On Thursday 13 January 2011 16:38:31 Steve Langasek wrote: > Please make your model recognize when a stand-alone license stanza is > present which defines a new license name in the file. DEP5 is not > intended to have an authoritative list of all licenses in use, only the > common ones;
Currently, unknown keyword are accepted with a warning. The only other solution is to accept unknown keyword *without* warning (i.e. silently). Is this what you want ? > still, we do need validating parsers to recognize when > there's an undefined reference to a license name that's not defined in the > file. That's currently provided. All the best. Dominique -- http://config-model.wiki.sourceforge.net/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/ http://www.ohloh.net/accounts/ddumont -o- http://ddumont.wordpress.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201101131651.54193.d...@komarr.gre.hp.com
