On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Robert Millan wrote: > > Just thought I should give you a better reply. > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 07:24:52PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > Robert Millan wrote: > > > > >There's no consistency in that, since FreeBSD and NetBSD are not kernels. > > > > Robert, your (frankly autistic) worldview worries me. What do you > > believe would be in a freebsd-kernel or netbsd-kernel package? What do > > you believe would be in a linux-kernel package? When someone says > > "Linux", do you think they generally mean something massively different > > to when they say "NetBSD"? > > These questions are ambigous. Any response I could came up would fit on them. > The relevant question here is not what "someone generaly means", but rather > what "something is". > > The following question would make more sense: > > "Do you think Linux is something massively different than NetBSD?" > > (You could respond to it, btw)
Why aren't you answering the questions?
