On Sat, 2025-01-25 at 15:34 +, Richard Lewis wrote:
> downloading and running a script from a random website seems a rather
> unhelpful approach and maybe not the best idea to suggest debian
> supports this?
Does this even work with Debian?
The script
https://github.com/CrypticVerse/linux-o
On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 03:34:45PM +, Richard Lewis wrote:
> Crypticverse writes:
>
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Crypticverse
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, crypticvers...@gmail.com
> >
> > * Package name: linux-os-updater
> > Version :
Crypticverse writes:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Crypticverse
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, crypticvers...@gmail.com
>
> * Package name: linux-os-updater
> Version : 1.0.0
> Upstream Contact: Crypticverse
> * URL : https://github.co
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Crypticverse
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, crypticvers...@gmail.com
* Package name: linux-os-updater
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Contact: Crypticverse
* URL : https://github.com/CrypticVerse/linux-os-updater
* Licens
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Emmanuel Arias , Santiago Ruano Rincón
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, t...@security.debian.org,
debian-ker...@lists.debian.org, debian-...@lists.debian.org, eam...@debian.org
* Package name: linux-livepatching
Version : 0.0.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Takashi Sakamoto
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: linux-firewire-utils
Version : 0.5.0
Upstream Contact: Takashi Sakamoto
* URL :
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/ieee1394/linux-firewire-utils.git
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gürkan Myczko
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: linux-apfs-rw
Version : 0+git20210928
Upstream Authors: Ernesto A. Fernández
Corellium LLC
* URL : https://github.com/linux-apfs/li
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Stapelberg
* Package name: linux-firmware-raspi3
Version : 1.20161123
Upstream Author : Raspberry Pi Foundation
* URL : https://github.com/raspberrypi/firmware
* License : Proprietary
Description : Raspberry
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ben Hutchings
* Package name: linux-signed
Version : 1
Upstream Author : Ben Hutchings
* URL : https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/kernel/linux-signed.git/
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Sig
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, David Prévot wrote:
> Seems weird to see another non-library ending up in the
> pool/main/libr/ directory of our archive (and yet another special
> case to handle for tools like deborphan). It would be nice to avoid
> the lib- prefix for non-library.
If you want to know if som
David Prévot (26/11/2012):
> Seems weird to see another non-library ending up in the pool/main/libr/
> directory of our archive (and yet another special case to handle for
> tools like deborphan). It would be nice to avoid the lib- prefix for
> non-library.
.oO( libreoffice )
Mraw,
KiBi.
signa
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 05:41:35PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> Seems weird to see another non-library ending up in the pool/main/libr/
> directory of our archive (and yet another special case to handle for
> tools like deborphan). It would be nice to avoid the lib- prefix for
> non-library.
Nice,
Hi,
Le 26/11/2012 05:19, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 06:55:25AM +1100, Karl Goetz wrote:
> * Package name : linux-minidisc
Thats a strange name considering it builds and runs on MacOS, Windows,
Linux, FreeBSD and Haiku.
>>>
>>> Yes, the na
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 06:55:25AM +1100, Karl Goetz wrote:
> > > > * Package name : linux-minidisc
> > >
> > > Thats a strange name considering it builds and runs on MacOS, Windows,
> > > Linux, FreeBSD and Haiku.
> >
> > Yes, the name is indeed somewhat confusing in that regard.
>
> > If
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 02:26:34PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 09:02:18AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:16 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> >
> > > * Package name: linux-minidisc
> >
> > Thats a strange name considering it bu
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012, 00:26:34 LHST, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 09:02:18AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:16 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> >
> > > * Package name : linux-minidisc
> >
> > Thats a strange name considering it bu
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 09:02:18AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:16 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>
> > * Package name: linux-minidisc
>
> Thats a strange name considering it builds and runs on MacOS, Windows,
> Linux, FreeBSD and Haiku.
Yes, the name is indeed s
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:16 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> * Package name: linux-minidisc
Thats a strange name considering it builds and runs on MacOS, Windows,
Linux, FreeBSD and Haiku.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
* Package name: linux-minidisc
Version : 0.9.0
Upstream Author : linux-minidisc project
* URL : https://wiki.physik.fu-berlin.de/linux-minidisc
* License : GPLv2, LGPLv2.1
Programming Lang: C,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hector
* Package name: linux-armel
Version : 2.6.30
Upstream Author : many individuals
* URL : http://kernel.org/
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: C
Description : Linux support headers for userspace developmen
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: linux-patch-tomoyo1.7
Version: 1.7.0-20090911
Upstream Author: Tetsuo Handa
Yoshihiro Kusuno
URL: http://tomoyo.sourceforge.jp/
License: GPL version2
D
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Uwe Kleine-König"
* Package name: linux-patch-preemptrt
Upstream Author : Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner
and others
* URL : http://rt.wiki.kernel.org/
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: C
Description : The CONFIG_PREEMPT
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Armin Berres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: linux-phc
Version : 0.2.10
Upstream Author : Fabrice Bellamy, Roman Schwarze
* URL : https://www.dedigentoo.org/trac/linux-phc/
* License : (GPL)
Programming Lang: (C)
D
Package: wnpp
Hi,
Package: linux-uvc-source
Upstream: svn checkout
http://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/linux-uvc/linux-uvc/trunk
* Copyright (C) 2005-2006
* Laurent Pinchart ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
*
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christoph Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: linux-iscsi
Version : 4.0.2
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://linux-iscsi.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : driver and daemon for us
Eike Sauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andrew Suffield schrieb:
> > He doesn't need to, he can be slapped down.
>
> "Keine Gewalt!" ("No violence!")
>
> > We don't ignore minor issues just because there are major ones.
>
> So let's hope Robert can cope with minor issues
> and only talk about
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Excuse the tautology, but I find it can be useful sometimes to look at
> requirements separate from the implementation, and try to come up with
> an alternate implementation that meets the same requirements. That other
> thread is too long for me to know for
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 19:31, Adam Heath wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Santiago Vila wrote:
> >
> > > If Robert is such an incompetent developer as some people say and the
> > > package does not build on the 11 different architectures, then the
> > > p
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Eike Sauer wrote:
>
> > What about letting Robert build and upload (if ftp-masters agree)
> > his package, *if* he puts it in experimental, uses a description
> > that contains a warning about the experimental status of the
> > pack
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 11:39:38AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 08:13:18PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > > At least, the ability to do
> > >
> > > apt-get source linux
> > >
> > > as it should always have been.
> > >
> > >
>
Robert Millan wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:26:26AM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> * Package name: linux-experimental
I really don't care either way, but would you consider using
kernel-linux-whatever instead?
I considered it, but it's redundant and unnecessary. I'll stick with the
na
retitle 220401 ITP: kernel-linux-experimental -- Linux 2.4 kernel
thanks
I think you're very confused. Unfortunately, I don't have time for discussing
this with you. I'll just rename the package.
Now back to hacking.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 12:02:17PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Robert Milla
Robert Millan wrote:
>Just thought I should give you a better reply.
>On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 07:24:52PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> Robert, your (frankly autistic) worldview worries me. What do you
>> believe would be in a freebsd-kernel or netbsd-kernel package? What do
>> you believe would
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 06:38, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 12:23:44AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > I
> > for one _would_ appreciate having a debian-standard linux package.
>
> kernel-source-*, kernel-image-*, kernel-headers-*
And truth be told, since I've been using them s
> Overly terse answers (and your previous dismissals of questions as
> "trivial" despite attempts to explain why they are non-trivial) do not
> reassure anyone that you are capable of packaging a critical system
> component, especially in an ambitiously different way.
I'm reassured.
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> Just thought I should give you a better reply.
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 07:24:52PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Robert Millan wrote:
> >
> > >There's no consistency in that, since FreeBSD and NetBSD are not kernels.
> >
> > Robert, your (frankl
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 05:49:49PM -0500, Michael Poole wrote:
> >
> > Yes.
>
> Could you elaborate? The obvious interpretation of your "Yes" is that
> you do not understand a large part of your target audience (new users
> who do not customize their kernels). By and large, that set of users
> d
Just thought I should give you a better reply.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 07:24:52PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
>
> >There's no consistency in that, since FreeBSD and NetBSD are not kernels.
>
> Robert, your (frankly autistic) worldview worries me. What do you
> believe w
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 07:24:52PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> Robert Millan wrote:
>>
>> >There's no consistency in that, since FreeBSD and NetBSD are not kernels.
>>
>> Robert, your (frankly autistic) worldview worries me. What do you
>> believe
Chad Walstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:26:26AM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
>> > * Package name: linux-experimental
>>
>> I really don't care either way, but would you consider using
>> kernel-linux-whatever instead? Just for consistency's sake. As
>>
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 10:34:32PM +0100, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>
> Did you consider ease of finding alternative packages through the normal
> UI like dselect and aptitude? I, for one, appreciate similar things to
> exist next to each other.
Well no (I use apt-get), but I think I can assume that (I
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 07:24:52PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
>
> >There's no consistency in that, since FreeBSD and NetBSD are not kernels.
>
> Robert, your (frankly autistic) worldview worries me. What do you
> believe would be in a freebsd-kernel or netbsd-kernel pack
Hi Robert,
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 07:23:35PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:26:26AM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > > * Package name: linux-experimental
> >
> > I really don't care either way, but would you consider using
> > kernel-linux-whatever instead?
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 12:23:44AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> I
> for one _would_ appreciate having a debian-standard linux package.
kernel-source-*, kernel-image-*, kernel-headers-*
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `'
Robert Millan wrote:
>There's no consistency in that, since FreeBSD and NetBSD are not kernels.
Robert, your (frankly autistic) worldview worries me. What do you
believe would be in a freebsd-kernel or netbsd-kernel package? What do
you believe would be in a linux-kernel package? When someone say
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:26:26AM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > * Package name: linux-experimental
>
> I really don't care either way, but would you consider using
> kernel-linux-whatever instead?
I considered it, but it's redundant and unnecessary. I'll stick with the
name choose
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:26:26AM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > * Package name: linux-experimental
>
> I really don't care either way, but would you consider using
> kernel-linux-whatever instead? Just for consistency's sake. As
> someone else said, eventually there will be a ke
> * Package name: linux-experimental
I really don't care either way, but would you consider using
kernel-linux-whatever instead? Just for consistency's sake. As
someone else said, eventually there will be a kernel-freebsd or
kernel-netbsd, and having an uniform scheme to call these thin
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 02:31:17PM +0100, Jesus Climent wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:36:27PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Upstream Author : Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and others, see:
>
> He no longer works for transmeta. Should be changed?
s/transmeta.com/osdl.org/
>
> J
>
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 02:31:17PM +0100, Jesus Climent wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:36:27PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Upstream Author : Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and others, see:
>
> He no longer works for transmeta. Should be changed?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is ok now.
--
Fr
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 22:31, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 02:37:35PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > * Package name: linux
> > Version : 2.4.22
> > Upstream Author : Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and others, see:
>
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:36:27PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> Upstream Author : Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and others, see:
He no longer works for transmeta. Should be changed?
J
--
Jesus Climent info:www.pumuki.org
Unix SysAdm|Linux User #66350
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 00:23, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 22:31, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 02:37:35PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > Package: wnpp
> > > Severity: wishlist
> > >
> > > * Package name: linux
> > > Version : 2.4.22
> > > Ups
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 03:29:04PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> Either satisfies the first part of my question, but at least your second
> option doesn't satisfy the second part of my question. I'll repeat:
>
> "without leaving old System.map junk around for eternity"
>
> When would you clea
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 05:14:02PM +0100, Eike Sauer wrote:
> Robert Millan schrieb:
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 02:17:10PM +0100, Eike Sauer wrote:
> >> Robert Millan schrieb:
> >> > I don't see why. I have a bunch of resources to find a solution for
> >> > this trivial bug.
> [...]
> > I didn't w
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 03:48:26PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 11:40:11PM +1100, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> > There are already several forks of the Linux kernel in Debian anyway.
> > Robert wishes to attempt to unify them, does that not grant him use of the
> > name 'linu
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 04:02:14PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 02:47:14PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > However,
> > for the matter of finding out wether there will be much people in that
> > userbase, there's the Popularity Contest.
>
> Some people just never learn.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: linux-experimental
Version : 2.4.22
Upstream Author : Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and others, see:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/CREDITS
* URL : http://www.kernel.org/
* License
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 02:37:35PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: linux
> Version : 2.4.22
> Upstream Author : Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and others, see:
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/CRED
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Problems of this approach, off the top of my head:
>
> a. Having a binary package of the same name that is produced by
> different source packages on different architectures may or may not
> drive the archive maintainence scripts nuts. On the other han
Excuse the tautology, but I find it can be useful sometimes to look at
requirements separate from the implementation, and try to come up with
an alternate implementation that meets the same requirements. That other
thread is too long for me to know for sure what all the requirements of
the proposed
Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.4.23-1-i386
> Version: 2.4.23-1
>
> /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.23
> /boot/System.map-2.4.23
> /lib/modules/2.4.23/...
>
> [ Here I'll just state that I don't know if the -1- bit in the package
>name modifies the kernel version in any
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> I am surprised at the vehemence at someone who dares do something new. I
> don't care whether his approach is technically valid or not: as long as
> he doesn't harm anyone, there's no point in preventing him. Mass
> attacking someone who actually does things, and doesn't jus
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> and dpkg doesn't support
> installing source packages, so tracking this source has to be done by
> hand.
There is apt-src, however.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 12:54:18PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 03:29:06PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > It could. I decided that building four was excessive and having
> > the act of installing libc6-i686 act to disable NPTL would be a little
> > bit too strange.
>
>
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 03:29:06PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> It could. I decided that building four was excessive and having
> the act of installing libc6-i686 act to disable NPTL would be a little
> bit too strange.
Can you clue me in as to why the non-optimized libc6 package will work w
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 12:13:19PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 10:19:39PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 07:17:13PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 06:43:09PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > > And Nikita just pointed out t
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 10:19:39PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 07:17:13PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 06:43:09PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > And Nikita just pointed out there's libc6-i686. It might make sense to add
> > > linux-i686 too.
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 02:29:48PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> Why not call it "linux-experimental" or "linux-rmh" or similar then? I'm
> sure a lot of people would be much happier with your proposal if it
> didn't claim the important namespace of "linux", which implies that it
> is the preferred
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:19:33AM +1100, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
>> What I'd really like to see is some packages uploaded to your home
>> on gluck, because this thread isn't advancing *anyones* arguments.
> I did that a few days before sending the ITP:
>
#include
* Robert Millan [Tue, Nov 11 2003, 02:47:14PM]:
> > > apt-get source kernel-image-* doesn't bring me the real source.
> > > Instead, if I want the real source I must be root and install a
> > > binary package. Do you deny that this is confusing?
> >
> > Non-intuitive? Yes, I grant
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 05:21:57PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 15:29, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 05:08:16AM +0100, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
> > > Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 07:17:13P
Robert Millan schrieb:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 02:17:10PM +0100, Eike Sauer wrote:
>> Robert Millan schrieb:
>> > I don't see why. I have a bunch of resources to find a solution for
>> > this trivial bug.
[...]
> I didn't want to imply that. I was referring to general packaging
> resources like p
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Santiago Vila wrote:
> You are right. I missed that little detail. But anyway you can submit
> a serious FTBFS bug if that happens to be the case. Do the testing scripts
> ignore serious bugs?
A FTBFS bug is only supposed to be considered serious if the package
previously bui
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 03:10:14PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> The question was: How do you provide 2.4.x for architecture blah and
> 2.4.y for architecture foo, which are two versions of the same
> "upstream branch".
just to give you a better idea of what we are talking about here, these
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 02:47:14PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> However,
> for the matter of finding out wether there will be much people in that
> userbase, there's the Popularity Contest.
Some people just never learn.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.de
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 12:45:31PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 07:25:41PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 08:17:58PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > - I'm not trying to make a package, the package is already made and it
> > > works
> > >fi
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 12:21:32PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > How do you propose to do that without changing the package name, and
> > without leaving old System.map junk around for eternity? I don't see how
> > it can be possible.
> >
> > (This is exactly the same question as Matthew asked,
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 11:40:11PM +1100, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> There are already several forks of the Linux kernel in Debian anyway.
> Robert wishes to attempt to unify them, does that not grant him use of the
> name 'linux'?
No he doesn't. He wants to create a new arbitrary patch set, in a
co
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 23:54:38 +1100, Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> This one time, at band camp, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> Robert Millan wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 08:33:00PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
klogd will be unable to look up symbols, and ps and top need it
>>>
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 12:21:32PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 02:23:52PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > As a prospective maintainer of an important package, it ill behooves
> > you to make fun of legitimate bug reports.
>
> No, you're confused. I don't blame you because
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 12:21:32PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> or who pretend the dessign of my package is broken in a way that I
> can't solve such trivial bugs.
Look, you see whatever you want to see, but you are still missing the
forest for the trees. When I mentioned System.map this wa
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 02:05:50PM +0100, Eike Sauer wrote:
> Andreas Metzler schrieb:
> > Eike Sauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> There already are several packages with complete
> >> kernel sources which take as much place as his package
> >> would, right?
> > Robert does not propose to remove
What is so damn hard about respecting a "Mail-Followup-To:" header?
On 11-Nov-03, 06:24 (CST), Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I didn't claim all of them are trolling. But a few of them are. Also IIRC I
> haven't put in question their experience as developers.
Your reply to Marcello:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 02:29:13PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> >
> > I don't like turning this ITP into a technical discussion to prove either
> > my dessign is consistent or I'm capable as a maintainer. However I'll
> > respond
> > to your question this time:
>
> Why could you not just wait fo
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:19:33AM +1100, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
>
> What I'd really like to see is some packages uploaded to your home on gluck,
> because this thread isn't advancing *anyones* arguments.
I did that a few days before sending the ITP:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/d
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 09:29:58AM -0500, Michael Poole wrote:
[...]
>> 5) How will you handle architectures where the current upstream kernel
>> is not based on the same version as your package? The main suggestion
>> I see is that they'd have to use the
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:13:42AM +1100, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
>
> I've had another thought, which was spurred by the System.map discussion;
> and some people are probably going to hate it because it duplicates some of
> the effort of having a package management system in the first place.
>
> T
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 02:17:10PM +0100, Eike Sauer wrote:
> Robert Millan schrieb:
> > I don't see why. I have a bunch of resources to find a solution for this
> > trivial bug.
>
> You are implying the other DDs are your ressource for finding
> what you are calling "trivial bugs". They are not.
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 09:29:58AM -0500, Michael Poole wrote:
>> Robert Millan writes:
>>
>> > And even if it was, I claimed my packages has some advantages, but didn't
>> > claim it doesn't have any disadvantages.
>>
>> Please explain why the putativ
Jamie Wilkinson writes:
> However, this is the word 'linux'. What else do you think it could
> possibly refer to?
Most people seem to think that 'Linux' is the name for the whole kit and
kaboodle: kernel, userland, and everything. They are wrong, but they still
will be confused by a package name
#include
* Jamie Wilkinson [Tue, Nov 11 2003, 11:40:11PM]:
> There are already several forks of the Linux kernel in Debian anyway.
> Robert wishes to attempt to unify them, does that not grant him use of the
> name 'linux'?
Bug nobody was bold enough to take exactly this (as said very generic)
n
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 11:59:32PM +1100, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Place the package files in /usr/lib, and copy them conditionaly (debconf)
> > into /boot. The debconf question would properly explain that if per chooses
> > to update it, the
#include
* Jamie Wilkinson [Tue, Nov 11 2003, 11:28:43PM]:
> >Note that the name is choosen not only to attract the user, but also to
> >catch that who blindly use "apt-get source linux". The user wouldn't get
> >the well-known and good kernel-source packages but something which is
> >under contr
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:36:30AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>
> Robert does not propose to remove the existing kernel-source packages
> therefore the calculation is simple - more than 100MB required space
Approximately. It depends on how many architectures can be supported.
> in exchange fo
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:30:54PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> - this packages adds nothing, and would occupy a fair chunk of space
>in the archive. The "advantages" cited were rapidly debunked and no
>more were given.
I haven't seen any of them being debunked. The only exception is t
Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
>Kernels install /boot/System.map-$version. There's a symlink from
>/boot/System.map to the current version.
And Robert's proposal currently results in the System.map-$version for
my current kernel vanishing, along with my modules.
>You are told you need to reboot after in
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 06:22:13PM +0100, Eike Sauer wrote:
> Hello!
Hi Eike,
> The discussion doesn't seem to be very productive any more.
> Time to come to a compromise?
Sounds nice.
> What about letting Robert build and upload (if ftp-masters agree)
> his package, *if* he puts it in experime
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 02:29:48PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 12:57:02PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 07:47:37PM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > > Look, if you want to waste time, waste _yours_. OTOH, if you want to
> > > take part in th
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 07:34:23PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 12:57:02PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > But the real results are shown through Popularity Contest [1] when my
> > package
> > reaches unstable. So keep your arguments on this for later.
>
> That is possi
1 - 100 of 278 matches
Mail list logo
