Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 308495 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308495: general: pmud does not turn off display
Changed Bug submitter from "Jeffrey B. Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 04:40:11PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> What does the default Debian install do?
Debian seems to use ext3 without directory indexing by default.
Which is a sane choice as directory indexing on ext3 still seems to
be not fully mature.
And as mentioned in another thre
Ed Cogburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sunday 08 May 2005 4:23pm, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Ed Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > On Sunday 08 May 2005 09:27, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>> >> On 10283 March 1977, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
>> >> >> Whats going on == someone needs to check it.
Now, it's finally possible for you to enlarge your penis
http://www.tullam.info/ss/
Expand your Penis 20% Larger in weeks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 05:50, Goswin von Brederlow
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wednesday 11 May 2005 01:28, Goswin von Brederlow
> >
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > Why would it be desirable to have arch-os directories under libexec?
> >
>
Hi Torsten,
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 12:09:15AM +0200, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> > I don't know which package I should file this bug against, but since the
> > upgrade
> > of the openldap2-packages I'm seeing these errors quite frequently:
> >
> > chown:
> > /home/roland/deb
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 08:55:28PM +, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> Howdy,
>
> Francesco Paolo Lovergine debian.org> writes:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: "Francesco P. Lovergine" debian.org>
> >
> > * Package name: gstat
> > Version : 2.4.4
> > Upstrea
Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wednesday 11 May 2005 05:50, Goswin von Brederlow
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > On Wednesday 11 May 2005 01:28, Goswin von Brederlow
>> >
>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> > Why would it be desirab
Hi everybody,
I'm only have a doubt, if someone make a mirror of the official debian
(including non-free) and all that packages are ditributed is in danger
to being sued?
Accordingly with Goswin that's nothing about complain, only the main
server of the distribution don't have non-free, the main
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ed Cogburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yea, like annoying users by leaving non-free behind just because you're still
> mad that the DDs voted to keep it. Sure.
I *am* an AMD64 user, and I can completely understand *why* they are
being cautious.
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 12:28:29AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> On 5/10/05, Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In the past, UW has (in my opinion) played deliberate word games to
> > retroactively revoke the Freeness of a prior Pine license, and this license
> > is clearly non-free *withou
* Ed Cogburn
| We ARE Debian for Heaven's sake!
I can't see that you've done anything at all for the AMD64 port, nor
are you a DD. Please go troll somewhere else.
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who i
#include
I do not get any answers from the maintainer of apt-cacher (Jonathan
Oxer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) without any obvious reason, he has been
responding few weeks ago.
Looking at the outstanding bug reports for apt-cacher, I decide to
hijack the package, where I rewrote the major parts (it's D
* Juergen Salk
| Among some other things, FHS version 2.3 provides a /srv hierarchy
| to pick up at least some of the non-library contents that is
| currently living below /usr/lib (e.g. CGI-Scripts)[4].
FHS 2.3 is utterly unusable wrt /srv for packagers since it's the
local admin's domain. No
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:00:48PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 10:42:43PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 May 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > >How often does a quick NMU that gives a fast improvement in the RC
> > >bugs metric hide the real problem that the maintaine
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 12:28:29AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> Also, if I recall correctly, there was a gnu project to write a pine
> replacement, but I don't know where that stands. Probably it's
> not complete because of a lack of development effort.
Well, there's nano -- and if you want the pi
* Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-11 10:55]:
> I do not get any answers from the maintainer of apt-cacher (Jonathan
> Oxer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) without any obvious reason, he has been
> responding few weeks ago.
...
> If anyone has contact with Jonathan, please tell him to contact me.
Jo
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 09:50:48AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:00:48PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 10:42:43PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > On Tue, 10 May 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > >How often does a quick NMU that gives a fast improv
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: cenon-doc
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author :
* URL : http://gnustep.made-it.com/Guides/GNUmail.html
* License : Read on at the bottom*
Description : User guide for GNUMail
This package is an illustrated user gu
Hi,
how important is it to have unzoo, now that zoo is in main?
unzoo is only able to list and extract files, not to add new ones.
Thomas
--
+++ Lassen Sie Ihren Gedanken freien Lauf... z.B. per FreeSMS +++
GMX bietet bis zu 100 FreeSMS/Monat: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/mail
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On 10 May 2005, at 1:05 am, Paul Brossier wrote:
Hi all,
I am looking at ways to distribute batch jobs on various hosts.
Essentially, i have N different command lines, and M different
hosts to run them on:
foo -i file1.data -p 0.1
foo -i file2.data -p 0.1
foo -i file3.data -
Hello people!
I uploaded fist pitfdll package to http://mentors.debian.net/ Feel free
to check it out and report any problems with it. The source package name
is "pitfdll", the resulting binary package is "gstreamer0.8-pitfdll".
And don't forget to read the README.Debian.
PS Looking for sponsor
#include
* Martin Michlmayr [Wed, May 11 2005, 10:45:47AM]:
> * Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-11 10:55]:
> > I do not get any answers from the maintainer of apt-cacher (Jonathan
> > Oxer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) without any obvious reason, he has been
> > responding few weeks ago.
> ...
>
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, May 10, 2005 at
* Andreas Barth
| Agreed. We should IMHO make such a requirement to be part of etchs
| release policy.
How are you going to solve the problem ia32-libs solves if not in this
way?
(Unless we want to make etch fully multiarchified, which I don't think
we will.)
--
Tollef Fog Heen
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 09:03:19PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> > polyxmass-doc
>
> That's the documentation for binaries that _are_ in sid; it was a few
> days late for sarge. I find this to be quite sucky, that Debian ships
> the program, but not the documentation.
>
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 03:50:29PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Andreas Barth
>
> | Agreed. We should IMHO make such a requirement to be part of etchs
> | release policy.
>
> How are you going to solve the problem ia32-libs solves if not in this
> way?
>
> (Unless we want to make etch full
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Humberto Massa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
with the possible exception of FAT and Minix. Q: are they used by a
default? A: Last time I installed Debian (15 days ago), it asked me if
I wanted my partition ext3, xfs, or reiserfs IIRC; I chose reiserfs,
and I am pretty su
[Humberto Massa]
> > It had equated the two of them in the first part of the phrase.
[Raul Miller]
> The GPL did not use the word "equals".
> Neither "that is to say" nor "namely" are equal to "equals".
Are we to understand that your argument hinges on such fine semantic
distinctions as claimi
Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 04:40:11PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> What does the default Debian install do?
>
> Debian seems to use ext3 without directory indexing by default.
> Which is a sane choice as directory indexing on ext3 still seems to
Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Would you agree that "that bug" should be fixed (in Etch), irrespective
> of whether the FHS is also changed to split /usr/lib?
I'm not expert enough on the other factors that might be relevant to
say.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 04:40:11PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
What does the default Debian install do?
Debian seems to use ext3 without directory indexing by default.
Which is a sane choice as directory i
[Raul Miller]
> However, I can present my point of view without resorting to this argument:
...
> Does that make sense?
Much clearer, thanks. I was annoyed by the increasingly fine
hair-splitting - thanks for bringing the level back to the realm of the
meaningful.
signature.asc
Description: Di
On 5/11/05, Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The GPL did not use the word "equals".
> > Neither "that is to say" nor "namely" are equal to "equals".
>
> Are we to understand that your argument hinges on such fine semantic
> distinctions as claiming that "that is to say" does not conn
Gunnar Wolf a écrit :
>
>
>It is not only that - It is because apt-get is an infrastructure
>manager, not an individual package manager. dpkg does work on single
>packages, but apt-get works on the whole collection - and it could
>lead to inconsistencies if you let apt-get do a half-assed job and
Humberto Massa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>
>>Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>
>>
>>>On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 04:40:11PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>>>
>>>
What does the default Debian install do?
>>>Debian seems to use ext3 with
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 17:21, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> BUt according to Christoph Hellwig, the ext3 which is the default is
> used without directory indexing, which returns you to O(n).
You have yet to present any numbers which show there is a problem here.
Can we please discuss real world
Will Newton wrote:
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 17:21, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
BUt according to Christoph Hellwig, the ext3 which is the default is
used without directory indexing, which returns you to O(n).
You have yet to present any numbers which show there is a problem here.
Can we pleas
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 17:35, Humberto Massa wrote:
> This is not an imaginary problem, after all, in principle.
>
> Let's see, as I wrote before, my installation has *thousands* of files
> in /usr/lib and, in some filesystems, this can add up to a very large
> time (and ab-use of dentry cache m
[Humberto Massa]
> As I said before, as far as I recall, the Debian installer suggested
> me only filesystems that have O(1) [O(log n) worst case] directory
> lookup. I chose reiserfs, but the installer IIRC suggested ext3 and
> xfs as alternatives.
As Christoph (I think) said, Debian creates ex
Le mercredi 11 mai 2005 à 13:35 -0300, Humberto Massa a écrit :
> Imagine that, to load Konqui, you have to go 200 times to the disk (ok,
> cache, but...), each of them reading the 1 entries I have in
> /usr/lib, some of them twice or three times, to follow the symlinks.
>
> This is a real i
Peter Samuelson wrote:
(...)
HOWEVER
This is a very silly thing to argue about without benchmarks. Those
who care about this - yes, Thomas, I mean you - should get numbers.
Here's how:
(steps 1-6)
You are 100% right and I stand corrected.
--
HTH,
Massa
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
On 5/11/05, Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[an argument, much of which would make sense in a parallel universe
where the GPL is on the law books as 17 USC 666]
I am not a lawyer (or a fortiori a judge), so all that I can do to
explain why this isn't valid legal reasoning is to point you at
On 5/11/05, Michael K. Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I'm not going to say that your point of view isn't perfectly valid
> as your own point of view; but I don't have any reason to believe that
> it's a good predictor of how a court case involving the FSF suing
> FooSoft for linking agains
Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 12:23 -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
>
>
>>Currently there are two packages that he maintains,
>>
>>
> Yup.
>
>
>
>>I would like to maintain mrtg since I do use it. As to the other
>>package, it probably should be orphaned.
>>
>>
> OK, please check
Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>Adam Majer dijo [Tue, May 10, 2005 at 12:23:10PM -0500]:
>
>
>>Currently there are two packages that he maintains,
>>
>>http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>*libnet**-easytcp-perl
>>**mrtg
>>
>>I would like to maintain mrtg since I do use it. As to the other
>>package, i
The upstream now includes docs for the GIT core, though still not for
Cogito. The docs are available in .txt and .html, and they _would_
be available as manpages except for a bug in asciidoc. The asciidoc
maintainer has been offered a patch.
You can grab the new cogito package here:
http:/
On 5/11/05, Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course, a court case does not have to be argued that way.
No, but if it's to have a prayer of winning, it has to be argued in
terms of the law that is actually applicable, not as if the court were
obliged to construe the GPL so that every wor
Bypass the Doctor & Get Drugs Now
http://www.s0o.net/p/coupon/marybmato
Hate recieving these msgs s0o.netu.php
Down these mean streets a man must go who is not himself mean, who is neither
tarnished nor afraid.
On 5/11/05, Michael K. Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/11/05, Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Of course, a court case does not have to be argued that way.
> No, but if it's to have a prayer of winning, it has to be argued in
> terms of the law that is actually applicable, not a
On Wed, 11 May 2005 03:33:41 -0400 Glenn Maynard wrote:
> I fully agree that we should cooperate with what copyright holders
> want, in general. What I remember, however, was that Pine was under a
> clearly Free license, and UW played word lawyer ("modify and
> distribute", was it?)
Yes, see for
On Wed, 11 May 2005 14:05:28 -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> The upstream now includes docs for the GIT core, though still not for
> Cogito. The docs are available in .txt and .html, and they _would_
> be available as manpages except for a bug in asciidoc. The asciidoc
> maintainer has been
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 09:36:39AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > What's the syntax for the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for adding a second
> > submitter?
>
> I believe
>
> submitter [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> works just fine.
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 12:39:04PM +0200, Thomas Schoepf wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Thomas,
> how important is it to have unzoo, now that zoo is in main?
> unzoo is only able to list and extract files, not to add new ones.
the functionality of unzoo is a subset of the functionality of zoo?
In this case a
Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 11 May 2005 14:05:28 -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> > You can grab the new cogito package here:
> >
> > http://highlab.com/~seb/debian
>
> FYI, you can make the packages and source apt-get'able w/ a script like
> http://www.acm.rpi.edu/~
This one time, at band camp, Adrian Bunk said:
> On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 12:39:04PM +0200, Thomas Schoepf wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> > how important is it to have unzoo, now that zoo is in main?
> > unzoo is only able to list and extract files, not to add new ones.
>
> the functionalit
Hi Eduard and Martin,
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 10:45 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-11 10:55]:
> > I do not get any answers from the maintainer of apt-cacher (Jonathan
> > Oxer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) without any obvious reason, he has been
> > responding fe
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, there's nano -- and if you want the pine UI, most people recommend
> mutt with a .muttrc that contains pine-style keybindings.
>
> At least that's what I used when switching from pine to mutt...
Does that actually offer the "pine experience" thou
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Adam M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: dhcpv6
Version : 0.10
Upstream Author : ?? Not a single one - many...
* URL : http://dhcpv6.sourceforge.net/
* License : Mostly BSD, some LGPL and MIT/X
Description : a s
Fine. I have been goaded into rebutting this specimen.
On 5/11/05, Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm disputing an argument which seems to require a number of such fine points.
> It is difficult for me to raise such disputes without mentioning the the
> points
> themselves.
>
> Howeve
Sorry, but looks like there is no rc bugs in the "baghira" package.
There was only one bug "Serious policy violations" but it is resolved now.
Why it is out of release?
p/s Also baghira is a source package for kwin-baghira.
Is it means that kwin-baghira will be refused too?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On 5/11/05, Michael K. Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fine. I have been goaded into rebutting this specimen.
Most of this is focused on contract law issues. I've written a
separate post suggesting the obvious alternative (Tort law)
> > Since Section 0 says that the GPL grants you license
Vadim Petrunin wrote:
> Sorry, but looks like there is no rc bugs in the "baghira" package.
> There was only one bug "Serious policy violations" but it is resolved
> now.
> Why it is out of release?
http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/baghira.html
Ask the maintainer. It was not in Sarge because of t
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 11:06:31PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 01:45:52PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Why, in this case, isn't the package released for the other
> > architectures? There's nothing wrong with sending an update later for
> > architectures that wer
Vadim Petrunin wrote:
> Sorry, but looks like there is no rc bugs in the "baghira" package.
> There was only one bug "Serious policy violations" but it is resolved now.
> Why it is out of release?
As you can see in update-excuses:
baghira (- to 0.6f-1)
Maintainer: Jose Luis Tallon
Too yo
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:10:10AM +0200, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
> Steve Langasek schrieb:
> >>If that 2.3.x bug really only affects the newer (> 2.6.8) kernel, why
> >>not just get 2.3.x pushed into sarge? Are there any other big issues
> >>with it, that weren't in 2.2.x? Some people might certainl
#include
* Jonathan Oxer [Thu, May 12 2005, 08:55:08AM]:
> > Jon became the president of Linux Australia a while ago and is working
> > on a book so he's probably just busy and will appreciate your work.
> > I'd give him a chance to say "go ahead" though.
>
> Just to make it official: "go ahead"
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 10:33:18AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Well, there's nano -- and if you want the pine UI, most people recommend
> > mutt with a .muttrc that contains pine-style keybindings.
> >
> > At least that's what I used when switching fr
68 matches
Mail list logo
