On 20 November 2012 14:42, Thibaut Paumard <thib...@debian.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Le 20/11/2012 14:35, Dmitrijs Ledkovs a écrit :
>
>> What's this: lucatelli Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-0.bpo.3-octeon
>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=llvm-3.2&ver=3.2~rc1-1~exp3&arch=mips&stamp=1353416035
>>
>>  Why is distribution (experimental) building on an out of date
>> backported kernel?
>>
>
> The buildd hosts are production machines, they're not guaranteed or
> even supposed to run SID (packages are built in chroots).
>
> When your package fails to build due to a *buggy* kernel, you can
> request for an upgrade on this buildd.
>
> Why does the running kernel matter for procenv build? Does procenv run
> on another kernel than that of the machine it was built on?
>

Well the code in it's current form was discovered to rely on newer
kernel features.
Now I am trying to establish a baseline that could be reasonably
relied upon and I have passed these details to upstream now.
Currently it builts fine, but fails to run on an older kernel,
upstream is working on fixing this runtime error.

Regards,

Dmitrijs.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/canbhluihcgbvo_rczzwrqg0w5ktvjhrjqrzfr4utwg7o9k4...@mail.gmail.com

Reply via email to