On Friday 21 January 2011 14:32:54 Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> > 2011/01/13 16:30:47 Invalid line: Copyright : � 2010, The Tango team
> >
>
> Could it be because of the space between Copyright and the colon?
Yes. That was not recognized by the Dpkg syntax parser. This is now accepted
but correc
Le jeudi 13 janvier 2011 16:35:06, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel a écrit :
> Le Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:47:53 +0100,
> Dominique Dumont a écrit :
>
> hello, another try :)
>
> picca@grisette:~/Debian/tango/tango$ config-edit -application
> dpkg-copyright -ui none You should install Config::Model::TkUI or
On Thursday 20 January 2011 15:33:17 Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 02:27:55PM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> > On Thursday 13 January 2011 16:35:06 Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
> > > 16:30:47 Invalid line: Copyright : � 1997-1999 AT&T Laboratories
> > > Cambridge
>
>
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 02:27:55PM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> On Thursday 13 January 2011 16:35:06 Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
> > 16:30:47 Invalid line: Copyright : � 1997-1999 AT&T Laboratories Cambridge
^
Aren't those supposed to be UTF-8 encoded?
On Saturday 15 January 2011 17:04:30 Joey Hess wrote:
> One more thing, "License: GPL-2+ | Expat" was an old syntax on the wiki,
> and it seems the parser only looks for an expansion of the GPL-2+
> license in this case, ignoring the Expat part.
That was a bug in the Parse::RecDescent grammar snip
On Thursday 13 January 2011 23:54:04 Charles Plessy wrote:
> By the way, Dominique, some licence version numbers can contain
> alphanumeric characters. For instance the LaTeX project public license,
> version 1.3c.
Given that License keywords are fuzzy, moving targets. I've dropped any
attempt at
Hello Frédéric
On Thursday 13 January 2011 16:35:06 Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
> hello, another try :)
>
> picca@grisette:~/Debian/tango/tango$ config-edit -application
> dpkg-copyright -ui none You should install Config::Model::TkUI or
> Config::Model::CursesUI for a more friendly user inter
Le Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 01:17:23PM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer a écrit :
>
> I've also wondered whether it is allowed (or not), when having a Files
> paragraph, that contains the verbatim license (not referring to a
> standalone License tag), e.g.:
> >Files: *
> >License: FOO
> > This is my wo
Le dimanche 16 janvier 2011 13:48:55, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> Given that there are only 9 different fields in the current DEP-5 syntax, I
> think that parsers can simply incorporate the full list of them rather than
> rely on a X- prefix to determine if a field is in the specification or not.
S
Le Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 01:12:46PM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer a écrit :
> On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 07:58 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > In the candidate version of the DEP, it is not recommended anymore to add
> > an X-
> > prefix to extra fields.
> btw: Why was this removed? Adding the X- is
Oh, and I've also would like to see the "X-" on personal license short
names.
Perhaps one could also add a namespace that is "privately" managed, but
still global, e.g. in the style of:
"org.example.license.foobar"
Specifying globally unique a license "foobar" from Example Org.
But not sure whet
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 12:09 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> I probably misread DEP5 -- when it says "formatted text, no synopsis",
> it probably means that the entire field including the first line
> is treated as one thing. So both "Comment: foo\n" and "Comment:\n foo\n" are
> the same value.
I've also
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 07:58 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> In the candidate version of the DEP, it is not recommended anymore to add an
> X-
> prefix to extra fields.
btw: Why was this removed? Adding the X- is not only conventional style
in email headers and many other RFCs but also (in a similar
One more thing, "License: GPL-2+ | Expat" was an old syntax on the wiki,
and it seems the parser only looks for an expansion of the GPL-2+
license in this case, ignoring the Expat part.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Le Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:09:33PM -0400, Joey Hess a écrit :
>
> I probably misread DEP5 -- when it says "formatted text, no synopsis",
> it probably means that the entire field including the first line
> is treated as one thing. So both "Comment: foo\n" and "Comment:\n foo\n" are
> the same valu
Dominique Dumont wrote:
> > Also, note that "Comment: foo" is not flagged as a problem (despite
> > being apparently illegal -- DEP-5 puzzlingly does not allow a comment
> > to have a synopsis).
>
> Now that I have finally understood this notion of synopsis, I can fix these
> issues.
I probably
On Thursday 13 January 2011 22:48:48 Joey Hess wrote:
> Also, it's missing BSD-2-clause etc.
ok. Fixed. Unless I remove all these license keyword check... Still thinking
...
> The original format from the wiki page uses comma to separate
> Files. Might be worth detecting and converting those?
D
On Thursday 13 January 2011 22:27:02 Joey Hess wrote:
> Thanks for your work, here are a few things I stumbled on.
Thanks for trying and reporting issues :-)
> Worst problem: -save *removes* all Comment fields except for one
> in the header section.
Looks like I messed up the routine that transf
Le Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 04:35:06PM +0100, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel a écrit :
> Expected:
> 'Format','Upstream-Name','Upstream-Contact','Source','Disclaimer','Comment','Copyright','Files','License','Format-Specification','Name','Maintainer','Upstream-Maintainer','Upstream-Source'
> o
Le Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 03:06:56PM +0100, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel a écrit :
>
> Warning in 'License': key 'CeCILLv2' should match
> ^(?i:Apache|Artistic|BSD|FreeBSD|ISC|CC-BY|CC-BY-SA|CC-BY-ND|CC-BY-NC|CC-BY-NC-SA|CC-BY-NC-ND|CC0|CDDL|CPL|Eiffel|Expat|GPL|LGPL|GFDL|GFDL-NIV|LPPL|MIT|MPL|Perl|PSF|
Also, it's missing BSD-2-clause etc.
The original format from the wiki page uses comma to separate
Files. Might be worth detecting and converting those?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Thanks for your work, here are a few things I stumbled on.
(Version: 1.229-1)
Worst problem: -save *removes* all Comment fields except for one
in the header section.
Also, -save converted in the header "Disclaimer:\n Foo" into "Disclaimer: Foo".
If I'm reading DEP-5 right, that's not correct, t
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 04:51:53PM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> On Thursday 13 January 2011 16:38:31 Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Please make your model recognize when a stand-alone license stanza is
> > present which defines a new license name in the file. DEP5 is not
> > intended to have an aut
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:47:53 +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> The new version of libconfig-model-perl 1.229 is now available in Sid. This
> new version provides a model of DEP-5 updated according to the CANDIDATE
> version. (Among other features [1], like editor/validator for debian/control).
>
On Thursday 13 January 2011 16:35:06 Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
> I attached the copyright file
Interesting. Your file is formatted according to the spec archived on Debian
wiki. Looks like this spec was done before the DEP-5 work begun.
Since then, some fields like Debianized-* were dropped
On Thursday 13 January 2011 16:38:31 Steve Langasek wrote:
> Please make your model recognize when a stand-alone license stanza is
> present which defines a new license name in the file. DEP5 is not
> intended to have an authoritative list of all licenses in use, only the
> common ones;
Currentl
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 03:53:14PM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> > Expected:
> > 'Format','Upstream-Name','Upstream-Contact','Source','Disclaimer','Comment
> > ','Copyright','Files','License','Format-Specification','Name','Maintainer',
> > 'Upstream-Maintainer','Upstream-Source' or an acceptable
Le Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:47:53 +0100,
Dominique Dumont a écrit :
hello, another try :)
picca@grisette:~/Debian/tango/tango$ config-edit -application dpkg-copyright
-ui none
You should install Config::Model::TkUI or Config::Model::CursesUI for a more
friendly user interface
2011/01/13 16:30:47 In
On Thursday 13 January 2011 15:06:56 Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
> Here the messages I got when checking my guidata package (already in the
> new queue)
>
> picca at grisette:~/Debian/guidata/guidata$ config-edit -application
> dpkg-copyright -ui none
> You should install Config::Model::TkUI o
Le Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:47:53 +0100,
Dominique Dumont a écrit :
> Hello
Hello
Here the messages I got when checking my guidata package (already in the new
queue)
picca at grisette:~/Debian/guidata/guidata$ config-edit -application
dpkg-copyright -ui none
You should install Config::Model::TkUI
Hello
The new version of libconfig-model-perl 1.229 is now available in Sid. This
new version provides a model of DEP-5 updated according to the CANDIDATE
version. (Among other features [1], like editor/validator for debian/control).
The DEP-5 editor must be run in the source package directory
31 matches
Mail list logo
