-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ed Cogburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip class="lotsofannoyingstuff" /> > Yea, like annoying users by leaving non-free behind just because you're still > mad that the DDs voted to keep it. Sure. I *am* an AMD64 user, and I can completely understand *why* they are being cautious. You, however, are just being plain rude to the NON-OFFICIAL amd64 porting team. If you're *THAT* in need of non-free, add in the i386 sources line for it and *BUILD THEM YOURSELF*. The amd64 port is *NOT* official yet, and while there's a release cycle going, I'd rather the developers GOT ON WITH THE RELEASE, than waste time on the packages in non-free, just what exactly do you need from there that you can't build anyway? Also, if you're *really* that bothered, why not use Ubuntu which has *official* support for amd64? (I know my reasons for sticking to debian unstable, do you?) Thanks, - -- Brett Parker web: http://www.sommitrealweird.co.uk/ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCgcGMEh8oWxevnjQRAp12AKCccqkD4DW4Y7nzmI91I59QkuvyzACgptZM Dh8hkXXWT+Ko7idWgxnqAok= =VLgs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
