Just thought I should give you a better reply. On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 07:24:52PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > Robert Millan wrote: > > >There's no consistency in that, since FreeBSD and NetBSD are not kernels. > > Robert, your (frankly autistic) worldview worries me. What do you > believe would be in a freebsd-kernel or netbsd-kernel package? What do > you believe would be in a linux-kernel package? When someone says > "Linux", do you think they generally mean something massively different > to when they say "NetBSD"?
These questions are ambigous. Any response I could came up would fit on them. The relevant question here is not what "someone generaly means", but rather what "something is". The following question would make more sense: "Do you think Linux is something massively different than NetBSD?" (You could respond to it, btw) -- Robert Millan "[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new work." -- J.R.R.T, Ainulindale (Silmarillion)
