Em Qua, 2005-09-28 às 21:43 -0300, Daniel Ruoso escreveu: > Em Qua, 2005-09-28 às 16:20 -0700, Steve Langasek escreveu: > > > The i386 packages won't be compatible with my i386-uclibc environment > > > (as I won't have glibc installed). So I started calling the architecture > > > i386-uclibc with gnu name i386-uclibc-linux. And I'd like to ask: Is it > > > OK? > > Can libstdc++ be built against uclibc? You're going to have a hard time > > basing a Debian port on uclibc without it. > Well, it looks like it can[1]. But I'm downloading gcc source right now > to test it...
After some research, I found that scratchbox already has libstc++ built against uclibc... I'm having some problems, but I think it's because gcc is confused about which toolchain to use, because it still don't know about i386-uclibc-linux as an architecture, and it's falling back to i386-linux. daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]