On Thursday, January 19, 2006 11:35 AM, Jérôme Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After the last update of OOo in Sid (aka Unstable), I wonder if it is > generally considered acceptable to keep obsolete packages in > experimental (currently, Sid has 2.0.1-2 and Experimental 2.0.1-1). Further to other answers, in this particular case you were about six and a half hours out of date ;-) ========================================================================= [Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 21:06:31 -0800] [ftpmaster: Ryan Murray] Removed the following packages from experimental: [...] openoffice.org | 2.0.1-1 | source, i386, powerpc, sparc openoffice.org-base | 2.0.1-1 | i386, powerpc, sparc [...] openoffice.org-writer | 2.0.1-1 | i386, powerpc, sparc [...] ------------------- Reason ------------------- [rene] NVIU ---------------------------------------------- ========================================================================= (i.e. rene, the archive "cruft remover" flagged the experimental packages for removal as there was a newer version in unstable). Cheers, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
