Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: >Hi, > >On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 12:23 -0500, Adam Majer wrote: > > >>Currently there are two packages that he maintains, >> >> > Yup. > > > >>I would like to maintain mrtg since I do use it. As to the other >>package, it probably should be orphaned. >> >> > OK, please check the bugs, review patches etc. for mrtg. >I may even sponsor it if you need it. A company I am contact >with, is just checking it, but they may switch to netmrg. > > Most (or almost most :) of the bugs seem like they were fixed some time ago. Some of the bugs look like usability issues and I will get to those.
My other "big cleanup" job was with lpr, which I think is now in a much better shape then when it was orphaned. This is another small, yet important to me, package that was neglected way too long. As to netmrg, well, it looks OK. I guess it depends what one needs. All I need it to get some SNMP data into a graph form. For me mrtg is perfect for what I need it. The new mrtg (0.11) will probably not make it into Sarge due to the freeze. The one in Sarge is quite usable without any major bugs. And finally, I will not be needed a sponsor :) >>Anyway, I will try to take care of the problem. I'll see if I can >>contact Shiju and if there is no response by end of the month, I'll >>orphan the packages and take over mrtg, unless someone has a problem. >> >> > I am OK with it, even if I am only a simple DD without too much words. >Anyway, you can do NMUs meanwhile as Jeroen already wrote about it. > > Sure. I will look over the bugs and try to get the vast majority closed/fixed. I didn't know that Jeroen tried to contact Shiju until I read his reply to you yesterday. - Adam
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
