Em Qua, 2005-09-28 às 18:07 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh escreveu: > > > Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >The i386 packages won't be compatible with my i386-uclibc environment > > > >(as I won't have glibc installed). So I started calling the architecture > > > >i386-uclibc with gnu name i386-uclibc-linux. And I'd like to ask: Is it > > > >OK? > Adding archs is not that straight forward. e.g. what the heck will happen > when someone tries to use config.sub or config.guess? What *should* happen > then?
Nothing special... dpkg-buildpackage will handle it and the (non-debian) build scripts will receive just i386 as architecture, but i386-uclibc-linux-* as tool chain. And that's why using it as an architecture makes it so easy. daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
