Em Qua, 2005-09-28 às 21:43 -0300, Daniel Ruoso escreveu:
> Em Qua, 2005-09-28 às 16:20 -0700, Steve Langasek escreveu:
> > > The i386 packages won't be compatible with my i386-uclibc environment
> > > (as I won't have glibc installed). So I started calling the architecture
> > > i386-uclibc with gnu name i386-uclibc-linux. And I'd like to ask: Is it
> > > OK?
> > Can libstdc++ be built against uclibc?  You're going to have a hard time
> > basing a Debian port on uclibc without it.
> Well, it looks like it can[1]. But I'm downloading gcc source right now
> to test it...

After some research, I found that scratchbox already has libstc++ built
against uclibc...

I'm having some problems, but I think it's because gcc is confused about
which toolchain to use, because it still don't know about
i386-uclibc-linux as an architecture, and it's falling back to
i386-linux.

daniel


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to