Hi,
(if unsure please CC me on replies, I'm not subscribed to -legal)
due to demand by a coworker I've taken #625611 and started to prepare
a package for the exFAT fuse driver and the utils package.
Currently I hesitate to upload it and place the package on Debian
infrastructure (as in moving it
Enrico Weigelt, 2011-12-30 06:21+0100:
> Which packages ship files in /var ?
Many install directories there. And one of my packages, dokuwiki, also
installs files under /var/lib/dokuwiki/lib/{plugins,tpl}. These files
define the default set of bundled plugins and templates, and I install
them ther
Hello,
Currently in unstable there are around 30 packages which depend on
Tcl/Tk 8.4, which is quite old itself despite the fact that updates are
still released for it. Tcl/Tk 8.5 is available for more than 4 years,
Tcl/Tk 8.6 is coming soon, so I think it may be the time to deprecate
Tcl/Tk 8.4 f
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 05:36:40PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
top-level directories would look after a move from / to /usr. Also, the
FHS says nothing about the current approach of overriding files in /usr
with files in /etc, which allows packages to stop shipping configuration
files in /etc th
Hello,
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:43:29 +0300
Andrew Shadura wrote:
> So I'd like the maintainers of the packages which still depend on
> Tcl/Tk 8.4 to update their packages to build against/use newer Tcl/Tk
> versions.
Also, I'd like to ask, that if possible, try to fix change the packages
so they
On Dec 30, Stephan Seitz wrote:
> Every package which will accept a configuration file in /etc should
> ship such a file in /etc, even if it contains only comments. In this
This train has already passed and you lost it, sorry.
> And where do you want to put the package information which are
> cu
hi folks,
I want to join a group in wnpp list to test my self helping
developing so i can start slowly.
How can i do that?
best regards
gnugr
--
On Dec 30, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> due to demand by a coworker I've taken #625611 and started to prepare
> a package for the exFAT fuse driver and the utils package.
Debian, as policy, ignores patents which are not being actively and
widely enforced.
So feel free to upload.
--
ciao,
Marco
sign
On 30/12/11 12:48, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Dec 30, Stephan Seitz wrote:
>
>> > Every package which will accept a configuration file in /etc should
>> > ship such a file in /etc, even if it contains only comments. In this
> This train has already passed and you lost it, sorry.
>
I think that st
On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 16:56 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Package: iw
> Version: 0.9.19-1
> Severity: important
> Justification: policy §2.5
>
> aircrack-ng depends on iw, but the former is optional and the latter of
> priority "extra". Please bump up the priority of iw to optional to
> match.
You may want to take a look at the Community Distribution Patent
Policy FAQ, prepared for Debian by the SFLC:
http://www.debian.org/reports/patent-faq
IIRC the DPL is working on more patent related stuff too.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-de
On Dec 30, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> I think that stephan is right here. Every package using files in /etc
It DOES NOT MATTER who is right, some upstreams have decided otherwise.
At least udev, systemd and next month module-init-tools do override the
configuration files in /usr/lib/ wi
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 02:47:38PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Dec 30, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>
> > I think that stephan is right here. Every package using files in /etc
> It DOES NOT MATTER who is right, some upstreams have decided otherwise.
> At least udev, systemd and next mont
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez, 2011-12-30 14:22+0100:
> I think that stephan is right here. Every package using files in /etc
> should ship this files in the package in order to let the admin know
> what package each file belongs to. Its very ugly to do a "dpkg -S
> /etc/xxx" and get a no path found.
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 02:00:23PM +, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
> I think having the default configuration values written in a default
> configuration file under /usr is better than having them harcoded, since
> it makes it really easier to determine what these defaults are.
It's problematic if the
Hi
On Friday 30 December 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 16:56 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > Package: iw
> > Version: 0.9.19-1
> > Severity: important
> > Justification: policy §2.5
> >
> > aircrack-ng depends on iw, but the former is optional and the latter of
> > priority
On Fri, 2011-12-30 at 15:16 +0100, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Friday 30 December 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 16:56 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > > Package: iw
> > > Version: 0.9.19-1
> > > Severity: important
> > > Justification: policy §2.5
> > >
> >
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 16:56 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > Package: iw
> > Version: 0.9.19-1
> > Severity: important
> > Justification: policy §2.5
> >
> > aircrack-ng depends on iw, but the former is optional and the latter of
> > priority "extra". Please bump up the pr
Stephan Seitz wrote:
> Every package which will accept a configuration file in /etc should ship
> such a file in /etc, even if it contains only comments. In this way, you
> know the name(s) of the configuration file(s) and the subdirectory in
> /etc where they belong.
A de-facto standard has alrea
Hi
On Friday 30 December 2011, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 16:56 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > > Package: iw
> > > Version: 0.9.19-1
> > > Severity: important
> > > Justification: policy §2.5
> > >
> > > aircrack-ng depends on iw, but the former is op
Josh Triplett, 2011-12-30 16:09+0100:
> A de-facto standard has already emerged for how to ship the standard
> configuration in /usr/lib and handle overrides,
I do not think this is a de facto standard at all yet. What pieces of
software use apply it? The length of that list should be compared to
On Fri, 2011-12-30 at 06:56 -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 16:56 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > > Package: iw
> > > Version: 0.9.19-1
> > > Severity: important
> > > Justification: policy §2.5
> > >
> > > aircrack-ng depends on iw, but the former is
On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 00:09 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 28 novembre 2011 19:56 +0100, Svante Signell a crit :
> > As many people (including me) are very disappointed in gnome3, switching
> > from a very configurable desktop environment in gnome2 to a almost not
> > configurable tabl
On 12/30/2011 07:20 PM, Svante Signell wrote:
> I'm very reluctant to upgrade to gnome3, I have it on one box, and
> don't like it. I want workspaces related to different tasks, like
> programming, web browsing, watching a video, listening to music, etc.
> That could involve e.g. having terminals,
Le vendredi 30 décembre 2011 à 19:20 +0100, Svante Signell a écrit :
> I'm very reluctant to upgrade to gnome3, I have it on one box, and
> don't like it. I want workspaces related to different tasks, like
> programming, web browsing, watching a video, listening to music, etc.
> That could involve
> Josh Triplett, 2011-12-30 16:09+0100:
> > A de-facto standard has already emerged for how to ship the standard
> > configuration in /usr/lib and handle overrides,
>
> I do not think this is a de facto standard at all yet. What pieces of
> software use apply it? The length of that list should be
Hi to all, is anyone interested in evaristo?
Evaristo is an ERP solution written in Java (2 tier), though only
available in Portuguese, since version 4 is fully internationalizable.
It requires a PostgreSQL database in order to store the data.
DGCI certification is required for the use in commerci
The free GPL licensed version could be included in the repos, what do you think?
http://sourceforge.net/projects/evaristo/
On 31/12/2011, 810d4rk <810d...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi to all, is anyone interested in evaristo?
>
> Evaristo is an ERP solution written in Java (2 tier), though only
> avail
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 00:51:18 +
810d4rk <810d...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi to all, is anyone interested in evaristo?
>
If you're interested in packaging evaristo for Debian you should have a
look at http://wiki.debian.org/HowToPackageForDebian and file an ITP
(Intent To Package) [0].
If you do
* Tanguy Ortolo schrieb:
> I think having the default configuration values written in a default
> configuration file under /usr is better than having them harcoded, since
> it makes it really easier to determine what these defaults are. But not
> shipping the user configuration file, I do not kno
* Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez schrieb:
> I think that stephan is right here. Every package using files in /etc
> should ship this files in the package in order to let the admin know
> what package each file belongs to. Its very ugly to do a "dpkg -S
> /etc/xxx" and get a no path found.
>
> If som
* Tanguy Ortolo schrieb:
> Enrico Weigelt, 2011-12-30 06:21+0100:
> > Which packages ship files in /var ?
>
> Many install directories there. And one of my packages, dokuwiki, also
> installs files under /var/lib/dokuwiki/lib/{plugins,tpl}. These files
> define the default set of bundled plugins
* Adam Borowski schrieb:
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 02:47:38PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Dec 30, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> >
> > > I think that stephan is right here. Every package using files in /etc
> > It DOES NOT MATTER who is right, some upstreams have decided otherwise.
>
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Tanguy Ortolo schrieb:
> > I think having the default configuration values written in a default
> > configuration file under /usr is better than having them harcoded, since
> > it makes it really easier to determine what these defaults are. But not
> > shipping the user c
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 12:59 AM, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Adam Borowski schrieb:
>> On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 02:47:38PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> > On Dec 30, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> >
>> > > I think that stephan is right here. Every package using files in /etc
>> > It DOES NOT
Josh Triplett writes:
> Enrico Weigelt wrote:
>> I have a general objection against putting (default) configs outside
>> /etc at all. The main problem is, on updates, defaults might silently
>> change, without operators used to look at /etc and comparing current
>> config with new defaults.
> By
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Adam Borowski schrieb:
> > On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 02:47:38PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > On Dec 30, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think that stephan is right here. Every package using files in /etc
> > > It DOES NOT MATTER who is right, some up
Fernando Lemos writes:
> Enrico Weigelt wrote:
>> ACK. Sometimes upstreams doing really stange things (maybe because they
>> dont have any package management in mind), that should be fixed. If
>> upstream doesnt do those fixes, distros have to catch in.
Sometimes, I think Red Hat makes some of
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joseph Nahmias
* Package name: edgar
Version : 0.94
Upstream Author : Richard Sweeney
* URL : http://www.parallelrealities.co.uk/p/legend-of-edgar.html
* License : GPL2+
Programming Lang: C
Description : The Lege
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 7:45 PM, vangelis wrote:
> I want to join a group in wnpp list to test my self helping developing so i
> can start slowly.
> How can i do that?
I'm not sure how to answer your question, but maybe one of these links helps:
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
http://wnpp.deb
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> Currently in unstable there are around 30 packages which depend on
> Tcl/Tk 8.4, which is quite old itself despite the fact that updates are
> still released for it. Tcl/Tk 8.5 is available for more than 4 years,
> Tcl/Tk 8.6 is coming soon
41 matches
Mail list logo
