how did you go ab
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 19:48:25 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Dmitrijs Ledkovs debian.org> writes:
> > Gzip is ok, but many packages these days use xz -9 --extreme deb
>
> xz is fine but -9 is abuse of the flexibility…
> maybe I should export XZ_DEFAULTS=--memlimit=150MiB
> in my build chroots…
On Sat, 2012-11-10 at 13:52:22 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 07:48:22PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Okay. I did some tests with various packages. From binary only to text
> only.
Thanks for the tests Bastian. It would still be nice to see a bigger
sample, if the tests on
On 20.11.2012 22:27, Russ Allbery wrote:
Michael Schmitt writes:
That may be common thinking, agreed. But I am that extremely worried
about the current upgrade solution in wheezy, sorry... I think
Debian
should try to get it in.
We are way, way too late in the release process for something
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 15:10:04 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Daniel wrote:
> > wget http://87.98.215.228/debian/dists/archive.pub
> > debootstrap --arch=x32 --components=main,byhand,partial \
> > --keyring=`pwd`/archive.pub \
> > sid /root/x32-chroot/ http://87.98.215.228/debian/
>
> Can I also
On 20 November 2012 23:21, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-11-10 at 13:52:22 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 07:48:22PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
>> Okay. I did some tests with various packages. From binary only to text
>> only.
>
> Thanks for the tests Bastian. It wou
Hi Ian,
thanks for the quick reply!
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Ian Jackson
wrote:
> An lv2-plugin could be almost anything AFAICT, so depending on "some
> LV2 plugin" is not very useful.
>
> And an lv2-host could include something which can use only plugins
> with certain features.
Altoug
Hi Russ,
as I see you, as a member of ctte, are kind of in favour of MATE for
jessie and not wheezy... :(
Am 20.11.2012 23:27, schrieb Russ Allbery:
Michael Schmitt writes:
That may be common thinking, agreed. But I am that extremely worried
about the current upgrade solution in wheezy, so
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Bremner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: pixz
Version : 0.0.0+git$something
Upstream Author : Dave Vasilevsky
* URL : https://github.com/vasi/pixz
* License : BSD 2-clause
Programmi
Michael Schmitt writes:
> as I see you, as a member of ctte, are kind of in favour of MATE for
> jessie and not wheezy... :(
I have no opinion on MATE. I personally switched from GNOME 2 to Xfce on
the one system where I use an integrated desktop when gnome-shell wouldn't
run due to the age of
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:20:11PM -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> * Package name: pixz
> So why another parallel xz in the archive.
>
> - - This one seems about 25% faster compressing in some simple tests I
> ran (compressing a 2.7G file with 6 threads, maximum compression).
You mean, 25% f
Am 20.11.2012 23:14, schrieb Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez:
On 20/11/12 22:55, Michael Schmitt wrote:
If one likes Gnome2.x or MATE or not is a question of taste, to
acknowledge that many users are just mad about Gnome3 is a fact. To
offer no real sane upgrade-path for those users is... dunno how t
Hi Michael,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Am 20.11.2012 23:14, schrieb Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez:
>
>> On 20/11/12 22:55, Michael Schmitt wrote:
>>>
>>> If one likes Gnome2.x or MATE or not is a question of taste, to
>>> acknowledge that many users are just mad about
On 2012-11-14 22:02, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are considering removing the following packages from testing as
> they have unfixed RC bugs filed against them. [...]
>
ferm, apt-2p2 and mediawiki-math has been fixed in sid and by the looks
of it all of them are already unblocked.
> Should
69 matches
Mail list logo
