On 20 November 2012 11:14, Andrey Rahmatullin <w...@wrar.name> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:10:37AM +0000, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: >> "Source-only uploads are not allowed." >> Why not? May I request a binNMU for the architecture (amd64) I upload? >> >> I currently do not have facilities to build the package in question >> with the host running Debian's kernel. >> For the package in question it is important to build in the same >> environment as the rest of the packages in the distribution. >> The sole purpose of the package is to gather as much detail about the >> environment as possible, which has been proven to be highly valuable >> for security analysis and fixing highly strict test-suites. > The last iteration of this was started at > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/10/msg00296.html >
I am sorry, if I was not clear. I am aware of the "last iteration", but I am not enquiring about the default policy within debian as to how we should upload by default. I am asking why, when I had a reason to do so, was not able to do a source-only upload. Is this a feature of dak, or a policy enforcement? If it's a policy enforcement, I am ok with it. Otherwise, I'd would like to see dak accept those. I have a vague recollection of a UDD presentations which did list count of DDs doing source-only uploads. Regards, Dmitrijs. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/canbhlujhme6yf+xsjorlkj_xtf62s6xehew8f+zehojpktk...@mail.gmail.com
