Le jeudi 19 janvier 2006 à 16:38 +0000, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : > On Thursday, January 19, 2006 11:35 AM, Jérôme Warnier > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > After the last update of OOo in Sid (aka Unstable), I wonder if it is > > generally considered acceptable to keep obsolete packages in > > experimental (currently, Sid has 2.0.1-2 and Experimental 2.0.1-1). > > Further to other answers, in this particular case you were about six and a > half hours out of date ;-) You were right. It is out of experimental now.
BTW, is there a way to list all packages in experimental? Or even better: a list of all packages already installed on my system which have an experimental version? I would like to see which ones are available. > ========================================================================= > [Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 21:06:31 -0800] [ftpmaster: Ryan Murray] > Removed the following packages from experimental: > [...] > openoffice.org | 2.0.1-1 | source, i386, powerpc, sparc > openoffice.org-base | 2.0.1-1 | i386, powerpc, sparc > [...] > openoffice.org-writer | 2.0.1-1 | i386, powerpc, sparc > [...] > ------------------- Reason ------------------- > [rene] NVIU > ---------------------------------------------- > ========================================================================= > > (i.e. rene, the archive "cruft remover" flagged the experimental packages > for removal as there was a newer version in unstable). > > Cheers, > > Adam
