apt-show-versions | grep /experimental
should work too, but I haven't tested it (no experimental packages
installed on this machine)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 04:25:52PM +0100, Jérôme Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> Le vendredi 20 janvier 2006 à 14:17 +, Paul Brossier a écrit :
> > On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 04:09:28AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> > >
> > > [Jérôme Warnier]
> > > > Or even better: a list of a
Le vendredi 20 janvier 2006 à 15:04 +0100, Michal Politowski a écrit :
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:34:11 +0100, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
> [...]
> > BTW, is there a way to list all packages in experimental?
>
> aptitude search '~Aexperimental'
>
> > Or even better: a list of all packages already instal
Le vendredi 20 janvier 2006 à 14:17 +, Paul Brossier a écrit :
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 04:09:28AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> >
> > [Jérôme Warnier]
> > > Or even better: a list of all packages already installed on my system
> > > which have an experimental version?
> >
> > There might
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 04:09:28AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Jérôme Warnier]
> > Or even better: a list of all packages already installed on my system
> > which have an experimental version?
>
> There might be a better way, but assuming you have experimental in your
> sources.list...
>
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:34:11 +0100, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
[...]
> BTW, is there a way to list all packages in experimental?
aptitude search '~Aexperimental'
> Or even better: a list of all packages already installed on my system
> which have an experimental version?
aptitude search '~i~Aexperime
[Jérôme Warnier]
> Or even better: a list of all packages already installed on my system
> which have an experimental version?
There might be a better way, but assuming you have experimental in your
sources.list...
t=$(tempfile);
awk > $t '/^Package:/{print "^" $2 "$"}' \
/var/lib/apt/li
Le jeudi 19 janvier 2006 à 16:38 +, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> On Thursday, January 19, 2006 11:35 AM, Jérôme Warnier
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > After the last update of OOo in Sid (aka Unstable), I wonder if it is
> > generally considered acceptable t
On Thursday, January 19, 2006 11:35 AM, Jérôme Warnier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After the last update of OOo in Sid (aka Unstable), I wonder if it is
> generally considered acceptable to keep obsolete packages in
> experimental (currently, Sid has 2.0.1-2 and Experimental 2.0
Le jeudi 19 janvier 2006 à 12:43 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld a écrit :
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 12:35:45PM +0100, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
> > After the last update of OOo in Sid (aka Unstable), I wonder if it is
> > generally considered acceptable to keep obsolete packages in
&
[Jérôme Warnier]
> After the last update of OOo in Sid (aka Unstable), I wonder if it is
> generally considered acceptable to keep obsolete packages in
> experimental (currently, Sid has 2.0.1-2 and Experimental 2.0.1-1).
Hmmm, I thought experimental was garbage-collected automaticall
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 12:35:45PM +0100, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
> After the last update of OOo in Sid (aka Unstable), I wonder if it is
> generally considered acceptable to keep obsolete packages in
> experimental (currently, Sid has 2.0.1-2 and Experimental 2.0.1-1).
>
> If not,
After the last update of OOo in Sid (aka Unstable), I wonder if it is
generally considered acceptable to keep obsolete packages in
experimental (currently, Sid has 2.0.1-2 and Experimental 2.0.1-1).
If not, is there a way to remove packages from Experimental?
Regards
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
13 matches
Mail list logo
