Hi List
Have a look at http://buildroot.org
Best Regards
Ralf Buhlrich
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe to i386-uclibc and join #debian-i386-uclibc channel. The
uclibc-pc-linux-uclibc and binutils-pc-linux-uclibc are already done. Now we
are working on gcc-pc-linux-uclibc package.
https://alioth.debian.org/projects/i386-uclibc/
>Guys:
>
>
>Regarding this:
>
>http://lists.debian.org/debia
> I'm now working on discovering the best order to build the 87 needed
> source packages to get a base+buildessential set for debootstrap.
I believe this should be done on normal debian host, using dpkg-cross's
'dpkg-buildpackage -a'. As of it's current state, it won't work. But it
could be made t
Em Qua, 2005-10-26 às 16:43 +1300, Alex King escreveu:
> How is the effort going
> (http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/09/msg01362.html)?
Please see the other posts I made in this thread for more info. I just
wanted to point that I'm almost all the time (when working on this) on
#debian-dev
Em Qua, 2005-10-26 às 07:40 -0500, Bill Gatliff escreveu:
> I would be very interested in mips and arm-el ports. I have dedicated
> build hardware available for both. PLEASE let me know what else I can
> do to help!
Well I do think i386-uclibc will help another subarches, like arm-uclibc
armeb
Em Qua, 2005-10-26 às 11:31 +0400, Wartan Hachaturow escreveu:
> On 10/26/05, Nikita V. Youshchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Making support for such additional 'archs', targeting mainly uclibc archs,
> > is *the* direction where I was going to move with dpkg-cross and debian
> > cross-toolcha
Guys:
Regarding this:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/09/msg01362.html
I would be very interested in mips and arm-el ports. I have dedicated
build hardware available for both. PLEASE let me know what else I can
do to help!
(I've tinkered with dpkg in the past, but I'm no guru.
On 10/26/05, Nikita V. Youshchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Making support for such additional 'archs', targeting mainly uclibc archs,
> is *the* direction where I was going to move with dpkg-cross and debian
> cross-toolchain (I'm the current maintainer of those).
This is also a way we're cu
Hello
> How is the effort going
> (http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/09/msg01362.html)?
Pity I've read about this only now :(
Making support for such additional 'archs', targeting mainly uclibc archs,
is *the* direction where I was going to move with dpkg-cross and debian
cross-toolcha
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 18:12, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> I'm interested in maintaining a i386-uclibc architecture, which is, like
> the name says, i386 binaries linked with uClibc. My plans are:
> 1) Build all the packages used by debootstrap to generate a basedebs.tgz
> 2) Certify this basedeb
2005/9/29, Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Em Qui, 2005-09-29 às 19:05 +0200, Bastian Blank escreveu:
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 01:52:21PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> > > I'm having some problems, but I think it's because gcc is confused about
> > > which toolchain to use, because it still d
Le Jeudi 29 Septembre 2005 19:41, vous avez écrit :
> I saw this library today... I'm not so sure if it will solve the
> question, as it's still alpha... Did anybody used it in a production
> environment?
Well, I knew the existence of this library from the openwrt[1] distribution.
Maybe you can as
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:41:15PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> I saw this library today... I'm not so sure if it will solve the
> question, as it's still alpha... Did anybody used it in a production
> environment?
you're kidding me. who the hell is using 386's in a production environment?
Em Qui, 2005-09-29 às 19:11 +0200, Romain Beauxis escreveu:
> Le Jeudi 29 Septembre 2005 01:20, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > Can libstdc++ be built against uclibc? You're going to have a hard time
> > basing a Debian port on uclibc without it.
> It may be a stupid question, but I'm wondering if it
Le Jeudi 29 Septembre 2005 01:20, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> Can libstdc++ be built against uclibc? You're going to have a hard time
> basing a Debian port on uclibc without it.
Hi all!
It may be a stupid question, but I'm wondering if it would be usefull to use
uclibc++[1] instead of libstdc++
Em Qui, 2005-09-29 às 19:05 +0200, Bastian Blank escreveu:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 01:52:21PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> > I'm having some problems, but I think it's because gcc is confused about
> > which toolchain to use, because it still don't know about
> > i386-uclibc-linux as an architect
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 01:52:21PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> I'm having some problems, but I think it's because gcc is confused about
> which toolchain to use, because it still don't know about
> i386-uclibc-linux as an architecture, and it's falling back to
> i386-linux.
This is correct, as th
Em Qua, 2005-09-28 às 21:43 -0300, Daniel Ruoso escreveu:
> Em Qua, 2005-09-28 às 16:20 -0700, Steve Langasek escreveu:
> > > The i386 packages won't be compatible with my i386-uclibc environment
> > > (as I won't have glibc installed). So I started calling the architecture
> > > i386-uclibc with g
Em Qua, 2005-09-28 às 16:20 -0700, Steve Langasek escreveu:
> > The i386 packages won't be compatible with my i386-uclibc environment
> > (as I won't have glibc installed). So I started calling the architecture
> > i386-uclibc with gnu name i386-uclibc-linux. And I'd like to ask: Is it
> > OK?
> Ca
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 12:12:33PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> I'm interested in maintaining a i386-uclibc architecture, which is, like
> the name says, i386 binaries linked with uClibc. My plans are:
> 1) Build all the packages used by debootstrap to generate a basedebs.tgz
> 2) Certify this bas
Em Qua, 2005-09-28 às 18:07 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh escreveu:
> > > Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >The i386 packages won't be compatible with my i386-uclibc environment
> > > >(as I won't have glibc installed). So I started calling the architecture
> > > >i386-uclibc wit
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> Em Qua, 2005-09-28 às 18:41 +, Miquel van Smoorenburg escreveu:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >The i386 packages won't be compatible with my i386-uclibc environment
> > >(as I won't have glibc inst
Em Qua, 2005-09-28 às 18:41 +, Miquel van Smoorenburg escreveu:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >The i386 packages won't be compatible with my i386-uclibc environment
> >(as I won't have glibc installed). So I started calling the architecture
> >i3
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm interested in maintaining a i386-uclibc architecture, which is, like
>the name says, i386 binaries linked with uClibc. My plans are:
>
>Ok, now what's the problem...
>
>The i386 packages won't be compatible with my i386-u
Em Qua, 2005-09-28 às 18:03 +0200, Simon Richter escreveu:
> Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> > I'm interested in maintaining a i386-uclibc architecture, which is, like
> > the name says, i386 binaries linked with uClibc.
> However, I can see the number of configurations to be somewhat large, so
> I wonder w
Em Qua, 2005-09-28 às 15:39 +, W. Borgert escreveu:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 12:12:33PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> > What do you think?
> I would like to see a d-i port to that architecture!
> (not volunteering, sorry)
Actually... As far as i could see, this would be an easy task...
> Did
Hi,
Daniel Ruoso wrote:
I'm interested in maintaining a i386-uclibc architecture, which is, like
the name says, i386 binaries linked with uClibc. My plans are:
Well, I need an ARM bigendian uclibc port, so chances are I'm the one to
coordinate with the armbe people (in fact my personal dpkg
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 12:12:33PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> What do you think?
I would like to see a d-i port to that architecture!
(not volunteering, sorry)
Did you contact the emdebian people?
Cheers,
--
W. Borgert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, http://people.debian.org/~debacle/
--
To UNSUBSCRI
28 matches
Mail list logo
